Hmm...
i just came in here to point out that Yeshua's ic symbol at Cap one is the.... (as Rudhyar put it...)
"the fifty-fifth sequence of five symbols."
....And that one alone has me stumped enough... let alone your star speculations to add to the mix...
That is in reference to the manner in which Rudhyar identified the symbols as chaging in orentation to one of the three possible beginnig with the first five symbols being "ACTIONAL", then the next five symbls being that of "EMOTIONAL/CULTURAL" orientation, and the five, following that as beingm oriented as to "INDIVIDUAL/MENTAL" in the same order every five symbols, sequentially, around the Zodiac. Capricorn 01* is the 55th, out of a total of 72 sets, in sequence.
But, thank for pointing out and bringing to my attention something I had not noticed.
As I think you might be aware ...as I believe I have brought it up before in a thread or two and I might have even mentioned it in my book, that while 33 is the esoteric [I believe it's from Gnostic Christianity as the source of the esoteric meaning of the numbers "666" and "888" are source referenced by Dane Rudhyar to the Gnostic's] number for Jesus/Yeshu'a the man [as 888 is the esoteric, Gnostic, number for the Christ spirit] the number 55 is mentioned by Rudhyar as being the esoteric number for Mary/Mirriam, the Virgin Mother of Jesus/Yeshu'a. It may just be a coincidence...and then, maybe not? But instinct tells me "not"...as it has repeatedly been demonstrated to me that not even "a single blade of grass" just coincidently grows where it does.
...hmmm?
You may want to read... or re-read and refresh your mind, my thread on understanding how to apply the Sabian Symbolism found for any Astrological Part in context to that Part at another forum that I am a member of. I recently revised the technique a tad, and haven't gotten around to updating my thread on the same subject, that is, here at astrologweekly yet. As to the revision, it's just to the nomenclature that I offer, as an alternative, to that which Rudhyar developed for the, three sets of, five symbol sequences. You'll find that the ones I came up with are, albeit just slightly, different in that I identify and list them as:
Level #1 Actional
Level #2 Instinctual-Emotional
Level #3 Conscious-Rational
...and give explanation as to why...but I also mention it is only a suggestion and am open to thoughts and or criticism pertaining to that.
By the way the membership at ACTastrology.com is by invitation, or approved application, only as it is a forum for presentation of the different techiniques utilizled by the many different, and recognized, schools of Astrology. It was founded and established by renowned astrolger, and astrolgical computer software pioneer, Michael Erlewine,. The astrolgers that He extended the invitation to and accepted are most of the worlds authorities and recognized experts of those various schools. I applied and was accepted for only the reason that I manged to get one book published on the least understood and least populous school of Astrology, Sabian Symbol Astrology. World recognized living auhority on the Sabian Symbols, Lynda Hill, was invited but she turned down the offer of moderator of the sub forum titled "Oracles of All Kinds" and while she is still listed on the roles of membership she has never participated. It is a most serious and dedicated forum solely for the presentation of ones techniques and not a forum for protestation or frivolties, such as one finds here at astrologyweekly at times, all the time at the forum at astrodienst and never find at "Skyscript" as one is soon shown the door if they present anything other than the astrology used by, their 'Gilded Lily", i.e. the seventeenth century astrolger of England by the name of William Lily.
All members are most respectful of one anothers beliefs and leaves any such protestations [or even denigrations] to that of the personal opinated minds of those that read the posts. That's not to say that something posted isn't questioned by one member to that of another at times. but when it does happen it is done most courteously and in in the most pleasant of manner.
I, myself, have 366 post at that forum, and last time I checked, that is far more than any other astrolger accept for one or two that have around half as many...maybe a few more than half... but I've only been questioned once in all those posts...and that was by a member that wanted to know what I believe are the justifications for using the trans-Saturian planets for Astrological Parts...and you and I both know that I certainly wasn't the first to do so and that they certainly are valid as we both have demonstrated and noted ...geeze...how many times do you think we've done that by now? Well whatever the number....however many ... It's a lot!
...and here's that link, 'On the Method of Applying Sabian Symbols to Astrological Parts'
http://actastrology.com/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=311