The investigators are also finding it very hard to find a motive and maybe ... just maybe, this was not a planned act or even an act done by him .. rather just an accident.
Many of the interviews I have heard from fellow friends, neighbors, and co-workers paint this person admirably and not likely to do this act although, that is not a fact just their impression of the person. The media is bringing up what an ex-girlfriend said ... that's not usually a good reference as an "ex" anything has an axe to grind. There was also mention that the investigators had not even interviewed her and the assumption being that she probably couldn't add much or what she would say would be dubious.
A bit earlier the experts were on again and they picked up on the fact that there was no mention of the door alarm on the transcripts. They were at a loss as to why that did not happen and it meant that the pilot had not pressed in the code ... but, people forget codes in time of stress so that's not unusual but it could potentially mean that the co-pilot had not locked the door and it had gotten locked as the pilot exited the cockpit.
I looked at the chart of the co-pilot and the activation in the chart was to Chiron which I call the wounded warrior, this was telling me that he was going to be blamed for this but, I didn't see anything in the chart that was indicating he did it. Yes, he does have a Pluto/Mars conjunction but, it was not being activated from what I looked at so far in the chart.
Based on what I saw in the chart, I started to question what the media was saying (murdering the passengers) and I realized that it was full of holes. It doesn't matter how many times the media says it, they have to have facts to back it up and they don't have any that back up what they say.
Sure. I agree, without the benefit of facts the industry often gleans from black box crash investigations any conclusion is unstable. Pieces of the puzzle are missing, which is to be expected at this stage. However, lines of evidence come from several sources.
* His personal life (i.e., pregnancy paired with relationship breakdown): Negative reports.
* His health (i.e., psychiatric judgement): Negative reports.
* His professional integrity (i.e., ripped up medical certificates): Negative reports.
* His friends and neighbours: Positive reports.
Of these four lines of evidence only one, friends and neighbours, is positive. I also think this one is the least reliable source of evidence within an investigation such as this because of the nature of these relationships. Intimate relationships are an intense merging of two people into one. This process inevitably reveals the problems in a person because they can no longer be concealed. Second, getting psychiatric help provides a similarly clear window because psychiatric help is sought under pressure and desperation when a person is out of control. The ripped up medical certificates hold the most weight because they are direct evidence of co-pilot's
modus opernadi, selfish, controlling and disturbed. We know he was a coward, living a lie (death). That much seems fact.
Sources against this conclusion come from friends and neighbours. However, these are not intimate relationships and are therefore unlikely to reveal the intimate detail necessary for deciphering a motive, which is what this is about. If I was in a relationship with an abusive man, that would be enough info. for me. What his friends have to say about his other face with them would be completely irrelevant. Some characters are all round abusive. Some are abusive only behind closed doors. Imo, testimonies of his friends and neighbours are not in power to negate the testimony of his ex-girlfriend, a testimony which also happens to be supported by medical evidence and, as a piece of the puzzle, fits in neatly with his ripping up of medical certificates. The friends and neighbours testimony does not fit and it is not unreasonable to see why.
Astrology will show people have things going on under the surface which is not shown outside. In co-pilot's chart activations must be reliant on his ascendant given the nature of both the event, his relations to the public, and suspected reason for the event, a possible personality disorder. Does his chart speak of these aforementioned malicious events which we know are true, extreme stress, romantic break up, personal breakdown, expecting to become a father?
I admire with your diplomatic approach in suggesting alternatives. Please excuse my more fixed position. I do feel empathy for the co-pilot but whenever I try to get into his shoes I just can't accept his conviction to hide his condition, abuse his position of trust and power and place others in such danger. No doubt an important, possibly deciding, piece of evidence will come from the aviation services. At present, however, they have provided official support in neither direction. I can understand that among their priorities is the aim to treat the families involved, including the co-pilot, with the utmost dignity particularly at this early stage. It is what it is.
