Phil
Well-known member
Interesting thread. I have a science background, but nevertheless got interested in astrology, though as others have stated, never discussed it with coworkers, since newspaper astrology has made it look ridiculous.
Just a few questions:
Examples have been given of an event in the past ultimately causing a major event to have occured in the future and attaching importance to the trigger, in the sense of the butterfly effect. But can't this line of thinking regress infinitely backwards? Greybeard mentioned the changing of the tire as being the start of a chain reaction leading to his marrying his wife. But did the chain start there? How about the decision to visit the desert in Sonora? To get on the bus? Can't you just quasi-infinitely trace events backwards leading to event in question? Going back further don't you also have to consider your parent's lifes? Ad infinitum. Does this type of thinking get us anywhere? Or am I missing something? How can you determine the initial condition in the chaotic system anyhow?
I can understand it perhaps applying to the initial condition of a weather system, but to a human life? It seems to me that the selection of the "trigger" is arbitrary, one can infinitely regress...
The universe is infinitely complex and we are a part of it. Astrology (to me) seems like an attempt at a simplistic sketch of the most salient points of our tiny part in the universe (this reasoning applies to science too...).
Start bringing chaos theory into the fray, and a Pandora's box of complexity opens up. I just find that a mixture of the reductionist approach and a holistic view of the entire horoscope for patterns is a valid approach. Granted, this is just my opinion.
Just a few questions:
Examples have been given of an event in the past ultimately causing a major event to have occured in the future and attaching importance to the trigger, in the sense of the butterfly effect. But can't this line of thinking regress infinitely backwards? Greybeard mentioned the changing of the tire as being the start of a chain reaction leading to his marrying his wife. But did the chain start there? How about the decision to visit the desert in Sonora? To get on the bus? Can't you just quasi-infinitely trace events backwards leading to event in question? Going back further don't you also have to consider your parent's lifes? Ad infinitum. Does this type of thinking get us anywhere? Or am I missing something? How can you determine the initial condition in the chaotic system anyhow?
I can understand it perhaps applying to the initial condition of a weather system, but to a human life? It seems to me that the selection of the "trigger" is arbitrary, one can infinitely regress...
The universe is infinitely complex and we are a part of it. Astrology (to me) seems like an attempt at a simplistic sketch of the most salient points of our tiny part in the universe (this reasoning applies to science too...).
Start bringing chaos theory into the fray, and a Pandora's box of complexity opens up. I just find that a mixture of the reductionist approach and a holistic view of the entire horoscope for patterns is a valid approach. Granted, this is just my opinion.