You're experiencing what's called Capricorn Denial Syndrome, similar to the popular
Virgo Denial Syndrome.
Actually, I'm an Aquarius, but that makes no sense to me since I'm introverted, a [strikethrough]pessimist[/strikethrough] realist, and I don't exactly fit the "sanguine" descriptor from the video links in my siggie, so
I want to be a Capricorn. Cold and dry just suits me better than hot and wet.
Inconjunct said:
Sidereal is NOT more accurate. It is as much a symbolic division of the sky as tropical. The constellations do not divvy up the heavens in thirty-degree chunks. What's more, my sidereal chart makes absolutely no sense to me whatsoever (I become a Sun-Aries for starters, which is just ludicrous)
Why should the equinoxes and solstices divvy up the heavens in thirty-degree chunks? I can point to constellations. I can some-what point to equinoxes and solstices, but I can't divide the sky into 12 based on them, or at least I can't say that those twelvefold are real objects under the name Capricorn, Aquarius, etc. Astronomers would laugh. Why should those 30-degree chunks based on equinox and solstice points even have any influence in the first place? I'm getting to know myself. I know that I'm a terrible Aquarius because I'm just so sanguine [/sarcasm] and I'm also a terrible Cancer because I'd rather be alone than be close to people. I would still be a terrible Gemini because I don't talk enough. I'm not scattered or a lazy bum (the Moon and Venus are lazy bums
at best) like my tropical chart suggests, and the use of both of my malefics is generally beneficial to me. While we're on malefics, a dude I know has Mars in Scorpio as his final dispositor and he can't keep a secret. He has Saturn in Taurus and he can't hang onto money for his life (no offense to him.)
Edit: Cancer Moons and Aqua Suns are supposed to have really light and jovial dispositons. Do either of those signs like scary or heavy things, like I use in my arts all the time? I don't think so, but I could be wrong... Of course I'm a
(my final dispositors.)
= the darkest sign,
= the most creative sign.
It's imaginary astrology, not reality-based, that's what bothers me.
Isn't all astrology imaginary?