Angelo Viggiani
Member
In the other post I asked about "what defines the functions, themes and influences of a planet". I've got some answers. Some said that we have to trust the lores, some said we have to look at the old texts, some said we have to rely on the simultanity that makes astronomers give "right" names to new discovered celestial bodies, some said to look at the myths, some said to look at the astrophysical characteristics of the bodies or to pay attention to the events which have happened in the occasion of the discovery. Maybe we'll never know what is the right method to define the functions of the planets in Astrology, but I'm still searching for this method.
Now, I want to know your opinion about "rulers"
For you all... What defines if a celestial body can be a ruler or not?
- Does it have to be a planet?
- Does it have to be visible, big or next to us?
- Does it have to have a relevant gravitational influence over the Earth?
- Are centaurs, like chiron, relevant enough to rule a sign?
- Are minor planets, like Pluto and Ceres important enough?
- What does really make some celestial body a likely ruler of a sign?
Now... Let's talk about the rulers, people!
Thank you
Now, I want to know your opinion about "rulers"
For you all... What defines if a celestial body can be a ruler or not?
- Does it have to be a planet?
- Does it have to be visible, big or next to us?
- Does it have to have a relevant gravitational influence over the Earth?
- Are centaurs, like chiron, relevant enough to rule a sign?
- Are minor planets, like Pluto and Ceres important enough?
- What does really make some celestial body a likely ruler of a sign?
Now... Let's talk about the rulers, people!
Thank you