Is Pluto an astrological planet?

JUPITERASC

Well-known member
Pluto ingressed tropical Capricorn in 2008, the year of the Meltdown of the U.S. economy.
The double-planet named for the Greco-Roman god of the Underworld is small in size, but its transits loom large when it comes to mundane events on a Global scale. This current pandemic is a case in point, a Saturn/Pluto conjunction to get it going, and there will be other Pluto-related events to come.
"We've managed to convince some gullible astrologers
that Pluto isn't really an astrological planet!!!"
On Mar. 9th, 2008,
with Pluto
exactly
one degree
into Capricorn,
the financial meltdown
began
on Wall Street. :surprised:


Siriusly

dwarf planetoid-maybe-it's-a-comet-pluto
[FONT=Arial, Sans, Verdana]
[/FONT]

[FONT=Arial, Sans, Verdana] SPENDS EIGHT WEEKS ON ONE DEGREE :smile:[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Sans, Verdana]
[/FONT]

[FONT=Arial, Sans, Verdana]and
[/FONT]

[FONT=Arial, Sans, Verdana]
[/FONT]

[FONT=Arial, Sans, Verdana]requires
[/FONT]

[FONT=Arial, Sans, Verdana]TWO HUNDRED AND FORTY EIGHT YEARS to orbit SUN[/FONT]


[FONT=Arial, Sans, Verdana]and[/FONT]

[FONT=Arial, Sans, Verdana][FONT=Arial, Sans, Verdana]only moves TWO DEGREES A YEAR WHEN RETROGRADE[/FONT][/FONT]


Interesting about the approximately 8 weeks Pluto takes to move one degree: The (non-astrological) article in The Guardian, entitled "Three Weeks That Changed the World" that I read about the Meltdown, said there was an "eerie calm" during the two months preceding it! The calm before the storm....
Exactly. Pluto destroys so we can rebuild. It's amazing, omg how blind was I by the old testament.




[FONT=Arial, Sans, Verdana][FONT=Arial, Sans, Verdana]
giphy.gif

[/FONT]
[/FONT]




hqdefault.jpg
 

JUPITERASC

Well-known member
It seems Pluto is not an asstrological planet. :(
The International Astronomical Union (IAU)
downgraded the status of Pluto to that of a dwarf planet

because

it did not meet the three criteria the IAU uses
to define a full-sized planet.
Essentially Pluto meets all the criteria except one
- it “has not cleared its neighboring region of other objects.” :smile:
 

JUPITERASC

Well-known member
How could science deem anything noticeable or not? That is a completely subjective opinion.

Any planet that can be seen from Earth with a telescope is obviously sending electromagnetic waves towards us.
If it has an effect, no matter how minor, it has an effect.
Just because its effects are very small does not constitute completely dismissing it.
consider........
Moon, Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn all reflect the light from the Sun

That's of major importance when one considers Basic Horary principles

- which, for example, -

require 'collection of light' as well as 'translation of light'

which are not possible unless the heavenly bodies under consideration reflect the light of the sun :smile:


Moon, Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter and Saturn are clearly seen in night skies
because they CLEARLY STRONGLY REFLECT the light of the sun
to the extent that they are clearly seen with vision unaided by artificial aids of any kind
.


distant dwarf planet pluto, orbiting our Sun,
is too remote from our sun
to reflect the light of the Sun with sufficient strength
to render pluto visible from a geocentric perspective.

also keep in mind that
Moon STRONGLY reflects light of the Sun
but
in contrast

REMOTE DWARF PLANETOID PLUTO CANNOT DO THAT
i.e.
at night
given clear skies
when Sun is below the horizon and Moon is above the horizon
MOON IS CLEARLY VISIBLE
Moonlight is sufficiently bright to illuminate the scene and also cast a shadow.
Venus is also sufficiently bright, given optimum conditions, to cast a shadow
 

david starling

Well-known member
consider........
Moon, Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn all reflect the light from the Sun

That's of major importance when one considers Basic Horary principles

- which, for example, -

require 'collection of light' as well as 'translation of light'

which are not possible unless the heavenly bodies under consideration reflect the light of the sun :smile:


Moon, Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter and Saturn are clearly seen in night skies
because they CLEARLY STRONGLY REFLECT the light of the sun
to the extent that they are clearly seen with vision unaided by artificial aids of any kind
.


distant dwarf planet pluto, orbiting our Sun,
is too remote from our sun
to reflect the light of the Sun with sufficient strength
to render pluto visible from a geocentric perspective.

also keep in mind that
Moon STRONGLY reflects light of the Sun
but
in contrast

REMOTE DWARF PLANETOID PLUTO CANNOT DO THAT
i.e.
at night
given clear skies
when Sun is below the horizon and Moon is above the horizon
MOON IS CLEARLY VISIBLE
Moonlight is sufficiently bright to illuminate the scene and also cast a shadow.
Venus is also sufficiently bright, given optimum conditions, to cast a shadow

But, according to this theory, when light is blocked by the Earth, such as the Sun in a night chart, or any planet below the horizon, which prevents its reflective light from reaching the designated location, wouldn't that cancel its Influence on the chart?
 

JUPITERASC

Well-known member
fact is
Moon, Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn
all reflect the light from the Sun
which is of major importance when one considers Basic Horary principles
- which require 'collection of light' as well as 'translation of light'
neither of which is possible unless the heavenly bodies under consideration

reflect the light of the sun :smile:

Moon, Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter and Saturn are clearly seen in night skies
because they CLEARLY STRONGLY REFLECT the light of the sun
to the extent that they are clearly seen with vision unaided by artificial aids of any kind
.
and in contrast

distant dwarf planet pluto, orbiting our Sun,
is too remote from our sun
to reflect the light of the Sun with sufficient strength
to render pluto visible from a geocentric perspective.

also keep in mind that
Moon STRONGLY reflects light of the Sun
but
REMOTE DWARF PLANETOID PLUTO CANNOT DO THAT
i.e.
at night
given clear skies
when Sun is below the horizon and Moon is above the horizon
MOON IS CLEARLY VISIBLE
Moonlight is sufficiently bright to illuminate the scene and also cast a shadow.
Venus is also sufficiently bright, given optimum conditions, to cast a shadow
 

petosiris

Banned
But, according to this theory, when light is blocked by the Earth, such as the Sun in a night chart, or any planet below the horizon, which prevents its reflective light from reaching the designated location, wouldn't that cancel its Influence on the chart?

The Earth doesn't block the light of the stars below the horizon. The people on the other side can see them shining. They are not eclipsed. :smile:
 

JUPITERASC

Well-known member
But, according to this theory, when light is blocked by the Earth,
such as the Sun in a night chart, or any planet below the horizon,
which prevents its reflective light from reaching the designated location,
wouldn't that cancel its Influence on the chart?
Siriusly :smile:
i.e.
The Earth doesn't block the light of the stars below the horizon.

The people on the other side can see them shining.
They are not eclipsed. :smile:



Quote:
Originally Posted by Zonark
Guess that means we have a lot of work to do!



There's more than sufficient work delineating fixed stars, eclipses, PoF,
profection, firdaria, solar revolution et al
without ten thousand dwarf planets
not to mention
more than one hundred and fifty million asteroids
and other space junk


Few observe local skies seeking astrological insight ~
most are content with two-dimensional diagrams created by computer software

As for Eris, that dwarf planet is clearly an 'astrological planet'
IF dwarf planet pluto is
 

JUPITERASC

Well-known member
My impression is

An impression is not equivalent to evidence

that the classical planets
have been so utterly overloaded with
meanings that have been taken from the outer planets
that misleading comment is simply not possible


because

classical planet delineation precedes outer planet delineation by several thousand years :smile:



that at times
it has become counter-intuitive.
counter-intuitive = at odds with your own personal intuition
which obviously differs from the intuition of others
You've been expecting too much.

Astrology can't replace your intuition.
That explains why you ignore common sense




This threads still go on.

At this point this discussion is just plain silly. :whistling:

What Oddity mentions of overlapping meanings, is

what seems to be a "faulty" and trivial logic applied to the outer planets
to give them what ever meaning someone may need
to explain something.
To be honest, its rather this simplification of the system
that makes the case against outer planets.

Pluto's rulership of Scorpio is the most common example:

- Pluto in mythology is the god of the underworld (death):

....Thus he was assigned the 8th house
....Thus he was assigned Scorpio (traditionally the 8th house sign)

And thats were the rulership over Scorpio came by.
Not because the meaning of the planet has anything to do with Scorpio,
or its opposite Taurus;
not because its triplicity, or its aspect scheme relating to the Sun/Moon;
not because of the dual femmenine/masculine sign rulership,
or its sect.
 

JUPITERASC

Well-known member
The International Astronomical Union (IAU)
downgraded the status of Pluto to that of a dwarf planet

because

it did not meet the three criteria the IAU uses
to define a full-sized planet.
Essentially Pluto meets all the criteria except one
- it “has not cleared its neighboring region of other objects.” :smile:

.
 

JUPITERASC

Well-known member
"There are ACTUALLY some astrologers who don't believe Pluto is an astrological planet!!!"

Humans an our labels.
We make labels, then argue about those made up labels.
What odd creatures humans are.
:lol:

images



images



Who decided worms wanted to be called so?
I am offended for the worm society of earth.



s-l300.jpg


Wait, who decided here was called Earth? :pouty:




The name Earth comes from Old English and Germanic :smile:
Anshar and Kishar symbolized heaven and earth, respectively.

ANTUM - The Babylonian goddess of the earth, an early fertility goddess.

ANU - Also known as An in the Sumerian pantheon, he was the sky god
and Lord of the Heavens in tales written before 2500 BCE.



Pluto-Banner1.jpg
 

Opal

Premium Member
The International Astronomical Union (IAU)
downgraded the status of Pluto to that of a dwarf planet

because

it did not meet the three criteria the IAU uses
to define a full-sized planet.
Essentially Pluto meets all the criteria except one
- it “has not cleared its neighboring region of other objects.” :smile:

Pluto, known for explosive events. Outbursts. Technically, socially it has a bad reputation. But. It is my ruling planet. Conjunct my MC with scorpio rising. With all that, Pluto is social. :biggrin: Pluto doesn't want everyone to clear out. Pluto is so far out, with such a long orbit, Pluto wants some company. :w00t:
 
Top