waybread
Well-known member
It can not be both or is not our art and science a little shaky and no wonder many doubt astrology as there is so much disagreement upon something so simple from our elders?
Hello Waybread,
I looked at the links you provided regarding the dispute about 4th/10th mother/father confusion and they did not resolve anyhting for me. Your concren that when we say that both of these houses are or can be either parent invalidates astrology, in my mind it does no such thing . It simply posits that astrology is both a science and an art where nuance and complexity is inherent, an any attempt at advancing the discipline must be open to reinterpreting older teachings. Every science reinterprets/redesigns older paradigms - we no longer teach that the Earth is the center of the solar system, we now use asteroids in interpretaion etc. It isn't that the older teachings were "wrong" but they were limited by what they could observe scientifically and what they could sense intuitively. Clearly our scientific knowledge has improved and expanded. Can I posit that intuitive abilities may be better than they were centuries ago? At first look this seems unlikely, even silly. But intuitive abilities are informed by what is in the conscious awareness as well as that which is not. I believe that as a species we are evolving. and thus it is that likely our abilities in all ares are improving (for many anyhow).
B at thelivingsky.wordpress.com
Living Sky, were you quoting me or Zadkiel's Ghost? (ZG is the one with the large blue type.) Obviously I've been arguing for some flexibility in interpreting the 10th/4th house axis.