What makes you say this? I have never found this to be the case with any chart, unless the astrologer is relying on cookbook definitions for the aspect relationships.
Hey Zarathu,
In my case, I see myself only in that chart.
The draconic chart corresponds to the tropical chart, but the draconic sidereal corresponds to the sidereal chart. If you look at the actual planets positions in the sky, Pluto for example isn't in Capricorn yet, it's in Sagittarius. In my opinion the sidereal is accurate concerning the planets positions in the sky, because the precession of the equinox is real, but the real chart is the sidereal draconic.
I'm absolutely sure and even consider writing a book about it, but am still researching the details of the relation between the sidereal and the sidereal draconic chart and their field of influence.
The reason you or other astrologers don't consider this is exactly the fact that you stick to the cookbook concerning astrology.
I research by myself, am always skeptical, analytical and profound.
I'm not saying you or any other are lesser skilled in astrology, there probably are things you know better than I, and I had the chance that my chart was a more extreme case and I couldn't see myself in it and so I researched because it didn't give me ease.
Thanks for your interest in the topic I opened. I would gladly share my view with you and maybe we could analyse each others charts together and come to some new conclusions if you like to.