Random presidential thoughts

D

david starling

Well-known member
JUPITERASC said:
Not surprising that Trump objected :smile:
A federal judge agreed with Trump
and found Green party candidate Jill Stein
had no legal standing to request another look at ballots
Click to expand...

With nothing to lose, it is surprising that Trump bothered to interfere with the recount. Since his number 1 rule, is "Don't Get Caught", he very likely has something to hide. Not releasing his tax returns--very likely, something to hide.
 
JUPITERASC

JUPITERASC

Well-known member
david starling said:

With nothing to lose, it is surprising that Trump bothered to interfere with the recount.
Since his number 1 rule, is "Don't Get Caught", he very likely has something to hide.
Not releasing his tax returns--very likely, something to hide.
Click to expand...
Not surprising that Trump would object to a recount request from Green Party candidate Jill Stein
since Stein had no chance of winning and was merely scamming desperate Democrats for donations
Jill Stein raised $7 million plus - allegedly as funds for recount
images



there is now a possibility Jill Stein may have to return those funds

by the way
Hillary deleted more than 33,000 emails so HRC definitely hiding something :smile:
 
D

david starling

Well-known member
JUPITERASC said:
Not surprising that Trump would object to a recount request from Green Party candidate Jill Stein
since Stein had no chance of winning and was merely scamming desperate Democrats for donations
Jill Stein raised $7 million plus - allegedly as funds for recount
images



there is now a possibility Jill Stein may have to return those funds

by the way
Hillary deleted more than 33,000 emails so HRC definitely hiding something :smile:
Click to expand...

But....neither Jill nor Hill had anything to lose from a recount. It appears Trump did--but....what could it have been? :confused:
 
D

david starling

Well-known member
Abolishing the Electoral College would apparently (meaning in the future it COULD potentially benefit the Republicans) benefit the Democratic Party. But, having "NONE of the ABOVE" on the ballot for choice of President would benefit all American voters. This "lesser of two evils" election proved it!:bandit:
 
D

david starling

Well-known member
JUPITERASC said:
Hillary had already lost so surprisingky she did not request a recount :smile:
Unfortunately for Hillary, Jill Steins recount request only added to Trumps margin of victory

main-qimg-704cf96baab30b23d42b90998c047142
Click to expand...

Surprising then, since that recount ADDED to Trump's margin of victory, that he demanded the Michigan recount not be allowed--very strange....wait!....unless the Russians were able to rig the Wisconsin recount but not the one in Michigan! That would explain it! :lol:
 
Last edited:
JUPITERASC

JUPITERASC

Well-known member
david starling said:
Surprising then, since that recount ADDED to Trump's margin of victory,
that he demanded the Michigan recount not be allowed
--very strange
....wait!....unless the Russians were able to rig the Wisconsin recount
but not the one in Michigan! That would explain it! :lol:
Click to expand...
all the recounts benefit Trump - some by a greater margin than others :smile:
Trump simply stated that
the recounts were illegal because the person requesting the recounts
Jill Stein of the Green Party
had no chance at all of winning the election
and was not an aggrieved party
thus MICHIGAN taxpayers may have had to have paid up to $5 million
for the recount IF it had been allowed to continue

Jill Stein raised $7 milllion
specifically for recounts
which she now wants to keep


 Trump rightly claimed the recounts were untenable
on the grounds that Jill Steins share of the vote had no chance of overtaking either HRC OR TRUMP
and
judges agreed

Surprisingly
Clinton afficianados blamed the Russians for HRC's loss
desperate Clinton cult followers claim now
that "the Russians did it!"
The entire liberal media is trying to question the election based on Russian hacking.

Judge Napolitano made it very clear several times
that it wasn’t the Russians , it was our own FBI and NSA!

For the past few weeks the MSM and liberals have been pushing the idea strenuously
that the Russians are committed cyber warfare to make sure Trump won the election.

Napolitano says it is the FBI and the NSA that hacked the DNC.
They hate Hillary so bad that they broke the law to make sure she didn’t get elected.
Hillary used this talking point as a big issue in the debate.

PROOF RUSSIANS DID NOT HACK THE ELECTION! :smile:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Us-364_6sws

CHAOS! CHUCK TODD AND REINCE PRIEBUS GO AT IT!
 
JUPITERASC

JUPITERASC

Well-known member
Massive Voter Fraud Uncovered in Nevada in the 2016 Presidential election
Nevada, which has voted for the winner of the Presidency for the past 108 years
may have been stolen
Republican Assembly Candidate for District 15, Stan Vaughan
had actual proof of the massive voter fraud in his Clark County district.
A total number of 17,086 votes were cast in the District for both Republican and Democrat candidates.
However, when confirmation letters were sent to the voters in the District
the US postal service returned mail from 9,200 of these voters.

Vaughn found that many of the people who are listed as deceased are still on the active voter rolls.
Many of the returned mail came back with 5 people living in a vacant lot with no mail receptacle. according to Mr. Vaughan - Edward Snowden, Willie Nelson, Waylon Jennings
and dozens of movie stars were registered to vote in District 15
Vaughan tested a sample of 200 people of the 9,200 return mail
and found that 185 of those had indeed voted
there were other serious voting system irregularities he documented.

It was previously reported that
Nevada poll workers wore "defeat-Trump" t-shirts at the polls during the election
which was against the law
President-elect Donald Trump lost by only 27,000 votes statewide in Nevada.
So 9,200 fraudulent voters in one small Assembly district
is more than 1/3 of the total margin that Trump lost by.

Green Party candidate Jill Stein asked for recounts in three states won by President-elect Donald Trump
in this year’s election (Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania).
Her rationale for requesting these recounts was voter fraud.
Stein claimed impartiality and to not act on behalf of Hillary Rodham Clinton
HOWEVER, STEIN DID NOT REQUEST ANY RECOUNTS IN NEVADA :smile:
 
Blaze

Blaze

Account Closed
JUPITERASC said:
*

Fox News contributor reacts to
PM Netanyahu's optimism
for improved relations :smile:
under a Trump administration
Huckabee:
Israel celebrating end of 'hostile' Obama regime
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ch7oxanFi_4
Click to expand...

Lol, Israel calling Obama hostile? Pot calling the kettle black, eh? :lol:

And I guess Israel wants Trump to give them a better deal than the 30 billion dollar one Obama gave them. Cos that 30 billion is just too little. :whistling:
 
JUPITERASC

JUPITERASC

Well-known member
*

On Monday, Wisconsin’s vote recount ended any controversy
surrounding President-elect Donald Trump’s victory in the traditionally blue state.
The Associated Press reported that Trump’s margin of victory actually increased in the recount
whose results were certified Monday.
The Republican nominee picked up an additional 162 votes in the state, according to the report :smile:
Trump earned approximately 22,000 more votes than Democrat opponent Hillary Clinton.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jf1JsM2ixfk
 
Top