NSA Experts Say DNC ‘Hack’ Was Actually a Leak and Inside Job

P

PilgrimsProgress

Banned
I'm not a computer person by a long shot but can understand the basics of this discovery. When Julian Assange essentially said Seth Rich stole the DNC emails to give to Wikileaks, that's all I needed to hear. But if anyone needs a smoking gun (maybe not the best analogy given Seth's murder) these former NSA officials seem to have it. I doubt opposition media will report this unless a lot of other independent media sites do and it becomes too big a 'secret' to suppress.

Read Article
 
Kuntuzangmo

Kuntuzangmo

Well-known member
PilgrimsProgress said:
I'm not a computer person by a long shot but can understand the basics of this discovery. When Julian Assange essentially said Seth Rich stole the DNC emails to give to Wikileaks, that's all I needed to hear. But if anyone needs a smoking gun (maybe not the best analogy given Seth's murder) these former NSA officials seem to have it. I doubt opposition media will report this unless a lot of other independent media sites do and it becomes too big a 'secret' to suppress.

Read Article
Click to expand...

If they didn't do the actual investigation with access to actual materials and evidence involved, I'd take it all with a grain of salt. Anyone can speculate.
 
P

PilgrimsProgress

Banned
Kuntuzangmo said:
If they didn't do the actual investigation with access to actual materials and evidence involved, I'd take it all with a grain of salt. Anyone can speculate.
Click to expand...

People have gone to jail for murder when there was no body. Sometimes the circumstantial evidence is overwhelming.

(1) hard science shows that a remote hack of the DNC servers resulting in the breach that actually occurred would have been technologically impossible;
(2) forensic review of the initial Guccifer 2.0 documents proves that they are poorly-disguised cut-and-paste jobs–forgeries–intended to finger Russia.

On the evening of July 5, 2016, 1,976 megabytes of data were downloaded from the DNC’s server. The operation took 87 seconds. This yields a transfer rate of 22.7 megabytes per second. These statistics are matters of record and essential to disproving the hack theory. No Internet service provider, such as a hacker would have had to use in mid-2016, was capable of downloading data at this speed.”

A speed of 22.7 megabytes is simply unobtainable, especially if we are talking about a transoceanic data transfer. Transfer rates of 23 MB/s are not just highly unlikely, but effectively impossible to accomplish when communicating over the Internet at any significant distance. Further, local copy speeds are measured, demonstrating that 23 MB/s is a typical transfer rate when using a USB–2 flash device (thumb drive).

Julian Assange had a middle man in Washington DC who physically received the DNC emails. Unlikely a stack of thousands of pages! Thumb drive is easy to pocket.
 
Top