david starling
Well-known member
The well-known and much talked and argued about Aquarian Age is entirely sidereal. That means, it doesn't have any application to the tropical zodiac most of us here, in this Community (including myself) are using.
But, the 2 zodiacs aren't really that different--they're measured in the same plane, both with 12 equally measured Signs, with the Earth in the center of the zodiacal circle. The placements of the Signs are out of alignment, but they have the same names and meanings. Aspects remain the same when moving from one type of zodiac to the other, in the geometrical sense. Only one thing the sidereal zodiac is telling us about that the tropical zodiac is not being used for: What's the Age-sign, and what degree is it in?
So, this question is: Hypothetically, should we be ABLE to find a way to determine the astrological Ages in a purely tropical manner? I see no reason to dismiss the possibility, as countless others have done in past, are continuing to do today. Any ideas on the answer?
But, the 2 zodiacs aren't really that different--they're measured in the same plane, both with 12 equally measured Signs, with the Earth in the center of the zodiacal circle. The placements of the Signs are out of alignment, but they have the same names and meanings. Aspects remain the same when moving from one type of zodiac to the other, in the geometrical sense. Only one thing the sidereal zodiac is telling us about that the tropical zodiac is not being used for: What's the Age-sign, and what degree is it in?
So, this question is: Hypothetically, should we be ABLE to find a way to determine the astrological Ages in a purely tropical manner? I see no reason to dismiss the possibility, as countless others have done in past, are continuing to do today. Any ideas on the answer?