AppLeo
Well-known member
Sure I guess.
Does Materialistic Modern Science Have Limitations?
- Thread starter david starling
- Start date
Sure I guess.
Quote:
Originally Posted by david starling
Modern Materialistic Science co-opted the definition of "science", and now claims to be the sole arbiter of what is "real" and what is "pseudo" science. It's a Materialistic development of monotheism, with priest-like "scientists" performing their sacred ritual they call the "scientific method", revealing the laws of the One materialistic Universe and performing "scientific miracles". It's a very narrow minded version of Creation.
very accurate. at the base of Darwinism, for instance, is the continuing liturgy against theism of any sort. that is ,Darwinist evolution is claimed to be the only theory(though they like to call it a fact) that counters the creation of the world through supernatural means. this perspective has been verbalize by many Darwinist including Darwin himself through modern day darwinist.
Darwinism is in fact a myth as much as creationism. it has no scientific basis because all the evidence of its falsity is ignored or explained away by tautological nonsense .
rahu
Originally Posted by david starling
Modern Materialistic Science co-opted the definition of "science", and now claims to be the sole arbiter of what is "real" and what is "pseudo" science. It's a Materialistic development of monotheism, with priest-like "scientists" performing their sacred ritual they call the "scientific method", revealing the laws of the One materialistic Universe and performing "scientific miracles". It's a very narrow minded version of Creation.
very accurate. at the base of Darwinism, for instance, is the continuing liturgy against theism of any sort. that is ,Darwinist evolution is claimed to be the only theory(though they like to call it a fact) that counters the creation of the world through supernatural means. this perspective has been verbalize by many Darwinist including Darwin himself through modern day darwinist.
Darwinism is in fact a myth as much as creationism. it has no scientific basis because all the evidence of its falsity is ignored or explained away by tautological nonsense .
rahu