Vaccination astrology predictions

Abby83

Well-known member
There is no proven relation between vacs and autism, while it prevents millions of illnesses and thousands of deaths. Good thing if the school or health care requires it.

There is evidence. That evidence is seeing my son have terrets and spastisticity for 3 wks after having his vaccine. The severity of the symptoms went down with local produce fruit n veg and zinc and b supplements. Thlady who did the DNA has shown years of documentation of her clients showing DNA of those with autism. All of which had the same immediate reaction to the vaccine. That is evidence. She said it affects boys due to testerone but the vaccines affect the girl's immune system due to oestrogen. That's why mostly boys have autism.
 
Last edited:

Abby83

Well-known member
Genetic testing is a very expensive thing, and screening is superfluous, because there is no link between vaccines and autism. This claim has been disproved by thousands of independent studies spanning millions of case subjects.

But where are U reading these studies. Cos I mean I'm witnessing person after person experience otherwise. What U talk about may be written but I see with my own eyes
 

Abby83

Well-known member
That is what happens when you give the goverment too much control over your life, and when you let them run the health-care system. This is what happens when a society exchanges their freedom for a few benefits. Goverment gets to inject your kids with whatever thing they want, or not let them get treatment, or block medical innovation from being developed.

Welcome to conservative-libertarianism type of thinking. There is a reason many of us here in the forum advocate for limited goverment and free market, instead of having communist goverments in control of everything.

I agree. U know I don't know exactly what the govt plan on doing about this. But there is a high rise of mums with autistic kids right now. They are not coping one bit. You can't even get anyone to babysit these autistic kids cos they're too difficult. Mums Having to quit their jobs to look after their kid full time. So where will all these mums get their income? The govt? Just so U know the govt gives me $50 a week to be a carer of both my mum and son. Thats enough to cover my petrol only. And I can't work, cos I have too many appointments and little things I have to do to prevent this kid from bashing and hitting and screaming all afternoon or trying to jump in front of a car. This really doesn't look good. Too many ppl dependent on govt due to disabilities.
 
Last edited:

Dirius

Well-known member
I agree. U know I don't know exactly what the govt plan on doing about this. But there is a high rise of mums with autistic kids right now. They are not coping one bit. You can't even get anyone to babysit these autistic kids cos they're too difficult. Mums Having to quit their jobs to look after their kid full time. So where will all these mums get their income? The govt? Just so U know the govt gives me $50 a week to be a carer of both my mum and son. Thats enough to cover my petrol only. And I can't work, cos I have too many appointments and little things I have to do to prevent this kid from bashing and hitting and screaming all afternoon or trying to jump in front of a car. This really doesn't look good. Too many ppl dependent on govt due to disabilities.

Well your solution would be to sue the goverment for trespassing on your individual liberties, considering they forced you into a medical decision by threats that would have prevented your children from getting an education.

You are from Australia right? I mean if you look at the website of the department of health in your country they clearly state that:
https://beta.health.gov.au/health-topics/immunisation/about-immunisation/are-vaccines-safe
-"Serious reactions like allergic reactions are extremely rare. If your body reacts in an unexpected way, seek medical advice straight away.
If you have any concerns about potential side effects of vaccines, talk to your doctor or nurse."

This pretty much means the goverment forced you into a decision, despite clearly stating there can be risks involved. If a procedure has risks, then you as a free individual should be entitled to refuse it.
------------


That being said, I wouldn't recommend you to do anything of the sort, the last thing you would want is a lawsuit that would cost you money, only to have it thrown away by a corrupt judge, and even risking public shaming.

I does surprise me though that anti-vaccine groups, or families who were put in the same situation as yours never really launched a massive joint lawsuit against the goverment for such a thing. I mean, it is probably in the thousands, and strength does come in numbers.
 

Abby83

Well-known member
Well your solution would be to sue the goverment for trespassing on your individual liberties, considering they forced you into a medical decision by threats that would have prevented your children from getting an education.

You are from Australia right? I mean if you look at the website of the department of health in your country they clearly state that:
https://beta.health.gov.au/health-topics/immunisation/about-immunisation/are-vaccines-safe
-"Serious reactions like allergic reactions are extremely rare. If your body reacts in an unexpected way, seek medical advice straight away.
If you have any concerns about potential side effects of vaccines, talk to your doctor or nurse."

This pretty much means the goverment forced you into a decision, despite clearly stating there can be risks involved. If a procedure has risks, then you as a free individual should be entitled to refuse it.
------------


That being said, I wouldn't recommend you to do anything of the sort, the last thing you would want is a lawsuit that would cost you money, only to have it thrown away by a corrupt judge, and even risking public shaming.

I does surprise me though that anti-vaccine groups, or families who were put in the same situation as yours never really launched a massive joint lawsuit against the goverment for such a thing. I mean, it is probably in the thousands, and strength does come in numbers.

I think the question for me is - what the hell do we do about it?

Certain politicians are being tipped off to promote the flu shot and vaccines. I sent an email to my local MP about what happened and the I urge for further investigation into vaccines. I did not get a reply. If the govt is corrupt regarding the matter, how do we gain power? As for other mums - the majority still believe the vaccines had nothing to do with it. They're in denial and refuse to believe their govt or big pharma would do that. Look at my husband. He saw our son get vaccine injured and still says vaccines are good. Why? For him, it's more to do with authority. He thinks if the dr or govt says so than we should do it. He thinks anything else is a conspiracy theory. It's pure ignorance. So exactly how do we beat these fuc**rs before the world is disabled.

I'm part of an autism group on Facebook. A small number of us mums have commented on how nutrition and supplements have drastically improved our autistic children. But the other mums become outraged (god knows why). And our comments also get removed. Why? I'm told by the admins that it's giving a false sense of a cure. So I'm not even allowed to share my success story cos apparently it offends the other mums. But they carry on crying about their struggles daily.
 
Last edited:

Abby83

Well-known member
And just so you know, 50% of the boys in my son's class and my twin's classes have autism and the teachers are struggling with it too.
 

Abby83

Well-known member
Another note - there is a homeopathic group in Australia (I can't remember the name though) that specialise in CURING autism. They apparently reverse the vaccine. I haven't tried it cos they don't have it in the state I live but there's evidence they have cured children with autism over the past 20 years.
 
Last edited:

Dirius

Well-known member
I think the question for me is - what the hell do we do about it?

Certain politicians are being tipped off to promote the flu shot and vaccines. I sent an email to my local MP about what happened and the I urge for further investigation into vaccines. I did not get a reply. If the govt is corrupt regarding the matter, how do we gain power? As for other mums - the majority still believe the vaccines had nothing to do with it. They're in denial and refuse to believe their govt or big pharma would do that. Look at my husband. He saw our son get vaccine injured and still says vaccines are good. Why? For him, it's more to do with authority. He thinks if the dr or govt says so than we should do it. He thinks anything else is a conspiracy theory. It's pure ignorance. So exactly how do we beat these fuc**rs before the world is disabled.

I'm part of an autism group on Facebook. A small number of us mums have commented on how nutrition and supplements have drastically improved our autistic children. But the other mums become outraged (god knows why). And our comments also get removed. Why? I'm told by the admins that it's giving a false sense of a cure. So I'm not even allowed to share my success story cos apparently it offends the other mums. But they carry on crying about their struggles daily.
The example of your husband, like him, I do believe vaccines are good. They do more good than they do harm. The problem is not the risk, rather the lack of incentive for an alternative.

I mean vaccines work for 99% of the people without problem. The thing is that there is no incentive for a lab to create an alternative vaccine that is safer, which would be marketed for the 1% of people that can't use the regular vaccination method. Why would there be one? if the goverment just forces that 1% to use the vaccine that would harm them in the first place?

Problem is this escaltes, and the more time passes, the more harmful chemicals they use in vaccines, so suddenly that 1% becomes a 5%, and then a 10% and so on, because people do not question what the goverment says. There are a huge number of doctors who try to explain the same thing I'm explaining, that while vaccines do good, they can still be harmful. But this people are usually silenced and shamed for stating an objective fact.

-------------------------------

The problem is that we have allowed the goverment to take over our daily lives, in exchange for little benefits, most of them things we don't really need. We allow the goverment to trample over our rights. And the main right they try to trample is destroying the family, and the rights of parents.

Look around the world:

- Children recieving hormone therapy, which is risky, despite parental objection but at the goverment's instigation (who side with activists). Kids that are 10 or 11 year old being injected with lethal hormones that will cause cancer, against the will of the parents.

- Goverments promoting 7 or 8 month abortions, trying to kill viable human beings and prevent them from being born; telling women that it is for the best.

- Destroying our culture and traditions: suddenly at some point teaching our children the value of family, the love for one's country, honor and loyalty became hateful racist theorems.

And all of these things... using our own money, which they tax each year, almost up to a 50% of the money we earn each year. The case of vaccination is the same: the force you vaccinate your kids, and by doing so they remove the incentive for scientists to develop a better alternative.
 
Last edited:

Dirius

Well-known member
Another note - there is a naturopathic group in Australia (I can't remember the name though) that specialise in CURING autism. They apparently reverse the vaccine. I haven't tried it cos they don't have it in the state I live but there's evidence they have cured children with autism over the past 20 years.
I'm aware that treatment for autism has improved in the past decades, but I have no idea to what extent. So I can't really comment on that. My suggestion is check it out, get informed about what it is. I mean, I hope it works, and probably works better the younger the patient is (while they are still developing).
 

conspiracy theorist

Well-known member
Another note - there is a naturopathic group in Australia (I can't remember the name though) that specialise in CURING autism. They apparently reverse the vaccine. I haven't tried it cos they don't have it in the state I live but there's evidence they have cured children with autism over the past 20 years.

Do you have access to the evidence? I'd be interested to find out more.
 

Abby83

Well-known member
The example of your husband, like him, I do believe vaccines are good. They do more good than they do harm. The problem is not the risk, rather the lack of incentive for an alternative.

I mean vaccines work for 99% of the people without problem. The thing is that there is no incentive for a lab to create an alternative vaccine that is safer, which would be marketed for the 1% of people that can't use the regular vaccination method. Why would there be one? if the goverment just forces that 1% to use the vaccine that would harm them in the first place?

Problem is this escaltes, and the more time passes, the more harmful chemicals they use in vaccines, so suddenly that 1% becomes a 5%, and then a 10% and so on, because people do not question what the goverment says. There are a huge number of doctors who try to explain the same thing I'm explaining, that while vaccines do good, they can still be harmful. But this people are usually silenced and shamed for stating an objective fact.

-------------------------------

The problem is that we have allowed the goverment to take over our daily lives, in exchange for little benefits, most of them things we don't really need. We allow the goverment to trample over our rights. And the main right they try to trample is destroying the family, and the rights of parents.

Look around the world:

- Children recieving hormone therapy, which is risky, despite parental objection but at the goverment's instigation (who side with activists). Kids that are 10 or 11 year old being injected with lethal hormones that will cause cancer, against the will of the parents.

- Goverments promoting 7 or 8 month abortions, trying to kill viable human beings and prevent them from being born; telling women that it is for the best.

- Destroying our culture and traditions: suddenly at some point teaching our children the value of family, the love for one's country, honor and loyalty became hateful racist theorems.

And all of these things... using our own money, which they tax each year, almost up to a 50% of the money we earn each year. The case of vaccination is the same: the force you vaccinate your kids, and by doing so they remove the incentive for scientists to develop a better alternative.

It's not 1% anymore. More like 50%.
 

rahu

Banned
Genetic testing is a very expensive thing, and screening is superfluous, because there is no link between vaccines and autism. This claim has been disproved by thousands of independent studies spanning millions of case subjects.

you are a flat out right lying troll. vaccines are not tested. that is a major point of contention. there are no millions of case subjects
the protocols of Nuremburg trials of the nazi medical experiments at the end of ww11, said it is a WAR CRIME to force medical experiments of unconsenting individuals
rahu
 

Abby83

Well-known member
you are a flat out right lying troll. vaccines are not tested. that is a major point of contention. there are no millions of case subjects
the protocols of Nuremburg trials of the nazi medical experiments at the end of ww11, said it is a WAR CRIME to force medical experiments of unconsenting individuals
rahu

What Rahu is saying is true.
 

rahu

Banned
http://humansarefree.com/2019/05/us-vax-court-sees-400-spike-in-vaccine.html

US Vax Court Sees 400% Spike in Vaccine Injuries - Biggest Payout Goes to Flu Shot

Vaccine injury cases are on the rise people, so if you’ve got your head in the sand and you haven’t been paying attention, it’s time to wake up.

Here’s a little background for those of you just getting started.

By Lori Martin Gregory, Guest writer

Ronnie Reagan… almost 30 years ago to the day, the 40th president of the United States signed away the rights of Americans to sue vaccine makers, replacing them with a law that forces families who have suffered vaccine injury or death to sue the U.S. government instead of a pharmaceutical company.



As a result, special masters from the United States Special Claims Court, also known for our purposes as the vaccine court, are given full authority as judge with no jury to decide the fate of Americans who have had the unfortunate ‘luck’ to be stricken by a vaccine injury — which can range from chronic, mild symptoms to death.

Once a year, this non-traditional court provides the public with a glimpse into its inner workings, by issuing an annual report on its website — a ritual that happens every January.

The report is sent to the President of Congress, otherwise known as the Vice President of the United States, where it is intended to serve as a bell weather monitoring reactions the American public may be having to vaccinations that are increasingly becoming forced by government mandates around the country.

Great, right? Accountability in action?

Wrong.

The report, which is consistently ignored by mainstream media/politicians/health officials and the CDC, lies dormant on the reports page of the U.S. Special Claims Court website.

No headlines, no press release, no analysis, no alert the media, no nothing.

No surprise, given that most people in America don’t even know that vaccines were ruled to be unavoidably unsafe by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2011.

Also no surprise, that mainstream, co-opted, globalist elite media constantly ignore this report, along with sane arguments made by health freedom advocates about the dangers and risks of vaccine injury (‘look! a unicorn!’), instead using terms like ‘the science is in,’ and vaccine risk has been ‘debunked,’ to deter rational discussion pertaining to evidence that is hiding in plain sight.

Also no surprise that the U.S. Special Claims Court offers up an ineffective, low tech, archaic version of the report every year. Instead of a nice, sort-able spread sheet, the court posts a scanned PDF document — a format which requires labor-intensive activities to conduct any sort of concrete analysis.

One must either re-data-entry all 220+ pages which would take weeks, or conduct an extensive, hand-written breakdown by vaccine of each case, combined with extensive tallying and organization efforts in order to identify statistical relevance and trends emerging from the vaccine court.

Is this by design? Perhaps. Most definitely it is at the very least a deterrent from having anybody actually sit down and try to analyze the **** thing.

Which is exactly why we do it, every year since 2014. Not to be deterred, it took us 10 months to finally finish our analysis of this year’s report.

But once we did, the trends we found were shocking — not just because of what they revealed about the continual increase in vaccine injury, but also because of the deafening silence present among the halls of mainstream media, as vaccine injury continues to be a subject that journalists and media outlets ignore — chalking it up to yet another conspiracy theory from yet another fake news site.

Well pull up a chair and hold on to your hats, because guess what we discovered:




  1. Vaccine court settlement payouts increased in total $91.2 million in 2015, up from $22.8 million in 2014 to $114 million in 2015 — a 400% increase.
  2. Vaccine court settlement payments for flu shots increased the most, from $4.9 million in 2014 to $61 million in 2015 — an increase of more than 1000%, despite autumnal onslaughts every year of media/pr/advertising campaigns urging Americans to ‘get your flu shot,’ with total abandon for the statistical facts coming out of the vaccine court.
  3. Varicella (chicken pox) had the third biggest increase — from $0 in 2014 to $5.8 million in 2015. (No surprise shingles is on the rise among the elderly population, as recently vaccinated grandchildren continuously shed live virus to their unsuspecting elders.)
  4. Hepatitis B was the fourth largest increase in vaccine court settlements, increasing 321% in 2015 to more than $8 million in 2015 from $1.9 million in 2014.
  5. TDap/DTP/DPT and D/T shots were the fifth largest increase, leaping 75% in 2014 from $5.5 million to $9.8.


The rest of the settlements not pictured here are: Tetanus, $4 million; HPV $3.4 million, up from almost nothing in 2014 (one to watch in January when the 2016 report is issued); MMR, which actually decreased from the number one position last year to under $1 m — an 88%+ decrease in payouts; pertussis, $1.7 million; thimerisol $1.5 million; HIB, $345k, menginococal $500k, HEP A $408k, DPT & Polio, $210k & rotovirus $76k.

You may have noticed we omitted the second place winner, ‘other.’ Here’s why.

‘Other’ illustrates perfectly the dodgy nature of the vaccine court report, and its lack of transparency in the vaccine court process. Instead of identifying which combination of vaccines are being charged with injury or death and labeling the case accordingly, a special master can decide to label a vaccine case ‘other,’ thereby diluting its affect on the overall numbers in the final analysis.

In 2015, the ‘other’ category was the second largest increase in vaccine settlement payments, totaling $21.5 million in payouts, up 388% from $4.4 million in payouts the year before.

We’re not accusing anybody of anything. But, 388% increase is a lot. What combination of vaccines is causing such an increase? Doesn’t the public have a right to know?

If the court decided, for example, that there were too many flu shot settlements mounting for the year, couldn’t it simply skew the data by categorizing certain cases as ‘other,’ which would artificially deflate the flu category?

Did we mention that these results are ONLY for the judgements — cases that are found in favor of the plaintiff.

It does NOT include the EXTENSIVE legal fees for both sides, which are paid for by the U.S. government whether the lawyer wins or loses the case? Those are categorized as costs.

And instead of submitting them in the report along with any judgments that are awarded, often they are entered as separate entries, making the exercise of linking them with their judgement payouts that much harder, requiring yet another step in the arduous, analysis of data.

The total dollar payout of legal fees for the vaccine court in 2015 is $42 million.

Also, a hand full of settlements in the payout are based on annuities — that means that the payouts (many of which total more than $1 million) reoccur annually.

That’s because life as they knew it for some plaintiffs disappeared after their vaccine injury occurred, and the costs to care for them in perpetuity for the life of the plaintiff requires an annual sum that is often extensive.

Share far and wide people, it’s time to turn the tide.





 

rahu

Banned
https://www.healthnutnews.com/japan...ndates-and-no-mmr-vaccine-healthier-children/
Japan Leads the Way: No Vaccine Mandates and No MMR Vaccine = Healthier Children
The Promise of Good Health; Are We Jumping Off the Cliff in the U.S.?

By Kristina Kristen, CHD Guest Writer


The Nuremberg Code of ethics established the necessity of informed consent without “any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion.” Forcing the MMR vaccine, or any other vaccine, on those who are uninformed or who do not consent represents nothing less than medical tyranny.
*Article originally appeared at
Children’s Health Defense. Reposted with permission( according to The Nuremberg Code of ethics, without informed consent, this is a war crime rahu)


In the United States, many legislators and public health officials are busy trying to make vaccines de facto compulsory—either by removing parental/personal choice given by existing vaccine exemptions or by imposing undue quarantines and fines on those who do not comply with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC’s) vaccine edicts. Officials in California are seeking to override medical opinion about fitness for vaccination, while those in New York are mandating the measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine for 6-12-month-old infants for whom its safety and effectiveness “have not been established.”

The U.S. has the very highest infant mortality rate of all industrialized countries, with more American children dying at birth and in their first year than in any other comparable nation—and more than half of those who survive develop at least one chronic illness.

American children would be better served if these officials—before imposing questionable and draconian measures—studied child health outcomes in Japan. With a population of 127 million, Japan has the healthiest children and the very highest “healthy life expectancy” in the world—and the least vaccinated children of any developed country. The U.S., in contrast, has the developed world’s most aggressive vaccination schedule in number and timing, starting at pregnancy, at birth and in the first two years of life. Does this make U.S. children healthier? The clear answer is no. The U.S. has the very highest infant mortality rate of all industrialized countries, with more American children dying at birth and in their first year than in any other comparable nation—and more than half of those who survive develop at least one chronic illness. Analysis of real-world infant mortality and health results shows that U.S. vaccine policy does not add up to a win for American children.
Japan and the U.S.; Two Different Vaccine Policies

In 1994, Japan transitioned away from mandated vaccination in public health centers to voluntary vaccination in doctors’ offices, guided by “the concept that it is better that vaccinations are performed by children’s family doctors who are familiar with their health conditions.” The country created two categories of non-compulsory vaccines: “routine” vaccines that the government covers and “strongly recommends” but does not mandate, and additional “voluntary” vaccines, generally paid for out-of-pocket. Unlike in the U.S., Japan has no vaccine requirements for children entering preschool or elementary school.
Japan also banned the MMR vaccine in the same time frame, due to thousands of serious injuriesover a four-year period—producing an injury rate of one in 900 children that was “over 2,000 times higher than the expected rate.” It initially offered separate measles and rubella vaccines following its abandonment of the MMR vaccine; Japan now recommends a combined measles-rubella (MR) vaccine for routine use but still shuns the MMR. The mumps vaccine is in the “voluntary” category.
Here are key differences between the Japanese and U.S. vaccine programs:

  • Japan has no vaccine mandates, instead recommending vaccines that (as discussed above) are either “routine” (covered by insurance) or “voluntary” (self-pay).
  • Japan does not vaccinate newborns with the hepatitis B (HepB) vaccine, unless the mother is hepatitis B positive.
  • Japan does not vaccinate pregnant mothers with the tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine.
  • Japan does not give flu shots to pregnant mothers or to six-month-old infants.
  • Japan does not give the MMR vaccine, instead recommending an MR vaccine.
  • Japan does not require the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine.
No other developed country administers as many vaccine doses in the first two years of life.

Screen-Shot-2019-04-23-at-4.58.23-PM-1-911x1024.png


In contrast, the U.S. vaccine schedule (see Table 1) prescribes routine vaccination during pregnancy, calls for the first HepB vaccine dose within 24 hours of birth—even though 99.9% of pregnant women, upon testing, are hepatitis B negative, and follows up with 20 to 22 vaccine doses in the first year alone. No other developed country administers as many vaccine doses in the first two years of life.
The HepB vaccine injects a newborn with a 250-microgram load of aluminum, a neurotoxic and immune-toxic adjuvant used to provoke an immune response. There are no studies to back up the safety of exposing infants to such high levels of the injected metal. In fact, the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA’s) upper limit for aluminum in intravenous (IV) fluids for newborns is far lower at five micrograms per kilogram per day (mcg/kg/day)—and even at these levels, researchers have documented the potential for impaired neurologic development. For an average newborn weighing 7.5 pounds, the HepB vaccine has over 15 times more aluminum than the FDA’s upper limit for IV solutions.
Unlike Japan, the U.S. administers flu and Tdap vaccines to pregnant women (during any trimester) and babies receive flu shots at six months of age, continuing every single year thereafter. Manufacturers have never tested the safety of flu shots administered during pregnancy, and the FDA has never formally licensed any vaccines “specifically for use during pregnancy to protect the infant.”
Japan initially recommended the HPV vaccine but stopped doing so in 2013 after serious health problems prompted numerous lawsuits. Japanese researchers have since confirmed a temporal relationship between HPV vaccination and recipients’ development of symptoms.

U.S. vaccine proponents claim the U.S. vaccine schedule is similar to schedules in other developed countries, but this claim is inaccurate upon scrutiny. Most other countries do not recommend vaccination during pregnancy, and very few vaccinate on the first day of life. This is important because the number, type and timing of exposure to vaccines can greatly influence their adverse impact on developing fetuses and newborns, who are particularly vulnerable to toxic exposures and early immune activation. Studies show that activation of pregnant women’s immune systems can cause developmental problems in their offspring. Why are pregnant women in the U.S. advised to protect their developing fetuses by avoiding alcohol and mercury-containing tuna fish, but actively prompted to receive immune-activating Tdap and flu vaccines, which still contain mercury (in multi-dose vials) and other untested substances?
Japan initially recommended the HPV vaccine but stopped doing so in 2013 after serious health problems prompted numerous lawsuits. Japanese researchers have since confirmed a temporal relationship between HPV vaccination and recipients’ development of symptoms. U.S. regulators have ignored these and similar reports and not only continue to aggressively promote and even mandate the formerly optional HPV vaccine beginning in preadolescence but are now pushing it in adulthood. The Merck-manufactured HPV vaccine received fast-tracked approval from the FDA despite half of all clinical trial subjects reporting serious medical conditions within seven months.
Screen-Shot-2019-04-23-at-4.58.53-PM-1024x711.png

Best and Worst: Two Different Infant Mortality Results

The CDC views infant mortality as one of the most important indicators of a society’s overall health. The agency should take note of Japan’s rate, which, at 2 infant deaths per 1,000 live births, is the second lowest in the world, second only to the Principality of Monaco. In comparison, almost three times as many American infants die (5.8 per 1,000 live births), despite massive per capita spending on health care for children (see Table 2). U.S. infant mortality ranks behind 55 other countries and is worse than the rate in Latvia, Slovakia or Cuba.
If vaccines save lives, why are American children dying at a faster rate, and…dying younger compared to children in 19 other wealthy countries—translating into a 57 percent greater risk of death before reaching adulthood?

To reiterate, the U.S. has the most aggressive vaccine schedule of developed countries (administering the most vaccines the earliest). If vaccines save lives, why are American children “dying at a faster rate, and…dying younger” compared to children in 19 other wealthy countries—translating into a “57 percent greater risk of death before reaching adulthood”? Japanese children, who receive the fewest vaccines—with no government mandates for vaccination—grow up to enjoy “long and vigorous” lives. International infant mortality and health statistics and their correlation to vaccination protocols show results that government and health officials are ignoring at our children’s great peril.
Among the 20 countries with the world’s best infant mortality outcomes, only three countries (Hong Kong, Macau and Singapore) automatically administer the HepB vaccine to all newborns—governed by the rationale that hepatitis B infection is highly endemic in these countries. Most of the other 17 top-ranking countries—including Japan—give the HepB vaccine at birth only if the mother is hepatitis B positive (Table 1). The U.S., with its disgraceful #56 infant mortality ranking, gives the HepB vaccine to all four million babies born annually despite a low incidence of hepatitis B.
Is the U.S. Sacrificing Children’s Health for Profits?

Merck, the MMR vaccine’s manufacturer, is in court over MMR-related fraud. Whistleblowers allege the pharmaceutical giant rigged its efficacy data for the vaccine’s mumps component to ensure its continued market monopoly. The whistleblower evidence has given rise to two separate court cases. In addition, a CDC whistleblower has alleged the MMR vaccine increases autism risks in some children. Others have reported that the potential risk of permanent injury from the MMR vaccine dwarfs the risks of getting measles.
Why do the FDA and CDC continue to endorse the problematic MMR vaccine despite Merck’s implication in fraud over the vaccine’s safety and efficacy? Why do U.S. legislators and government officials not demand a better alternative, as Japan did over two decades ago? Why are U.S. cities and states forcing Merck’s MMR vaccine on American children? Is the U.S. government protecting children, or Merck? Why are U.S. officials ignoring Japan’s exemplary model, which proves that the most measured vaccination program in the industrialized world and “first-class sanitation and levels of nutrition” can produce optimal child health outcomes that are leading the world?
A central tenet of a free and democratic society is the freedom to make informed decisions about medical interventions that carry serious potential risks. This includes the right to be apprised of benefits and risks—and the ability to say no. The Nuremberg Code of ethics established the necessity of informed consent without “any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion.” Forcing the MMR vaccine, or any other vaccine, on those who are uninformed or who do not consent represents nothing less than medical tyranny.
*Article originally appeared at Children’s Health Defense. Reposted with permission.
 
Last edited:
Top