Astrologers' Community  

Go Back   Astrologers' Community > Anything Else... > Chat > Hot topic arena

Hot topic arena As the title suggest, this sub-board is dedicated to non-astrological talks on interesting, important or controversial topics.

Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 04-24-2019, 08:55 PM
rahu rahu is offline
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: 5025 valley crest dr #135 concord ca 94521
Posts: 10,860
Re: The Mossad


Originally Posted by PilgrimsProgress
1) If you think the words “Israel,” “Zionists,” and “Jews” are interchangeable, you may be antisemitic.

2) If you think that a Jewish conspiracy controls the media/international finance/politics/lobbies, you are antisemitic. There is no conspiracy, end of argument.

3) If you use the term “Rothschild” to involve “Jews,” you are an antisemite. And congratulations by the way for the exact use of the same phrases that the Nazis and those who incited tsarist pogroms.

4) If your only defense is “Jews are not a race, so I’m not racist” or “Jews are not the only Semites, so I’m not an antisemite,” then you’re probably an antisemite.

5) If you think/demand that the Jews should condemn Israel with every word, tweets, and comments, you are an antisemite (see point 1).

6) Supporting the legitimate Palestinian desire for self-determination to enforce human rights and having its own state, and condemning the policies of the Israeli government does not in itself make someone an antisemite (but see points 1-5).

7) If you talk about Palestine whenever we talk about crimes against Jews/Antisemitism/Holocaust, you’re most certainly an antisemite.

8) If you use violence instilled in Palestine by the Israeli government as an excuse to turn away from conversations about antisemitism and violence suffered by Jews, you are not just an antisemite, but you are instrumentalising Palestine and the Palestinian suffering, of which you really do not care.

9) If you think that any Jewish person, or even any Israeli Jew, is guilty of the crimes of the State of Israel and human rights violations, you are an antisemite and also very likely a hypocrite living in a country who has committed many crimes and human rights violations against colonised countries and you do not expect to be held responsible for the violence and oppression of your own country. Watch your consistency.

10) If you use word "Jew" as an adjective or a verb (like "Jew money" or "He Jewed me down twenty dollars."), you might be an anti-Semite

Israel: Murder is “Standard Procedure”

VT Editors -

April 23, 2019 4

RT – by Rainer Rupp
(Rainer Rupp was the former top NATO spy for the DDR)
Jewish settlers execute a Palestinian lying on the ground. Israeli soldiers destroy the evidence. No one investigates the cold-blooded murder. This is the standard procedure in Israel. But our media repeat the lies like parrots.
Let’s start with the facts as presented by the Jewish-Israeli journalist Yossi Gurvitz on 17 April 2019 on the Israel critical US Jewish website Mondoweis:
About two weeks ago, on April 3, the Palestinian Muhammad Abed Al-Fatah, a resident of the village of Khirbat Qais, threw stones at several passing cars with Israeli license plates on the thoroughfare of the Beita village square. A Jewish settler named Yehoshua Sherman fired several shots at 23-year-old Abed Al-Fatah from his vehicle. Then Sherman and another person left the vehicle and approached Abed Al-Fatah, who took cover in front of them. Sherman and the other Israeli shot the Palestinian again and injured him. The two shooters then approached the bleeding and unarmed Al-Fatah, lying on the ground, to execute him with further shots at close range.
According to Yossi Gurvitz, up to this point everything went according to the “Standard Operating Procedure” of the Israelis for such situations.
Immediately afterwards, the spokesman for the Israeli Armed Forces, officially called the Israeli Defence Forces (IDF), announced that the Palestinian Abed Al-Fatah had been “killed in a knife attack”.
  • But there was no knife and no knife attack. But that didn’t matter. The IDF spokesman is used to lying when it comes to Palestinians.
    So far everything according to the “standard procedure“.
    The Israeli media then portrayed the murder as a thwarted knife attack, just as the IDF spokesman wanted.
    So much for the “standard procedure.
    Since then, there has been no evidence that the two shooters were arrested, interrogated or investigated by Israeli police on the street for this murder, even though one person was killed.
    But then something happened that differs from the “standard procedure“, at least that is what Yossi Gurvitz sees. The IDF soldiers broke into two shops near the crime scene and confiscated two video cameras from the security system, checked the contents of the recordings and deleted them.
    All this became known in a report by the Israeli human rights organization B’Tselem, which once again does the job of the Israeli media, prosecutors and police, who are the opposite of investigative when it comes to crimes against Palestinians.
    Nor did the IDF soldiers detain the Israeli shooters as required by Israeli law. But that was to be expected, because laws are only effective if the law enforcement authorities enforce them. “Moreover, the vast majority of Israeli soldiers do not even know that they have the right and in such cases even the duty to arrest Jewish settlers,” said Yossi Gurvitz. On the other hand, the Israeli soldiers had obviously shown great initiative in this case when it came to confiscating and destroying the video evidence of the murder. This was quite obviously the lesson the IDF soldiers had learned from the so-called Azaria affair: Destroy the cameras!
    The background to this affair: the Israeli soldier Elor Azaria shot the Palestinian Abdel Al-Sharif three years ago, who had previously stabbed an Israeli soldier. Azaria came to the scene eleven minutes after the knife attack and shot a bullet in the head of Al-Sharif, who was wounded and lying on the ground. Azaria had the misfortune to be filmed by a B’Tselem camera.
    After the murder – and the shooting of a wounded, unarmed person is a murder in all civilized countries – the powerful right-wing extremist scene in Israel, with strong political support from the ruling parties, began a propaganda campaign against the arrest of the soldier Azaria. She warned that soldiers would now hesitate to shoot terrorists. Azaria finally escaped with a ridiculously low sentence, which he will certainly turn into a large fortune. For he is considered by the Israeli racists to be a great hero who has shown how it must be done.
    The IDF soldiers have now internalised the doctrine of destroying cameras and other evidence in the vicinity of crime scenes. In the current case of the murder of Abed Al-Fatah, however, the question arises as to why the soldiers deleted the videos even though the crime was committed not by the soldiers themselves but by settlers? The left-wing Jewish-Israeli journalist Gurvitz cites two reasons for this:
    First, the soldiers grew up in a country possessed by “Hasbara“. “Anything that impairs Israel’s image must be suppressed. And secondly, the settlers are just another arm of the Israeli regime. Just like the journalists who didn’t take the trouble to check the bulletin of the IDF spokesman. They didn’t need instructions. They have known their role for a long time. Everyone is working towards the same goal,” Gurvitz said. And alluding to the lying but widespread phrase of the western Israel apologists of the allegedly “only democracy in the Middle East“, journalist says resignedly, it would unfortunately happen in the “only Jewish military dictatorship in the world“.

    Bernie Sanders: Netanyahu a Rightwing Racist

    VT Editors -

    April 23, 2019 5

    Russia Today: Democratic 2020 hopeful Bernie Sanders called the government of Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu “racist” during a CNN town hall. Another blue candidate, Beto O’Rourke, used similar wording to blast the Israeli leader.

    Speaking on Monday, the popular Vermont senator was asked to comment on how his long-standing criticism of Netanyahu – who this month won a highly contested election and secured his fifth term as prime minister – was compatible with supporting Israel.
    “I am not anti-Israel but the fact of the matter is that Netanyahu is a right-wing politician who, I think, is treating the Palestinian people extremely unfairly,” Sanders said as the audience burst in applause.
    “So what I believe is the United States gives billions of dollars in military aid to Israel. What I believe is not radical. I just believe that the United States should deal with the Middle East on a level playing field basis. In other words, the goal must be to try to bring people together and not just support one country, which is now run by a right-wing, dare I say, racist government,” he added.
    Prior to the election in Israel, Sanders said he hoped Netanyahu would lose. “When election time comes in Israel, he always tries going even further to the right by appealing to racism within Israel, I think it’s unfortunate,” he said at the time. The remark was in response to Netanyahu’s pledge to annex the illegal Jewish settlements in occupied Palestinian lands to Israel after being reelected.
    Another Democratic hopeful, Beto O’Rourke, leveled similar criticism at the Israeli prime minister on the campaign trail in Iowa. The former Texas representative said the US-Israeli relationship “must transcend partisanship in the United States, and it must be able to transcend a prime minister who is racist as he warns about Arabs coming to the polls, who wants to defy any prospect for peace as he threatens to annex the West Bank and who has sided with a far-right racist party in order to maintain his hold on power.”
    Other Democratic candidates who have directly criticized Netanyahu in recent months include Elizabeth Warren and Amy Klobuchar.

Last edited by rahu; 05-07-2019 at 02:24 AM.
Reply With Quote
Unread 05-10-2019, 10:31 PM
rahu rahu is offline
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: 5025 valley crest dr #135 concord ca 94521
Posts: 10,860
Re: The Mossad

Rise and Kill First: The Secret History of Israel’s Targeted Assassinations

New Book exposes targeted assassinations have been used countless times by the Rogue Nation of Israel
Johnny Punish -

April 29, 2018 1

Just finished watching Fareed Zakaria interview author Ronen Bergman about his new book “Rise and Kill First: The Secret History of Israel’s Targeted Assassinations“.
It was a bit weird; disconnected. Instead of being out-raged, Fareed was more giddy; a fan if you will. Instead of outlining this out law behavior as an outlier and egregious, he seemed enamored.
CNN’s Fareed Zakaria I could be reading that wrong but it just seemed too softballish considering that, we the American taxpayer fund these assassinations! We expect better! We demand better!
This assassination stuff is NOT cool by any means! I am NOT naive and live in the real world but in our newly connected 21st century, we cannot go on being so un-evolved and stuck in 20th James Bond dogma!
Pretending Israel has rights to murder other leaders with impunity because it is what? What right does it have? And to get tacit support from a main stream media talking head that so many politicos watch.. well, that’s so not cool. Come on Fareed!
Anyway, this new book, according to the NEW YORK TIMES, is the The first definitive history of the Mossad, Shin Bet, and the IDF’s targeted killing programs. They hail it as “an exceptional work, a humane book about an incendiary subject.”

The Talmud says:
“If someone comes to kill you, rise up and kill him first.”
This instinct to take every measure, even the most aggressive, to defend the Jewish people is hardwired into Israel’s DNA.
  • Sponsored

    From the very beginning of its colonial stolen statehood in 1948, protecting the rogue nation from harm has been the responsibility of its intelligence community and armed services (paid for by US taxpayers), and there is one weapon in their vast arsenal that they have relied upon to insure stolen lands can go on without rebuke;
    Targeted assassinations have been used countless times, on enemies large and small, sometimes in response to attacks against the Israeli people and sometimes preemptively.
    Buy on In this page-turning, eye-opening book, journalist and military analyst Ronen Bergman—praised by David Remnick as “arguably [Israel’s] best investigative reporter”—offers a riveting inside account of the targeted killing programs: their successes, their failures, and the moral and political price exacted on the men and women who approved and carried out the missions.
    Bergman has gained the exceedingly rare cooperation of many current and former members of the Israeli government, including Prime Ministers Shimon Peres, Ehud Barak, Ariel Sharon, and Benjamin Netanyahu, as well as high-level figures in the country’s military and intelligence services: the IDF (Israel Defense Forces), the Mossad (the world’s most feared intelligence agency), Caesarea (a “Mossad within the Mossad” that carries out attacks on the highest-value targets), and the Shin Bet (an internal security service that implemented the largest targeted assassination campaign ever, in order to stop what had once appeared to be unstoppable: suicide terrorism).

    Including never-before-reported, behind-the-curtain accounts of key operations, and based on hundreds of on-the-record interviews and thousands of files to which Bergman has gotten exclusive access over his decades of reporting, Rise and Kill First brings us deep into the heart of Israel’s most secret activities.
Bergman traces, from stolen statehood to the present, the gripping events and thorny ethical questions underlying Israel’s targeted killing campaign, which has shaped the Israeli rogue nation, the Middle East, and the entire world.
“A remarkable feat of fearless and responsible reporting . . . important, timely, and informative.”—John le Carré
Reply With Quote
Unread 05-15-2019, 10:56 PM
rahu rahu is offline
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: 5025 valley crest dr #135 concord ca 94521
Posts: 10,860
Re: The Mossad


Resurrecting the ancient Israelites from the Valley of Dry Bones
by geneticist Dr. Eran Elhaik
[ Editor’s Note: VT has known Israeli geneticist Eran Elhaik since 2013, when we spotted the Jewish genome work he was doing at Johns Hopkins.
Eran Elhaik We noted right away that he was another of the many academics who does not let ideology and politics influence his scientific research, which is always a breath of fresh air in the geopolitical sewer that VT has to swim in every day.
His work was politically controversial but solid, and he was able to defend it from the shills that attempted to discredit it.
In short, his work showed that Ashkenazic Jews have about as much “people of the land” DNA as some Europeans have Neanderthal DNA. But Europeans have never referred to themselves as ancient Neanderthals nor laid claim to Africa as the “ancient homeland”, other than the former colonialists, before conditions drove them into exile.
Here is my first article I wrote on Elhaik’s work, New Genome Study Destroys Zionist Claims to Palestine, published in the Press TV Viewpoints commentary section in the heydays when VT writers were constantly in the top five read articles each week.
In the past six years, new Neolithic remains discoveries in Israel and the advances in genetic sequencing have combined to support Elhaik’s 2013 work, that Ashkenazi Israelis tried to pull off what he aptly described as “shooting the arrow and then drawing a bullseye around it.”
His work made a deep impression on Gordon and me, how this one man with his scientific integrity stood up to the fake Hollywood Ashkenazic Zionist claim to the ancient land. A year after that, five years ago, VT began writing about fake news, how it was being done on an industrial scale, not just a few bad apples.
We were never attacked over our claims, but were ignored. And then magically, about two years ago, the term “fake news” began being widely used.

  • Elhaik describes below that the Yemenis have the closest blood links to the ancient Israelis, while the Saudis, with support from Israel, have actually been doing a mini-genocide on these closest relatives of the Ancients.
    Do take a look at Elhaik’s new Primeval DNA test, which goes way beyond letting us know we are all descended from early Africans. Most of us are more interested in where our ancestors were a few thousand to 10K years ago, and his new project can compare your DNA to the pool of ancient remains that have had their DNA sequenced Jim W. Dean ]
The Vision of the Valley of the Dry Bones, by Gustave Dore’ The hand of the LORD was on me, and he brought me out by the Spirit of the LORD and set me in the middle of a valley; it was full of bones. He led me back and forth among them, and I saw a great many bones on the floor of the valley, bones that were very dry
.… And as I was prophesying, there was a noise, a rattling sound, and the bones came together, bone to bone.
I looked, and tendons and flesh appeared on them and skin covered them, but there was no breath in them… Then he said to me: “Son of man, these bones are the people of Israel.” ~ Ezekiel 37
Who is really a descendant of ancient Israel is now coming into focus, thanks to the huge breakthroughs in genetic sequencing
– First published … May 11, 2019
Dr. Eran Elhaik is a population, medical, and evolutionary geneticist at the University of Sheffield, UK. Reprinted on VT by permission of author.
The Vision of the Valley of Dry Bones prophecy is one of the most powerful prophecies of the prophet Ezekiel. In this vision, Ezekiel finds himself in a valley full of dry human bones of Israelite origins. He is asked to revive them, bring them hope, and lead them to the land of Israel.
For the past decades, Paleogenomics, the field dealing with ancient genomes, has been fulfilling Ezekiel’s vision by extracting DNA from dry bones and telling their stories with increasing accuracy.
As Ezekiel envisioned, only dry (and cold) bones can tell stories. Humidity and heat accelerate the degradation of the DNA beyond repair. At times, even the samples we can use are of poor quality, leading to an inability to put together all the pieces of the DNA and thus incomplete stories from the bones as if told by stuttering tongueless skeletons. These are only some of the challenges we face in our efforts to reconstruct the past.
Ezekiel’s prophecies were written in the 6th century after several exiles of the Judeans to Babylon (601-582 BC). The importance of this vision to the debate on the continuity of the Jewish people became apparent very quickly. Already in the Talmud, two interpretations were offered. The first considered it a complete allegory.
The second considered it a reality where the Babylonian exiles returned to Israel and continued the Judaean bloodline. Zionism, a secular movement that recruited the Bible to serve its needs whenever necessary, considered the State of Israel the ultimate fulfillment of Ezekiel prophecies and called to the ingathering of the exiles.
The question of whether Ezekiel’s vision has been correctly interpreted is not anachronistic and has offshoots in history, archeology, linguistics, and genetics – the battlefields of the primordialists and constructivists.
Did contemporary Jews descend from the ancient Israelites, as the primordialists claim? Or did they descend from people who converted to Judaism and only later on adopted nationalist ideas as the constructivist camp argues?
Of course, one look at Ethiopian, Yemenite, Ashkenazic, and Russian Jews can lend credence to the constructivist view without digging up a single bone. However, the primordialist camp has ready-made answers to that question. It criticized the weak diasporas Jews who succumbed to assimilation and embraced the Jews who remained as authentic Israelites.
It has always been clear that the only way to decide which Jewish communities represent the ancient Israelites most accurately, we should go back to the source – Israel. Therefore, in the late 19th century a search for the jüdische Typus, the “Jewish type” was launched. Anthropologists explored Palestine, studied the native inhabitants, and compare their anthropological measures to Jews.
The results of these studies were incredibly disappointing, at least to the Ashkenazic Jews who carried out these studies and craved to see the jüdische Typus reflected in the mirror. As it turned out, Yemenite Jews held the greatest anthropological resemblance to the wandering Bedouins, the poster boys of the Patriarchs.
Ashkenazic Jews, by contrast, resembled the Caucasian type more than anything else (Efron 1994). This was not what Zionist leaders wanted to hear amid the formation of their nationalistic movement that called Jews to return to their homeland, fight and, maybe, die for it. The research question had to be rephrased.
Abandoning any desire to see a jüdische Typus specimen ever again, the new research paradigm focused on studying features common to all contemporary Jews and deriving the characteristics of the jüdische Typus from them (Elhaik 2016). Unfortunately, no biomarker for Jewishness was ever found in a way that excluded Jews from non-Jews.
Yet the question remained: which of all the Jews who have nothing in common except religion, best represent the Ancient Israelites.
The answer among the Ashkenazic Jewish researchers was almost unanimous – let us mould the jüdische Typus in our own image.
To support these claims, geneticists began producing a large body of literature aimed to support and prove two things:
1) their genetic superiority and
2) their genetic ties to Israel, by showing their resemblance to Levantine populations (Falk 2017), whose own claims to the land were later dismissed on account of being “work migrants.” Kirsh (2003) demonstrated how human geneticists and physicians have consistently manipulated their results and emphasized the sociological and historical aspects of their research using their work as a vehicle for establishing a national identity and confirming the Zionist narrative.
The mammoth in the room was the lack of any genetic evidence from the ancient Israelites that would allow testing the similarity of their DNA to that of modern-day Jews. Since no one imagined that mammoths would ever come to life, they avoided the problem completely.
It was much easier to pretend that modern-day Jews and, Ashkenazic Jews, in particular, are living replicas of the ancient Israelites who not only were all related to one another but also resisted the gene flow from non-Jews all this time. One such enthusiastic advocate is Harry Ostrer (2012), who incidentally tipped his hand by explaining that,
“The stakes in genetic analysis are high. It is more than an issue of who belongs in the family and can partake in Jewish life and Israeli citizenship. It touches on the heart of Zionist claims for a Jewish homeland in Israel. One can imagine future disputes about exactly how large the shared Middle Eastern ancestry of Jewish groups has to be to justify Zionist claims.”
It seems that Ostrer, a resident of a former Native Indian land now known as New York, is so passionate to gain rights to more lands that he completely forgot that his recent 2010 study (Atzmon et al. 2010) ascribed only 50% of Middle Eastern ancestry to Jews compared to 56-59% of non-Jews.
Ostrer’s proposal, thereby, grants non-Jews the largest proportion of the land although they represent only 25% of the general population. One has to assume that those 50% Middle Eastern ancestry of Jews must have experienced a mitosis between the two publications to avoid considering Dr. Ostrer suggestions as discriminatory toward the Jewish people.
Despite of the imagined link between modern-day Jews and the ancient Israelites, the claims of the primordialist camp became well accepted in the direct-to-consumer industry.
The myth of the “Cohen gene” (Skorecki et al. 1997) or “Four mitochondrial mothers” (Behar et al. 2004) produced by the members of this camp became the bedrock of the Genetic Judaism era, where one needs only to order a genetic test from the right company to receive a Jewishness certificate.
Four mothers? We counted over 20 in Ashkenazic Jews alone. Figure 4 from (Das et al. 2016) Paleogenomics changed all that. Thanks to advances in the field, it became possible to extract DNA from ancient people and identify their mictochondrial haplogroups and even autosomal DNA.
This remarkable progress allowed the unthinkable: A semi-revival of the ancient Israeltes from their dry bones and the recovery of their stories. The DNA extracted from those bones can tell us who these people were, what they looked like, what they ate, and what diseases they carried (Nielsen et al. 2017; Prohaska et al. 2019).
We can trace their migration routes to gain a deeper understanding of where we all came from. Yes, they can also tell us how similar those ancient Israelites were to modern-day people, and if modern-day Jews are not the lineal descendants of the ancient Israelites, we can find out who is.
To answer some of these questions, I launched the Primeval DNA test.

The test allows anyone to upload their autosomal DNA file obtained from any genetic company and compare themselves to ancient people from an initial set of seven populations: Ice Age Europeans, Stone Age Europeans, Medieval Vikings, Egyptian mummies, Roman Britons, Chumash Paleo-Indians, and Ancient Israelites.
The dry bones from the Rakefet Cave (From Wikimedia) The ancient Israelites were obtained from three regions Motza Tachtit at the territory of the tribe of Benjamin, Peqi’in (Naphtali), and Rakefet Cave (Manasseh), near the valley of the Rakefet river.
The results can be discussed in our FB group. I also launched the Ancient DNA Hub as a source of knowledge on ancient cultures whose DNA has have been sequenced.
The Primeval DNA test is the most potent genetic tool publicly available to test claims of ancient origins. It allows anyone to journey to their deep past, and explore for the first time their genetic similarity with ancient people. The bones still cannot speak, but in their own way, they have a lot to teach us and allow us to reevaluate our core beliefs.
The answer to the question who is closer to the ancient Israelites rests in the DNA extracted from some 50 bones of ancient Israelites and Judaeans with many more to come. Are modern-Jews mostly Middle Easterns (or ancient Israelites) like Ostrer claims? Hardly.
I ran the test on 80 Jews from various communities. Upon examining the results, I could not help noticing the irony considering how the progress in population genetics validated the findings of the 19th-century anthropologists who combed the Levant in an honest search for the jüdische Typus before the repercussions of their findings became clear and their results were deplored on every stage.
The most similar Jews to the ancient Israelites who left their dry bones in the Rakefet Valley in Israel were Yemenite Jews, but that genetic similarity was less than 10%, on average, in agreement with our previous analyses ascribing less than 5% ancient Levantine ancestry to Ashkenazic Jews (Das et al. 2017) and in support of their potential relatedness to the Ashina tribe.
Yet, these averages mask the high heterogeneity among all Jewish communities. Some people may share the highest similarity with Gal (named after Wonder Woman actress Gal Gadot), a young Neolithic women – only 6200 years old, and other people may find that they are close to Abraham, a Turkish man (E1b1) who led a group of Anatolians to what he must too have felt was the promised land.
Example of results from the Ancient Israelites test of the Primeval DNA test. Due to the many population replacements that the area experienced, we can see a diverse range of mitochondrial haplogroups that vary over time. Among the most common lineages are J2, K1a, and T. An analysis of Judaeans from the first century AD confirmed the prevalence of the T haplogroup (Matheson et al. 2009), found today in less than 10% of Ashkenazic Jews
Unsurprisingly, not a single skeleton matches the alleged four Ashkenazic Jewish mothers, whose origin is in prehistoric Europe (Costa et al. 2013). As expected, an exact match with one of those mothers was found in Neolithoc Spain (Haak et al. 2015). Interestingly, the Y chromosomal haplotypes of the ancient Israelites are typically E1b1 and T1 haplotypes, commonly found today in Africa with lower frequencies in the Middle East and Europe.
We can expect that future tests covering other regions of the world would be able to explain the remaining portion of the elusive Jewish ancestry. Only time will say if “Genetic Jewishness” will evolve onto “Primeval Jewishness” where people define their Jewishness based on their similarity to ancient Israelites and Jews rather than modern ones. Think about it the next time that your favorite genetic testing company tells you that you have some “Ashkenazic Jewish ancestry” or worse, that you are 100% Jews.
I hope that future tests covering other regions of the world would be able to explain the remaining portion of the elusive Jewish ancestry. Will “Genetic Jewishness” evolve onto “Primeval Jewishness” where people define their Jewishness based on their similarity to ancient Israelites and Jews rather than modern ones. Only time will say.
Dr. Eran Elhaik is a population, medical, and evolutionary geneticist at the University of Sheffield, UK. All the rights to the content of this article are reserved to the author.

Last edited by rahu; 05-15-2019 at 10:59 PM.
Reply With Quote
Unread 05-21-2019, 10:15 PM
rahu rahu is offline
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: 5025 valley crest dr #135 concord ca 94521
Posts: 10,860
Re: The Mossad


Censored: The Secret Israeli War on America (Suppressed 4 part video)

VT Editors -

May 20, 2019 2

A massive spy program by Israel to spy on American citizens, rig elections, assassinations, schmear campaigns, bribery…
Jewish college students reporting to spy handlers…openly organized terror cells, the real al Qaeda…just like we saw on 9/11
Dancing Dancing Dancing Dancing Dancing Dancing
Reply With Quote
Unread 05-28-2019, 11:13 PM
rahu rahu is offline
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: 5025 valley crest dr #135 concord ca 94521
Posts: 10,860
Re: The Mossad


The Secret History of the Mossad

“Not only have Mossad’s secret agents killed more people than the agents of any other state since World War II, but the pace has rapidly increased, with some 800 operations in the past decade…"

…by Jonas E. Alexis and Mark Dankof

Mark Dankof is the former 36th District Chairman of the Republican Party in King County/Seattle. He was an elected delegate to Texas State Republican Conventions in 1994 and 1996 and entered the United States Senate race in Delaware in 2000 as the nominated candidate of the Constitution Party against Democratic candidate Thomas Carper and Republican incumbent William Roth.
JEA: The Mossad has been assassinating perceived enemies since its inception,[1] and they make no apology for their essentially diabolical enterprise.[2] They have assassinated Iranian scientists, and even former president Barack Obama had to ask the Israelis to stop killing people they do not like.[3]
Even the Daily Mail, of all places, reported that Israel, “a country born in bloodshed, has become the leader in assassinations.”[4] Taking its cues from Ronen Bergman’s Rise and Kill First: The Secret History of Israel’s Targeted Assassinations, the Daily Mail continues to say:
“Not only have Mossad’s secret agents killed more people than the agents of any other state since World War II, but the pace has rapidly increased, with some 800 operations in the past decade…
“One operation in 1968 was directly inspired by the film The Manchurian Candidate, with Mossad hiring a Swedish-born psychologist to brainwash a Palestinian prisoner into murdering Yasser Arafat, chairman of the Palestine Liberation Organisation.
“The psychologist picked a suitable prisoner and spent three months hypnotising him with the simple message: ‘Arafat bad. He must be removed’. The prisoner, known only as Fatkhi, was trained to shoot at pictures of Arafat, hidden in a specially prepared room. On December 19, 1968, a Mossad team smuggled Fatkhi across the River Jordan, from where he was supposed to infiltrate Arafat’s headquarters.
“Then they waited. Five hours later, news came. Fatkhi had wasted no time. He had gone straight to a police station and accused Mossad of trying to brainwash him. The operation was an abject failure.”[5]
I have argued elsewhere that the Mossad is a pernicious organization that will do virtually any wicked thing—including propounding deliberate lies and falsifications, assassinating scientists, sabotaging nuclear facilities, corrupting computers with viruses such as Stuxnet, spreading bloodshed in the name of “defense,” making alliances with terrorist organizations such as the MEK, using fake passports and documents to infiltrate countries and assassinate individuals, playing semantics and manipulating public opinion, spying on “friends” such as America, cooperating with dictators, and launching “terrorizing campaigns” at “European experts”[6]—in order to complete the Zionist dream. Some of these covert and wicked activities have been going on for over sixty years.
Jewish writers Dan Raviv and Yossi Melman try very hard not to say that the Mossad acts like terrorists, but there is an actual team from within the Mossad called Kiddon that practiced not only covert operations but the assassination of perceived enemies.[7] Most of the assassinations are approved by the prime minister. A classic example would be the strategic plan to assassinate the late Yasser Arafat.[8]
The central point here is that Jewish assassination didn’t start in the twentieth century. It got its start in the first century. One can historically say that Jewish terrorism began during the Second Temple era with the Hashmonai family. During the Hellenistic period, they “conducted an ongoing campaign of guerilla warfare against Hellenistic rule in Israel,” though terrorism was a small fraction of their campaign.[9]

Their first terrorist act was the assassination of a Hellenistic envoy named Apelles, who was sent to the town of Modi’in to remind the inhabitants of the policy of assimilation advanced by Antiochus IV.
Although this particular band of terrorists did not last long, many such terrorist cells came and went throughout the first century, recruiting for one purpose or another. Members of one band, Bar Giora, “were involved primarily in robbing and pillaging the property of the local aristocracy.”[10]
So the Mossad is just the culmination of Israeli terrorism. Mark Dankof, what is your assessment? Can you talk about Gordon Thomas’ Gideon Spies as well?

MD: Orthodox Lutherans are not known as enthusiastic supporters of the existence of the State of Israel, or of the political and exegetical arguments advanced for its place in the world by one of the most diverse coalitions ever assembled in history. After reading Gordon Thomas’ meticulously researched tome, Gideon’s Spies-The Secret History of the Mossad, they will be even less so inclined.
Thomas, the gifted author of Journey into Madness, Pontiff, and Chaos under Heaven, provides the reader with initial and concluding sections of information that may well serve the uninitiated best by being read prior to chapters 1 through 17 as preparatory information to set the stage and context of the actual narrative itself.
The first of these is the Glossary which precedes the first chapter. Here the novice to the world of intelligence generally and to Israeli intelligence specifically is treated to a list of 107 terms and acronyms which provide an effective briefing and synopsis of the diabolical world of espionage and intelligence wars between Israel and its adversaries into which Thomas subsequently introduces the serious reader.
Among these terms is The Institute–the formal name of Mossad-Institute for Intelligence and Special Operations; originally called Institute for Coordination. Some of the remaining listings in the Glossary are suggestive of what the reader will learn in the chapters to follow.
These include better world–a euphemism for killing an enemy agent; send a person on vacation–to injure him/her-the extent of the injury depends on whether the `vacation’ is to be brief or long; blow-back–fake stories fed to foreign news media; honey trap–sexual entrapment for intelligence purposes; kidon–an operative specializing in assassination; and measles–an assassination that appears to stem from natural causes.

The second section that should be read prior to beginning chapter 1 are the concluding Notes on Sources and Select Bibliography. These concluding sections acquaint the reader with the professional background of Gordon Thomas, the disturbing significance and unquestioned credentials of his sources, and the wealth of previous work and research on intelligence which the author has conducted prior to the initiation of Gideon’s Spies.
In Notes and Sources, Thomas references a conversation with a Mossad katsa which may underscore the reader’s own evolving feelings about the clandestine world of operational intelligence after 337 pages of riveting text:
“I still remember completing a long interview with a former katsa who provided an account of how he had killed. Suddenly he looked around at the comfortable living room with its views of a biblical landscape and sighed deeply and said, ‘This world is not this world.’
“The words have stayed with me. I think that what he meant was that, compared to his former work, beneath ordinary rhythms and appearances of life, a darkness and menace had never left him. I found that with several of the others with whom I spoke. It was a sobering reminder that the world of intelligence is, as Saint Paul glimpsed heaven, all too often indeed ‘seen through a glass, darkly.’”

A palpable, inescapable sense of darkness and menace may well begin to subsequently permeate and engulf the reader of this engaging, fascinating, but terrifying chronicle. Especially sobering are the portions of the narrative which document the role of the United States and its intelligence community in a long-standing supportive alliance with the Mossad through some of the latter’s most hideous operations abroad.
Pages 29 and 30 of chapter 2 document the cementing of this clandestine collaboration in 1954 during an official meeting between then Mossad Director General Isser Harel and Allen Dulles of the American Central Intelligence Agency:
“Another coup came when he [Harel] traveled to Washington in 1954 to meet Allen Dulles, who had just taken over the CIA. Harel presented the veteran spymaster with a dagger bearing the engraved word of the psalmist: ‘the Guardian of Israel neither slumbers or sleeps.’ Dulles replied: ‘You can count on me to stay awake with you.’
“These words created a partnership between Mossad and the CIA. Dulles arranged for Mossad to have state-of-the-art equipment: listening and tracking devices, remote-operated cameras, and a range of gadgets that Harel admitted he never knew existed. The two men also formed the first intelligence ‘back-channel’ between their two services, through which they could communicate by secure phone in the case of any emergency. The channel effectively bypassed the normal diplomatic route, to the chagrin of both the State Department and the Israeli foreign ministry.”
As Thomas proceeds to demonstrate, this collaboration would continue to the present, despite the paradoxical exposure in recent years of Israeli intelligence operations within the borders of its most significant ally that have clearly been to the detriment of the national security interests of the latter.
And it would survive the revelations about the activities of the Mossad abroad which raise the most compelling questions of American complicity or acquiescence in Israeli sponsored acts of murder, kidnapping, torture, electronic surveillance, theft, and military occupation which clearly violate known tenets of international law, along with a developed body of orthodox Christian and Jewish moral axioms which would seem to be contraindicated by the motives and methods of the participants in the secret wars and counterinsurgencies of nation-states.
Thus, from genesis to conclusion, Thomas’ weaves a multitude of the most questionable and sinister plots and operations into the unfolding 17 chapter portrait of the mind and actions of the masters of Mossad and the Israeli intelligence mosaic. All are compelling. Three (3) in particular serve to provide the reader with a core mass of data with which to re-assess the wisdom and morality of the actions of both Israel and the United States in the international arena since 1948.
These include first, the “cold approach” in June-August of 1997 of a Mossad katsa to Henri Paul, the substance abusing director of security of the Ritz Hotel and the ill-fated driver on August 31, 1997 of the car carrying Princess Diana and boyfriend Dodi Al-Fayed, along with Paul, to their deaths on the westbound roadway of the underpass beneath the place de l’Alma in Paris.
At the time of the crash, according to Thomas, Mossad’s desire to recruit Paul as an active agent/source was rooted in its knowledge of Paul’s expensive vices, susceptibility to bribery, and the Israelis’ desire for a highly placed source at the hotel widely known as a “meeting place for Middle Eastern arms brokers and their European contacts.”
Thomas raises the unanswerable question as to whether or not the Mossad pressure on Paul and the latter’s disintegrating mental and emotional state played a role in the tragedy and accompanying fatalities. The author outlines the concern that:
“Some of Maurice’s [Mossad katsa in Paris] colleagues have increasingly felt that the attempt to entrap Henri Paul was additional proof that Mossad has lurched a little further out of control, carrying out reckless international operations without taking into account the potential long-term consequences for itself, for Israel, for peace in the Middle East, and, ultimately, for the relationship with the Jewish state’s oldest and closest ally, the United States of America. Several officers claimed that since Benyamin Netanyahu became prime minister in 1996, matters have worsened.”
Secondly, Thomas chronicles the most daring pre-Jonathan Pollard Mossad operation launched against the United States after the inception of the Jewish state in 1948–the purloining of 100 pounds of fissionable material from an Apollo, Pennsylvania based nuclear material processing company, for employment at Dimona in the Negev Desert. The silver-domed, thinly disguised nuclear plant had been publicly proclaimed by Ben-Gurion as a “pumping station” to turn the desert into an “agricultural paradise by desalinating a billion cubic gallons of seawater annually.”
In reality, as was well known within both Israel and the United States, the Dimona operation was from the beginning an attempt at the acquisition of nuclear weaponry for the Jewish state. This recognition reached into the White House itself, where Thomas informs the reader that in February of 1961, President John Kennedy wrote to Ben-Gurion suggesting that Dimona should be regularly inspected by the International Atomic Energy Agency.
What followed would be a primer for Mossad penetration of the United States and the compromise of the latter’s national security interests and secrets. Ben-Gurion would recruit Abraham Feinberg, a Zionist supporter of Israel’s nuclear aspirations and not coincidentally, the leading Jewish fund-raiser for the Democratic Party in America and an important financial backer of the Dimona project. As Thomas puts it:
“Feinberg’s method was straightforward political pressure–the kind that had already infuriated Kennedy when he was running for office. Then, Feinberg had bluntly told him: ‘We are willing to pay your bills if you will let us have control of your Middle East policy.’ Kennedy had promised to ‘give Israel every possible break.’
“Feinberg had agreed to provide an initial campaign contribution of five hundred thousand dollars—‘with more to come.’ Now he used the same direct approach: if President Kennedy continued to insist on an inspection of Dimona, he should ‘not count on Jewish financial support in the next political election.’ . . .
“The president did at the last minute grant two concessions. In return for access to Dimona, the United States would sell Israel Hawk surface-to-air missiles, then the most advanced defensive weapon in the world. And the inspection need not be carried out by the International Atomic Energy Agency, but by an American-only team–that would have to schedule its visit weeks in advance.”
Thirdly, Thomas underscores in chapter 10 of Gideon’s Spies, the incredible story of the Mossad recruitment and subsequent alleged physical elimination of Robert Maxwell, the British media magnate of the Mirror Newspaper Group.
As the sordid tale emerges, Maxwell is shown to have purchased the Newspaper Group with money lent to him by Mossad. After the acquisition of the papers, Maxwell began a sophisticated embezzlement scheme aimed at the pension fund of his own employees, to finance Mossad operations throughout the European theater.
Thomas also outlines the role of Maxwell in the world-wide promotion of Promis, a computer program designed to increase the world-wide computer surveillance capabilities of police and intelligence agencies worldwide. The relationship of the Institute to one of its leading media moguls in the world would sour, however, with the developing financial problems of the Maxwell empire, his envelopment in signs of increasing mental and emotional instability, and the derivative concerns of Mossad that Maxwell had evolved from asset to a potentially dangerous liability and embarrassment.
On October 29, 1991, Maxwell received orders from Israeli intelligence in Madrid to come to Spain, fly to Gibraltar, and board his yacht, the Lady Ghislaine, for a subsequent sailing to the Canary Islands. Thomas tells the reader what happened next:
“In what it claimed was a ‘world exclusive,’ headlined ‘How and Why Robert Maxwell Was Murdered,’ Britain’s Business Age magazine subsequently claimed that a two-man hit team crossed in a dinghy during the night from a motor yacht that had shadowed the Lady Ghislaine.
“Boarding the yacht, they found Maxwell on the afterdeck. The men overpowered him before he could call for help. Then, ‘one assassin injected a bubble of air into Maxwell’s neck via his jugular vein. It took just a few moments for Maxwell to die.’ . . . More certain, on the night of November 4-5, Mossad’s problems with Maxwell were laid to rest in the cold swell of the Atlantic. . .
“On November 10, 1991, Maxwell’s funeral took place on the Mount of Olives in Jerusalem, the resting place for the nation’s most revered heroes. It had all the trappings of a state occasion, attended by the country’s government and opposition leaders. No fewer than six serving and former heads of the Israeli intelligence community listened as Prime Minister Shamir eulogized: ‘He has done more for Israel than can today be said.’”
Thomas’s book has only one glaring weakness-its obvious omission of any investigation or reference to the rumors of strong intelligence connections between the Mossad and some of American Protestant Evangelicalism’s leading lights, who have served to evangelize their faithful in the gospel of incessant support for the modern State of Israel.
Has Mossad influenced or purchased some of America’s leading television evangelists, authors, and pastors? Does American Evangelicalism have its own versions of an owned-and-handled Robert Maxwell, putting a well-financed and desired pro-Israel political spin into the print pages and electronic media outlets of the mainstream political and religious right at the behest of a foreign intelligence agency?
Thomas would have provided a public service to the Christian public specifically and the American people generally had he explored this long suspected link, complete with names and documented money and paper trails. A sequel is definitely in order. Reading Gideon’s Spies is an enlightening and fascinating experience.
For the post-World War II American conservative movement, and for the religious right long influenced by the teachings of the school of prophetic interpretation known as dispensational premillennialism, the work serves as a warning–of the dangers of an uncritical support of the American and Israeli political, military, and intelligence establishment’s agenda worldwide, and the dangers of equating support for the modern State of Israel and its “this-world” methodology with the Kingdom of God and the latter’s eternality, transcendence, holiness, and ethics.

  • [1] For historical studies on this issue, see for example Gordon Thomas, Gideon’s Spies: The Secret History of the Mossad (New York: St.
Reply With Quote
Unread 06-01-2019, 09:11 PM
rahu rahu is offline
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: 5025 valley crest dr #135 concord ca 94521
Posts: 10,860
Re: The Mossad

Netanyahu's genocidal approach to the palestiians was even too barbaric for Israel's elite special forces,unit 8200 to condone.

new york times 9/13/14

43 veterans of the Israeli, elite, clandestine unit 8200 have decaled they will no longer "take part in the states action against Palestinians" because of "our moral duty to act".
these veterans of unit 8600 complained Israel made" no distinction between Palestinians who are and are not involved in violence". information was collected and "harms innocent people". intelligence "is used for political persecution." included where 27 pilots who refused to participate[ate in targeted assassination.
"after our service we started seeing a more complex picture od a non-democratic,oppressive regime that controls the lives of millions of people

THE HAGUE/JERUSALEM (Reuters) - The possibility of a war crimes investigation into the conduct of Israeli forces in Gaza, until recently unthinkable, has grown after the Palestinians said this week they wanted to become a party to the International Criminal Court.

The legal groundwork for such a move was laid in Nov 2012 when the 193-member U.N. General Assembly overwhelmingly approved the de facto recognition of the sovereign state of Palestine by upgrading the Palestinian Authority's observer status to "non-member state" from "entity

Israeli officials said the hostilities were justified self defense against militant attacks and that all efforts have been made to avoid civilian deaths. Roughly 47 percent of those killed in Gaza were combatants, Israel said


Reply With Quote
Unread 06-10-2019, 08:00 PM
rahu rahu is offline
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: 5025 valley crest dr #135 concord ca 94521
Posts: 10,860
Re: The Mossad


Israeli Rabbis Openly Embrace Racism – Defend Hitler

Harold Saive -

June 6, 2019 7

“Let’s just start with whether Hitler was right or not,” … “He was the most correct person there ever was, and was correct in every word…” – Rabbi Eliezer Kashtiel

“Yes, we’re racists. We believe in racism”

Embracing racism, rabbis at pre-army yeshiva laud Hitler, urge enslaving Arabs

Recordings show instructors at settlement academy openly promoting Jewish supremacy; principal says Arabs want to live under Israeli occupation due to their genetic inferiority.
Two rabbis at a pre-military religious academy in a West Bank settlement were recorded making derogatory and racist comments about Arabs, defending Adolf Hitler’s worldview, and openly promoting Jewish supremacy.
In a series of undated recordings published by Channel 13 news on Monday, Rabbi Eliezer Kashtiel, the head of the Bnei David academy in Eli, can be heard calling for the enslavement of the “stupid and violent” non-Jews due to their genetic inferiority.
“The gentiles will want to be our slaves. Being a slave to a Jew is the best. They’re glad to be slaves, they want to be slaves,” he told a class in one of the video clips. “Instead of just walking the streets and being stupid and violent and harming each other, once they’re slaves, their lives can begin to take shape.”
Adam Green Documentary “God’s Chosen People”
Knuckle-dragging racism flourishing in the Israeli Talmud-thumping Rabbi Brotherhood

“All around us, we are surrounded by peoples with genetic problems. Ask a simple Arab ‘where do you want to be?’ He wants to be under the occupation. Why? Because they have genetic problems, they don’t know how to run a country, they don’t know how to do anything. Look at them.”
In the lecture, Kashtiel goes on to embrace racism against non-Jews.
“Yes, we’re racists. We believe in racism… There are races in the world and peoples have genetic traits, and that requires us to try to help them,” he said. “The Jews are a more successful race.”
In another clip from the Bnei David Yeshiva published by Channel 13, Rabbi Giora Redler can be heard praising Hilter’s ideology during a lesson about the Holocaust.
“Let’s just start with whether Hitler was right or not,” he told students. “He was the most correct person there ever was, and was correct in every word he said… he was just on the wrong side.”

  • “The real Holocaust was not when they murdered the Jews, that’s not it. All these excuses — that it was ideological or systematic — are nonsense,” he said. “Humanism, and the secular culture of ‘We believe in man,’ that’s the Holocaust.”
    The comments drew wide condemnation from opposition lawmakers who called for pulling all state funding to the Eli-based academy over Kashtiel’s and Redler’s remarks

    'Yes, we're racists. We believe in racism'
    Embracing racism, rabbis at pre-army yeshiva laud Hitler, urge enslaving Arabs

    Recordings show instructors at settlement academy openly promoting Jewish supremacy; principal says Arabs want to live under Israeli occupation due to their genetic inferiority

    Tamar Pileggi is a breaking news editor at The Times of Israel.

    Rabbi Eliezer Kashtiel, the head of the pre-military academy in the West Bank settlement in Eli. (screen capture: Channel 13)

    Two rabbis at a pre-military religious academy in a West Bank settlement were recorded making derogatory and racist comments about Arabs, defending Adolf Hitler’s worldview, and openly promoting Jewish supremacy.
    In a series of undated recordings published by Channel 13 news on Monday, Rabbi Eliezer Kashtiel, the head of the Bnei David academy in Eli, can be heard calling for the enslavement of the “stupid and violent” non-Jews due to their genetic inferiority.

    “The gentiles will want to be our slaves. Being a slave to a Jew is the best. They’re glad to be slaves, they want to be slaves,” he told a class in one of the video clips. “Instead of just walking the streets and being stupid and violent and harming each other, once they’re slaves, their lives can begin to take shape.” Get The Times of Israel's Daily Edition by email and never miss our top stories Free Sign Up
    “All around us, we are surrounded by peoples with genetic problems. Ask a simple Arab ‘where do you want to be?’ He wants to be under the occupation. Why? Because they have genetic problems, they don’t know how to run a country, they don’t know how to do anything. Look at them.”

    In the lecture, Kashtiel goes on to embrace racism against non-Jews.
    “Yes, we’re racists. We believe in racism… There are races in the world and peoples have genetic traits, and that requires us to try to help them,” he said. “The Jews are a more successful race.”
    Rabbi Giora Redler, a teacher at the the pre-military academy in the West Bank settlement in Eli. (screen capture: Channel 13)

    In another clip from the Bnei David Yeshiva published by Channel 13, Rabbi Giora Redler can be heard praising Hilter’s ideology during a lesson about the Holocaust.
    “Let’s just start with whether Hitler was right or not,” he told students. “He was the most correct person there ever was, and was correct in every word he said… he was just on the wrong side.”
    Redler goes on to say that pluralism is the “real” genocide being perpetrated against the Jewish people, not Nazi Germany’s Final Solution.
    “The real Holocaust was not when they murdered the Jews, that’s not it. All these excuses — that it was ideological or systematic — are nonsense,” he said. “Humanism, and the secular culture of ‘We believe in man,’ that’s the Holocaust.”
    The comments drew wide condemnation from opposition lawmakers who called for pulling all state funding to the Eli-based academy over Kashtiel’s and Redler’s remarks.
    Students at the Bnei David pre-army academy learn in the study hall. (Screen capture/YouTube)

    “This is not Judaism, and these are not our values,” Blue and White MK Yair Lapid said in a statement. “People who talk this way are not worthy of calling themselves rabbis… the state needs to stop funding this program until the racist rabbis are removed.”

    Meretz chairwoman Tamar Zandberg sent a letter to the Education Ministry demanding that all state funding be severed in light of “the chauvinism, homophobia and hate being spewed from that academy.”
    After the footage was aired on Monday, Kashtiel and Redler, in a statement to Channel 13, acknowledged making the remarks but claimed the comments were taken out of context.
    Kashtiel said he was “pained” that his “lesson on human rights” was misinterpreted, telling the network he meant the precise opposite, and was calling for “social responsibility and caring for the weak.” He said his references to slavery and racism were a “modernist-socialist interpretation” of those concepts.
    Read: Officers and gentlemen? Religious Zionist flagship academy comes under scrutiny
    In his lesson, Redler said he was simply trying to “explain Hitler’s morbid logic,” and accused the media of a “cynical smear” against him days before Holocaust Remembrance Day.
    Rabbis teaching at the Eli academy — a darling of the national religious camp for funneling of thousands of religious officers into senior combat positions in the IDF — have a history of making controversial and illiberal remarks.
    Rabbi Yigal Levinstein speaking at the ‘Zion and Jerusalem’ convention in July 2016. (Screen capture: YouTube)

    In 2016, the co-founder of the Bnei David academy, Yigal Levinstein, was recorded in class calling gay people “sick and perverted. In another lecture that year, Levinstein claimed that drafting women to the IDF was making them “crazy” and stripped them of their Jewishness.
    Bnei David’s other co-founder, Rabbi Eli Sadan, preaches against educating women, claiming that independent thinking “neuters their most important capability… to build the home.”
    Last year, footage surfaced of another Bnei David teacher, Rabbi Yosef Kelner, lecturing students on women being “weak-minded” and possessing a reduced capacity for spirituality.
    In 2017, then-defense minister Avigdor Liberman vowed to defund the Eli academy, but the move was blocked by the attorney general for legal reasons. Instead, Liberman announced that he would restrict the number of students as a punitive measure for the “constant sexism” at the Eli academy.

    Jacob Magid contributed to this report.

Last edited by rahu; 06-10-2019 at 08:04 PM.
Reply With Quote
Unread 06-13-2019, 12:39 AM
rahu rahu is offline
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: 5025 valley crest dr #135 concord ca 94521
Posts: 10,860
Re: The Mossad


EU blasted for ever closer co-operation with terror regime in Israel

"Public funds contributed by European tax payers are channeled to a country that not only disregards human rights but also uses most advanced knowledge and technology for the very violation of human rights.... This is not compatible with the values Europe upholds."
Stuart Littlewood -

June 12, 2019 8

One hundred and fifty-five European Researchers and academics have delivered a stinging rebuke to Federica Mogherini, High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs & Security Policy and Vice-President of the European Commission, and Carlos Moedas, European Commissioner for Science, Research & Innovation.
In a beautifully crafted letter they express the outrage felt throughout the world, and especially in European countries including the UK, at the EU’s policy of rewarding the war crimes and crimes against humanity committed by Israel. Each new act of unspeakable brutality, each new onslaught of disproportionate force against civilians brings fresh privileges, fresh co-operation, fresh embraces from an enthusiastic EU élite.
Perhaps the most shameful thing about Europe’s relations with Israel is the EU-Israel Association Agreement which came into force in 2000. This is about special trading and other privileges and its purpose is to promote (1) peace and security, (2) shared prosperity through, for example, the creation of a free trade zone, and (3) cross-cultural rapprochement. It governs not only EU-Israel relations but Israel’s relations with the EU’s other Mediterranean partners, including the Palestinian National Authority.
To enjoy the Association’s privileges Israel undertook to show “respect for human rights and democratic principles” as set out as a general condition in Article 2, which says:
“Relations between the Parties, as well as all the provisions of the Agreement itself, shall be based on respect for human rights and democratic principles, which guides their internal and international policy and constitutes an essential element of this Agreement.”
“Essential” being the operative word.
Respecting human rights and democratic principles is not optional. Article 2 allows steps to be taken to enforce the contractual obligations regarding human rights and to dissuade partners from pursuing policies and practices that disrespect those rights. The Agreement also requires respect for self-determination of peoples and fundamental freedoms for all.
Given Israel’s contempt for such principles the EU, had it been an honourable group, would have enforced Article 2 and not let matters slide. They would have suspended Israel’s membership until the regime fully complied. Israel relies heavily on exports to Europe so the EU could by now have forced an end to the brutal occupation of the Holy Land instead of always rewarding it.
The signatories to the letter to Mogherini and Moedas aptly quote the warning by Israel’s own human rights group B’Tselem:
“If the international community does not come to its senses and force Israel to abide by the rules that are binding to every state in the world, it will pull the rug out from under the global effort to protect human rights in the post-WW2 era.”
Here is that excellent letter:
To Ms. Federica Mogherini – High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy
To Mr Carlos Moedas – European Commission, DG for Research and Innovation
Brussels, June 4, 2019
Re: Letter from European researchers and academics concerning Israel’s participation in Horizon Europe
Dear Ms. Federica Mogherini, Dear Mr. Moedas,
We researchers and academics from Europe are writing to you in order to express our deep concern about the participation of Israel and its military companies in EU Research Programs. While we write, new Israeli raids flare up and the smoldering remnant of Gaza protesters of the Great March of Return, already forgotten and forsaken.
More than 270 unarmed civilians were killed during the March of return, including women, children and persons with disabilities and thousands more were injured [28.939, of whom 7.247 by live fire]. They were only demanding their rights enshrined in international law: end of the illegal blockade and for the right of return to their ancestral homes from which they were expelled.
A report of the United Nation’s Independent Commission of Inquiry published earlier this year concluded that the Israeli army might have committed war crimes and crimes against humanity by indiscriminately killing health workers, journalists and unarmed protesters who did not pose any imminent threats to the soldiers.
Relentless violence rages again after 11 years of inhumane siege and three military assaults that shattered the fabric of normal life. Gaza is declared to be uninhabitable by 2020 according to a report by the UN, but this “environmentally defined” deadline reflects only the intentionality of an imposed series of emergencies, followed each time by a further decrease in health, energy, food independence and commerce after each episode of armed aggression since 2007.
The hermetic siege combined with the systematic large scale military destruction is slowly strangling nearly the two million inhabitants of Gaza. None of the basic civilian infrastructure such as hospitals and power plants, was ever sufficiently rebuilt after each of the three military assaults due to severe restrictions by the blockade. Electricity is available only a few hours a day, 98% of water is not drinkable, and many hospitals periodically stop functioning due to lack of medication, spare parts of machinery, electricity and fuel.
Permission for patients to leave in order to receive life-saving treatment elsewhere has been continually declining in time. Tools for education, number of teachers, and rebuilding of schools are severely impaired. The inhabitants of Gaza have been consistently denied basic human rights and human dignity.
The disproportionate use of force on the civilians amounting to war crimes has also been systematic throughout all, long and short term, military operations, including the almost daily assaults to fishermen and agricultural workers.
These facts have been meticulously documented in authoritative reports by the UN and human rights organizations and widely condemned by the international community. Yet Israel’s policies of aggression and repression have continued.
This ongoing impunity is allowing Gaza, the world’s largest open air prison, to be used as a military testfield. In each offensive Israel deployed, tested and perfected new high-tech military weapons and surveillance systems. These new cutting edge high-tech products are exhibited and sold as “battle-tested”, an exclusive label Israeli home land security industry boasts. Israel became the world’s top arms exporter per capita.
This grave violation of human rights is thus highly profitable for Israel’s war industry disclosing another side of the claim of “only self-defense” and the interests beyond the lack of measure in the aggressions on Palestinians of Gaza.
Nonethelss, in spite of continual and serious breaches of international law and violation of human rights, and regardless of the commitment for upholding human rights of European countries, Israel enjoys an exceptionally privileged status in dealing with Europe also through the Association Agreement and has been receiving grants from the European Commission in the area of research and innovation (FP7 and its successor Horizon 2020).
Funds are granted even to Israeli arms producers such as Elbit Systems and Israel Aerospace Industries Ltd. (IAI), the producers of lethal drones that were used in the Gaza military assaults against civilians, together with numerous academic institutions that have close ties with Israeli military industry.
We appeal to the European Union to impose a comprehensive military embargo on Israel, as long as Israel continues to blatantly violate human rights. We are deeply disturbed that public funds contributed by European tax payers are channeled to a country that not only disregards human rights but also uses most advanced knowledge and technology for the very violation of human rights.
We believe that knowledge and innovation should serve progress in humanity and society, not to develop dual use or military research of a country that has a record history of grave human rights violations. This is not compatible with the values Europe upholds.
In 2017 more than 150 European trade unions, political parties, human rights organizations and faith groups from over 16 European countries issued a call urging the EU to uphold its legal responsibilities and exclude Israeli military companies from EU Framework Programs.
We support Amnesty International call for a military embargo on Israel issued last year following the attacks on the unarmed protesters of the Great March of Return using maiming bullets and brutal means by the Israeli army, unnecessary in that context.
Youth of Gaza appealed to you to stop funding Israeli manufacturers of weapons and surveillance system that guard their open-air prison, maimed them and destroyed their future.
In support of their outcry we call upon European Union and European Commission to suspend the Association Agreement with Israel and exclude Israel as an eligible partner for Horizon Europe (successor of Horizon 2020), as long as it refuses to comply with the rules of international law. We also share the concern of B’Tselem, Israeli human rights organization, which stated,
“If the international community does not come to its senses and force Israel to abide by the rules that are binding to every state in the world, it will pull the rug out from under the global effort to protect human rights in the post-WWII era.”
1. Dr. Nozomi Takahashi, Center for Inflammation Research, VIB-Ghent University, Belgium
2. Prof. Marc Van Ranst, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Belgium
3. Dr. Leander Meuris, Medical Biotechnology, VIB-Ghent University, Belgium
4. Prof. Tarek Meguid,
5. Prof. Em. John Dugard, Universities of Leiden and the Witwatersrand (UN Special Rapporteur onthe human rights situation in the Occupied Palestinian Territory 2001-2008)
6. Prof. Em. Herman De Ley, Ghent University, Belgium
7. Dr. Andrea Balduzzi, Università di Genova, Italy
8. Prof.Giuliano Donzellini, University of Genua, Italy
9. Prof.Sergio Morra, University of Genua, Italy
10. Prof. Paolo Bartolini, University of Genua, Italy
11. Dr.Angela Waldegg, Austria
12. Prof. Salvatore Palidda,University of Genua, Italy
13. Andrea Sbarbaro,office worker (psychologist),University of Genua, Italy
14. Prof.Marcello Maneri, University of Milano-Bicocca, Italy
15. Dr.Syksy Räsäne, University of Helsinki, Finland
16. PhD. Prof. Haseeb Shehadeh, University of Helsinki, Finland
17. Paola Manduca, Former Associate Professor Genetics,University of Genoa, Italy
18. Prof. Em.Giorgio Forti, Unuversità degli Studi di Milkano, Italy
19. Adjunct Professor Pertti Multanen, University of Tampere, Finland
20. Dr. Angela Flynn, University College Cork, Ireland
21. Docente ordinario Giuseppe Mosconi, Università di Padova, Italy
22. Prof.Anna Boato, Uniiversità di Genova, Italy
23. Dr. Ronit Lentin, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland,
24. Mathias Urban, Desmond Chair of Early Childhood Education, Dublin City University, Ireland
25. Prof. Sancia Gaetani, Già Istituto Nazionale Nutrizione, Italy
26. James Roche, Lecturer,Technoligical University Dublin, Ireland
27. Prof. Angelo Baracca,University of Florence, Italy
28. Prof.Giorgio M. Giallocosta, University of Genoa, Italy
29. Prof PhD Alessandro Bianchi, Department Informatics – Univ. Bari, Italy
30. Em. Prof Elisabetta Donini, University of Turin, Italy
31. Prof. Luca Queirolo Palmas,University of Genoa, Italy
32. Rosella Franconi, Senior scientist, Italy
33. Pediatric surgeon Bruno Cigliano, University “Federico II” Naples-Italy
34. Prof. Vittorio Agnoletto,University of Milan, Italy
35. Em. Prof.Andrea Frova, Università di Roma “La Sapienza”, Physics Dept, Italy
36. Em. Prof. Mariapiera Marenzana, Ministry of Education, Italy
37. Massimo Di Rosa, Italy
38. Prof. Iain Chambers, University of Naples, “Orientale”, Italy
39. Dr. Paola Rivetti, Dublin City University, Ireland
40. Prof. Lidia Curti, University of Naples, Italy
41. Phd. Kati Juva, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Finland
42. Hessel Christiane, Epouse de l’Ambassadeur de France Stéphane Hessel, France
43. Phd. Bruno Lapauw, Ghent University, Belgium
44. Prof. Matthieu Lenoir, Ghent University, Belgium
45. Prof. Stef Craps, Ghent University, Belgium
46. Prof. Dr. De Baerdemaeker Luc, Ghent University, Belgium
47. Ana Cabal, University of Antwerp, Belgium
48. Dr. Kristina Mercelis, Belgium
49. Arch assistant. Geert Pauwels, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium
50. R. Van Laere, Royal academy for Archaeology of Belgium
51. Prof. Karel Arnaut, KU Leuven – IMMRC, Belgium
52. Prof. Dr.Willie van Peer, University of Munich, Austria
53. Prof. Dr. Em. Frans Daems,University of Antwerp, Belgium
54. Omar Jabary Salamanca, Ghent University, Belgium
55. Prof. Jan Delrue, KU Leuven University, Belgium
56. Em. Prof. Christian Kesteloot, KU Leuven University, Belgium
57. Prof. Em. Aviel Verbruggen, University of Antwerp, Belgium
58. Medical student Serhat Yildirim,Ghent University , Belgium
59. Prof. Emer. Piet Mertens, KU Leuven, Belgium
60. Associate Professor Nadia Fadil, KU Leuven, Belgium
61. Em. Prof. Dr. Patric Jacobs, Ghent University, Geology Deparment, Belgium
62. Honourary Professor Michel Vanhoorne, Ghent University, Belgium
63. Docent Jan Wyns, Belgium
64. Em. Prof. Marc David, Universiteit Antwerpen, Belgium
65. Prof. Pieter Rombouts, Ghent University, Belgium
66. Mireille Gleizes, Belgium
67. Dr. Barbara Van Dyck, University of Sussex, UK
68. Em. Prof. Claude Veraart, University of Louvain (UCL), Belgium
69. Professeur Honoraire Pierre Gillis, Université de Mons, Belgium
70. Researcher Patrick Italiano, University of Liege, Belgium
71. Professeur Ordinaire Honoraire André Gob, Université de Liège, Belgium
72. Researcher Jacques Moriau, ULB, Belgium
73. Philosopher Marc Vandepitte, Technische Scholen Mechelen, Belgium
74. Abdessalam Faraj, Belgium
75. PhD Gillet S. University of Namur, Belgium
76. Em. Prof. Mateo Alaluf, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium
77. Prof. Em. Biesemans Monique, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium
78. Em. Prof. Fred Louckx, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium
79. Prof. Marc Jacquemain, University of Liege, Belgium
80. Prof. Germain Marc, Université de Lille, France
81. Professeur-chercheur Lucienne Strivay, Université de Liège, Belgium
82. Prof. Gilles-Maurice de Schryver, Ghent University, Belgium
83. Researcher Andrew Crosby, Université libre de Bruxelles, Belgium
84. Prof. Bert Cornillie, KU Leuven, Belgium
85. Docent Dario Giugliano, Accademia di Belle Arti di Napoli, Italy
86. Prof. de Beer Daniel, Université Saint-Louis, Belgium
87. Researcher M Louise Carels, Université de Liège, Belgium
88. Prof. Victor Ginsburgh, Université libre de Bruxelles, Belgium
89. Em. Prof. Heinz D. Hurwitz, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium
90. M.A. Maria Aurora De Angelis, SOAS University of London, UK
91. Dr. Jef Peeters, KU Leuven, Belgium
92. Em. Prof. Magda Devos, University of Ghent, Belgium
93. Em. Prof. Norbert Van den Bergh, Gent University, Belgium
94. Em. Prof. Stefan Kesenne, University of Antwerp, Belgium
95. Prof. Dr. Em. Madeline Lutjeharms, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium
96. Marie Scheirlinck, Belgium
97. Koen Verrept, VUB, Belgium
98. Prof. Roberto Beneduce, University of Turin, Italy
99. Prof. Patricia Willson, Université de Liège, Belgium
100. Em. Prof. Christiane Schomblond, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium
101. Em. Prof. Florimond De Smedt, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium
102. Professeur Honoraire Mormont Marc, Université de Liège, Belgium
103. Dr. Zahidi, University of Antwerpen, Belgium
104. PhD Leena Saraste, Finland
105. Em. Prof. P. Marage, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium
106. Em. Prof. Michel Gevers, Université catholique de Louvain, Belgium
107. Senior Research Associate Giselle Corradi, Ghent University, Belgium
108. Tiziana Terranova, Italy
109. Honorary Prof. Albert Martens, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium
110. Em. Prof. Vandermotten Christian, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium
111. Prof. Jean-Claude Gregoire, Université libre de Bruxeles, Belgium
112. Researcher Xavier May, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium
113. Dr. Duez Colette, University of Liege, Belgium
114. Phd Tanneke Herklots, the Netherlands,
115. Em. Prof. Marc De Meyere, Gent University, Belgium
116. Researcher Antonio Mazzeo, Italy
117. Prof. Michele Carducci, UniSalento – Lecce, Italy
118. Prof. Carine Defoort, KU Leuven, Belgium
119. Dr. Chiara Cardelli, Institute for Quantum Optics and Quantum Information Vienna, Austria
120. Prof. Em. Pieter Saey, Gent University, Belgium
121. Independent scholar Celeste Ianniciello, Italy
122. Em. Prof. Jonathan Rosenhead, London School of Economics, UK
123. Prof. Dr. Em. Erik Van der Straeten, Belgium
124. Prof. James Dickins, University of Leeds, UK
125. Dr. Tajul Islam, University of Leeds, UK
126. Dr. Barry Heselwood, University of Leeds, UK
127. Patrik Lasure, Pax Christi Vlaanderen, Belgium
128. Wim Nerinckx, Belgium
129. René Weemaels, Belgium
130. André Posman, Belgium
131. Technician Kelly Lemeire, University of Ghent, Belgium
132. Em. Prof. Schomblond Christiane, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium
133. Dr. Gie Van Den Berghe, University Gent, Belgium
134. Rasha Soliman, University of Leeds, UK
135. Simona Antonova, UMC Utrecht, the Netherlands
136. PhD Michail Mamantopoulos, Belgium
137. Dr. Tom Moerenhout, Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Switzerland
138. Prof. Dirk Vandermeulen, KU Leuven, Belgium
139. Em. Prof. Heinz Hurwitz, Université Libre Bruxelles, Belgium
140. Sénateur Honoraire Galand Pierre, Belgium
141. Prof. Megan Povey, University of Leeds, UK
142. Branch President UCL UCU Sean Wallis, University College London, UK
143. Dr. M Akhtar, University of Leeds, UK
144. Tom Hickey, University of Brighton, UK
145. Dr. Karen Evans, University of Liverpool, UK
146. Dr. Anne Alexander, University of Cambridge, UK
147. Dr Anandi Ramamurthy, Sheffield Hallam University, UK
148. Prof. Franco Montanari, University of Genoa, Italy
149. Dr. Stephanie Kourula, Belgium
150. Em. Prof. Chris Roberts, University of Manchester, UK
151. Researcher-PhD student Ainhoa Benedicto, Centre Delàs d’Estudis per la Pau, Spain
152. Tica Font, Centre Delàs d’Estudis per la Pau, Spain
153. Researcher Edgard Vega, Centre Delàs d’Estudis per la Pau, Spain
154. Ph Dr. Retired Assistant Professor Xavier Bohigas, Uinversitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Catalonia-Spain
155. Prof. Jan Dumolyn, University of Ghent, Belgium
* Institutions are added for identification purposes only. All signatories have signed the letter in a personal capacity.
Reply With Quote
Unread 06-25-2019, 02:13 AM
rahu rahu is offline
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: 5025 valley crest dr #135 concord ca 94521
Posts: 10,860
Re: The Mossad


When classified FBI files began appearing during the “discovery” phase of litigation, an investigation of this odd phenomenon stumbled over incestuous relationships between top members of AIPAC (the American Israeli Public Affairs Committee) and the ADL (Anti-Defamation League), two organizations then under investigation for espionage against the US in what was later called “The AIPAC Spy Scandal.” From
“The other shoe has finally dropped in the case of the spy scandal involving the American Israeli Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC). In addition to five espionage-related charges filed against former Pentagon analyst Larry Franklin, two counts of conspiracy to communicate classified information to a foreign power have been lodged against former AIPAC foreign policy director Steve Rosen, and a single count of conspiracy against Rosen’s assistant, former AIPAC Iran specialist Keith Weissman.
The latest indictment [.pdf] reads like a spy thriller, and, while some of the elements were already known, there is much that is surprising, including the information that Rosen has apparently been under surveillance since at least 1999.

NEO – Jade Helm and its Repercussions

Jim W. Dean, Managing Editor -

June 23, 2019 2567

by Gordon Duff, VT Sr. Editor, with New Eastern Outlook, Moscow
[ Editor’s Note: Gordon goes deep into the well with this NEO piece to give Jade Helm some historical perspective; and to share with you that its legacy is alive and well.
If you know anyone who missed Jade Helm, be sure to send this piece along to help catch them up on the depths of lunacy inflicted upon the public.
This even touched on a member of VT who swallowed the whole Jade Helm hoax hook, line and sinker, wanting to push it on VT, which we refused and parted ways with the author.
This was not only a failure of government, but all of our security organizations to expose the hoax, which we were able to do quite easily. As usual, no one in media, government, or law enforcement was interested in our saving them a lot of time and money chasing ghosts.
Sadly, not much has changed since then, but only gotten worse, as VT has predicted. The more they get away with, the more they do … Jim W. Dean ]

Jim's Editor’s Notes are solely crowdfunded via PayPal
Jim's work includes research, field trips, Heritage TV Legacy archiving & more. Thanks for helping. Click to donate >>
– First published … May 24, 2019
Four years ago, Americans were told that the US Army planned mass arrests and that “trainloads of shackles” were being shipped into the Western United States to use during the arrests of millions in a massive crackdown on “White conservatives” by the Obama administration.
Alternative media moguls, backed by YouTube’s most powerful conspiracy pundits claimed that huge warehouses had just gone up in the “back woods of Kentucky” and that millions of caskets of those to be executed would be stored there.
  • Their evidence was a Pentagon announcement of a strange but small-scale training exercise, and the closure of 5 Walmart stores, and lots and lots of “dot connecting” by conspiracy theorists, including prominent academics, one state governor and members of congress.
    The trains filled with shackles never existed, the “thrown up overnight warehouses” were built 130 years ago, owned by Makers Mark Distillers for aging their bourbon whiskey. The whole thing was made up.
    However, Texas governor Greg Abbot called up the militia to protect Texans from being shackled and shipped to whiskey warehouses in Kentucky through a maze of tunnels he believed spread across the continent from the “basements” of Walmart stores. Governor Abbot began a de facto insurrection against the United States based on what?
    Jade Helm
    Back in 2015, a bizarre controversy began. The Pentagon began what they called a “training exercise”, which put hundreds of special operations troops in small towns pretending to “infiltrate” communities.
    The backlash turned America upside down and, today, Russia is being blamed. The end result as to how it applied at the time, and today as well, to internet media and independent reporting and analysis, is catastrophic in its impact.
    An investigation has revealed that the hysteria-mongering involving Jade Helm, something we will get into here, was orchestrated by what overtly appears to be a web of FBI, CIA and financial groups, operating in unison, for some purpose. Events over the subsequent four years have helped put that purpose into focus.
    This cabal, as we choose to call it, when seen a few years later, is easily identified as an arm of the Deep State and their purpose, testing out their “chaos theory engine,” the one used so often today, Russiagate, fake Syria gas attacks, the Iran hysteria; and Jade Helm was a testing ground.
    What the investigation has found, however, is that there is much more to this story than simply blaming Russia for the hysteria of the summer of 2015. There was a secondary purpose to “Jade Helm,” and it wasn’t spying on Americans.
    The real source of the hysteria came from an even more shadowy FBI organization, the inheritor of CointelPro, called InfaGard.
    Publicly, InfaGard is a business partnership where corporate officials get security clearances and learn investigative techniques in order to, well frankly, spy on their coworkers for the FBI, just like in CointelPro when the FBI was run by J. Edgar Hoover.
    The truth is far more sinister, InfaGard, founded in Cleveland, Ohio by the FBI’s Counter-Intelligence office there (very active in the Muller investigation as well), was devised by Israeli security to penetrate the FBI itself and take control over counter-intelligence operations.

    I learned about this organization during the early 2000’s when working on international trade related litigation involving Russia and Ukraine.
    An American bank, later learned to have been a portal for laundering CIA drug cash, failed to fund a multi-billion-dollar transaction with Russia and Ukraine involving much of the world’s fertilizer production.
    The impact on world food supplies was catastrophic.
    When classified FBI files began appearing during the “discovery” phase of litigation, an investigation of this odd phenomenon stumbled over incestuous relationships between top members of AIPAC (the American Israeli Public Affairs Committee) and the ADL (Anti-Defamation League), two organizations then under investigation for espionage against the US in what was later called “The AIPAC Spy Scandal.” From
    “The other shoe has finally dropped in the case of the spy scandal involving the American Israeli Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC). In addition to five espionage-related charges filed against former Pentagon analyst Larry Franklin, two counts of conspiracy to communicate classified information to a foreign power have been lodged against former AIPAC foreign policy director Steve Rosen, and a single count of conspiracy against Rosen’s assistant, former AIPAC Iran specialist Keith Weissman.
    The latest indictment [.pdf] reads like a spy thriller, and, while some of the elements were already known, there is much that is surprising, including the information that Rosen has apparently been under surveillance since at least 1999.
    On April 13, 1999, Rosen had a conversation with someone identified as “Foreign Official 1” (FO-1): the AIPAC director told FO-1 that he (Rosen) had “picked up an extremely sensitive piece of intelligence” described by Rosen as “codeword protected intelligence.” According to the indictment, “Rosen then disclosed to FO-1 national defense information concerning terrorist activities in Central Asia.”
    While the identity of “Foreign Official 1” is not yet known, there is no doubt about what foreign country we’re talking about: it is Israel, and without doubt the individuals being observed were officials of the Israel embassy.
    Naor Gilon, Israeli ambassador to Rome One of these has already been identified in the media as Naor Gilon, the embassy’s chief political officer, recently recalled home; the FBI is seeking to interview him, and other Israeli officials who may have been part of the spy cell. Three are mentioned in the indictment.
    What is striking is that the FBI – or whoever – was hot on the trail of AIPAC and “FO-1” even at this early date, listening in on their phone calls and following them around as they met for lunch over spilled beans.
    Yet in order to get authorization for wiretaps, especially of an American citizen, law enforcement must go to a federal judge for authorization – and, remember, this was before 9/11, when the legal bar was set far higher.
    So, they had a good reason to be listening in on Israeli officials and their American sockpuppets and shadowing their movements. The discovery that AIPAC officials were in possession of highly classified, top-secret information procured from U.S. government officials was apparently part and parcel of an ongoing investigation – but into what? Sparked by what?
    The issue here, and how it ties to Jade Helm, is simple, in some ways at least. The same organization that infiltrated the FBI through InfaGard in Cleveland, not only managed the AIPAC investigation; but it later turned out that informants working for this group, some directly tied to the CIA’s Israeli-run banking front that laundered drug cash out of Denver, Colorado and Cleveland, Ohio, also ran the real “bot” that spread the hysteria over Jade Helm.
    What our investigation also showed is that InfaGard is a mechanism for “well poisoning” of the alternative media. Using FBI informants with arrest histories – invariably “marginal types” – reporting on human trafficking, Israeli spying, school shootings, election rigging and dozens of others now recognized as Deep State methodologies was infiltrated and derailed.
    Ted Gunderson InfaGard’s first “outing” involved discrediting former FBI official Ted Gunderson and his investigation into child sex trafficking. From Wikipedia:
    “After retiring from the FBI, Gunderson set up a private investigation firm, Ted L. Gunderson and Associates, in Santa Monica. In 1980, he became a defense investigator for Green Beret doctor Jeffrey R. MacDonald, who had been convicted of the 1970 murders of his pregnant wife and two daughters.
    “Gunderson obtained affidavits from Helena Stoeckley confessing to her involvement in the murders which she claimed had in actuality been perpetrated by a Satanic cult of which she was a member.
    “He also investigated a child molestation trial in Manhattan Beach, California. In a 1995 conference in Dallas, Gunderson warned about the supposed proliferation of secret occultist groups, and the danger posed by the New World Order, an alleged shadow government that would be controlling the United States government.
    “He also claimed that a “slave auction” in which children were sold by Saudi agents to men had been held in Las Vegas, that four thousand ritual human sacrifices are performed in New York City every year, and that the 1995 bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City was carried out by the US government.
    “Gunderson believed that in the United States there is a secret widespread network of groups who kidnap children and infants, and subject them to ritual abuse and subsequent human sacrifice.”
    Operatives of InfaGard, some later involved in the Jade Helm hysteria, stole files from Gunderson’s apartment, while Gunderson himself presented evidence of cyanide and arsenic poisoning.
    A great controversy of 2019 is the cleansing of the entire internet by “truth panels” and algorithms approved by tech and media conglomerates that constitute the most active arm of the Deep State.
    The fight against “fake news,” invariably led by Deep State operatives aided by their corporate fake news lackeys is part of a process begun when the real power of device-driven hysteria came into focus, we believe, with Jade Helm.
    The wave of what is portrayed as censorship and suppression is, in actuality, something quite different. It is distraction. The allegedly “targeted” media organizations are, in themselves, long a part of the Deep State and the half-hearted attacks by social media moguls are “false flags.”
    Distraction makes any and all things possible — any lie can be sold, any revelation managed, “spun” and drowned in fake narrative. There was a watershed, and this was the summer of 2015 and the event known as “Jade Helm.”
    We begin with what is probably “the truth.” Jade Helm was an announced US Army exercise involving around 1000 special operations troops who would be learning infiltration techniques in towns in the southwestern United States. The reason for choosing this area is simple – that’s where the bases are.
    I met with the planners of Jade Helm in March 2019 and asked them a simple question; “What were you thinking?” Imagine special operations troops with their fake Afghanistan beards, their military tattoos and their pickup trucks covered with US Army stickers, walking up and down the streets of small farming communities “trying to fit in” after a national announcement was made of a “secret exercise.”
    Why the announcement? Wouldn’t that destroy the experiment and, whatever else it might be, Jade Helm was an experiment.
What people asked was simple, why is the US Army training to invade the US? Then things got really out of hand. However, what I did learn when questioning the planners of Jade Helm was that they were exactly as stupid as suspected, no common sense, too much time on their hands and poor judgment.
They were “military people.”
Today, in the aftermath of Jade Helm, the nation is still reeling. Predictably, “the usual suspects,” most often led by former CIA Director Mike Hayden, chose to blame the Russians. It wasn’t the Russians at all, not this time, not the election, but we are getting ahead of ourselves. From the Houston Chronicle, May 3, 2018:
“Ex CIA director: hysteria over Jade Helm 15 military exercise fueled by Russians
Russians were behind the Texas furor over the Jade Helm 15 federal military exercise nearly three years ago, which drew so much concern that Gov. Greg Abbott directed the State Guard to monitor the operation, former CIA director Michael Hayden said Thursday.
Hayden, a retired Air Force general who headed the National Security Agency from 1999-2005, said Russian bots amplified conspiracy theories about the U.S. Special Operations Command exercise.
He believes the bots, mostly likely created by a Russian organization called the Internet Research Agency in St. Petersburg, flooded American social media with unsubstantiated claims about the exercise, which took place in Texas and six other states.
‘They’ve got the Russians feeding this story that Jade Helm is an attempt by the Obama administration to round up political opponents, and actually the Russians didn’t have to create the story. That story came out of American alt-right media, Alex Jones, Infowars,” said Hayden, who detailed the operation in a new book. “The bots and the alt-right media were blaring that this exercise was merely a ruse, a cover story, for Obama to arrest political opponents.’
Published this week, Hayden’s book, ‘The Assault on Intelligence: American National Security in an Age of Lies,’ explores Russia’s focus on information warfare. He contended that the Russians “took their game to North America in 2015.”
It became a test run for something much bigger — widespread interference in the U.S. presidential campaign. Hayden, a commander of what was then known as the Air Intelligence Agency on Joint Base San Antonio-Lackland from 1996-97, said he believed the success of the Jade Helm disinformation campaign caused Moscow to take things to the next level.”
Spinning Jade Helm
The key to recognizing an FBI counter-intelligence operation, or rather as in this case, one using the FBI on behalf of Deep State operatives, requires relatively simple counter-intelligence methodologies.
Key to much of what has turned out to be Deep State controlled fake alternative media simply requires use or normal profiling tools. Who pays the bills, why have they been pushed to such lofty heights?
None of those so-called activists have a history that explains radicalization or social interests of any kind, no politics, no personal struggles, no years of angst and suffering. Most seem to be simply actors or small-time broadcasters willing to say or do anything for money.
There is one common thread, mediocrity.
We have, of course, also described the Pentagon and Congress as well.
Who are the real activists? In the US, most social activism began during the Vietnam War, another watershed, a war so utterly corrupt that no sane person could have supported it. With the end of that war, and the decline of social activism to its almost non-existent levels, it has become much more difficult to identify “goose” from “gander” when judging motivations.
When the “war against the war” died, activism in the United States died as well, with events such as “Occupy” no more than a death throe.

Jade Helm Hysteria
The new rules for the media really hit with Jade Helm “reporting.” The gulf between “shock jock” conspiracy media and the “tabloid MSM’ were bridged. Long before this, the real powers, Hannity had gone this far or further, with hundreds of fake scandals under their belts.
Making up conspiracies had been around for a very long time, it just hadn’t been turned into a science.
Many claim that Trump’s policies are set by conspiracy “shock jock” Sean Hannity, who is the power behind Rupert Murdoch’s largest media platform, Fox News. Russophobia, fake populism and drumming for war against any nation standing up to Israel is the “daily bread” of Murdoch, and his mouthpiece, Hannity.
With Jade Helm, however, other platforms, “second tier” pod casters and bloggers, who parrot Hannity and the Murdoch organization, some with direct ties to not only Murdoch but the long-suspected Bronfman family in Canada, moved to the forefront.
With 30 million Americans told they face arrest and even murder by their own military, viewer/listener/reader counts on YouTube, podcasts and extremist blogs hit the tens of millions.
With each massive jump in numbers, the stories got crazier and crazier while noted academics and analysts joined in the fray, confirming the stories of government-sponsored mass killings and making up wild tales of their own.
Making up attention grabbing lies had become a sport.
Let me describe one such event. A single internet podcast, with up to 30 million listeners, outlined “counter-measures” to be used by Americans to protect themselves from mass killings of civilians by the US military. Hosting were two InfaGard/FBI “enrollees” and two unsuspecting prominent activists.
During the podcast, directions were given for making chlorine gas bombs and how they should be deployed against the US military if seen off base. Most US military live off base with their families and number nearly 2 million.
As common sense seemed to drift away, and while millions listened, techniques for throwing chlorine gas bombs from moving vehicles were discussed along with how to pick targets, which included military families on shopping outings.
There was no FBI investigation after the broadcast. Nobody’s Google or Facebook account was suspended, no YouTube accounts limited, in fact, no repercussions whatsoever.
In fact, several Republican members of congress brought up aspects of the broadcast including Rep. Louie Gohmert (TX-01), a Republican. His statement in its entirety, from his Congressional website, dated May 5, 2015. Note that Gohmert was Chairman of the House Committee on Terrorism and Homeland Security:
Rep. Louie Gohmert (TX-01) released the following statement on the ‘Jade Helm 15’ exercises scheduled to take place in Texas and various other states:
“Over the past few weeks, my office has been inundated with calls referring to the Jade Helm 15 military exercise scheduled to take place between July 15 and September 15, 2015. This military practice has some concerned that the U.S. Army is preparing for modern-day martial law.
Certainly, I can understand these concerns. When leaders within the current administration believe that major threats to the country include those who support the Constitution, are military veterans, or even ‘cling to guns or religion,’ patriotic Americans have reason to be concerned. We have seen people working in this administration use their government positions to persecute people with conservative beliefs in God, country, and notions such as honor and self-reliance.
Because of the contempt and antipathy for the true patriots or even Christian saints persecuted for their Christian beliefs, it is no surprise that those who have experienced or noticed such persecution are legitimately suspicious.
Having served in the U.S. Army, I can understand why military officials have a goal to see if groups of Special Forces can move around a civilian population without being noticed and can handle various threat scenarios. In military science classes or in my years on active duty, I have participated in or observed military exercises; however, we never named an existing city or state as a “hostile.” We would use fictitious names before we would do such a thing.
Once I observed the map depicting ‘hostile,’ ‘permissive,’ and ‘uncertain’ states and locations, I was rather appalled that the hostile areas amazingly have a Republican majority, ‘cling to their guns and religion,’ and believe in the sanctity of the United States Constitution. When the federal government begins, even in practice, games or exercises, to consider any U.S. city or state in ‘hostile’ control and trying to retake it, the message becomes extremely calloused and suspicious.
Such labeling tends to make people who have grown leery of federal government overreach become suspicious of whether their big brother government anticipates certain states may start another civil war or be overtaken by foreign radical Islamist elements which have been reported to be just across our border. Such labeling by a government that is normally not allowed to use military force against its own citizens is an affront to the residents of that particular state considered as ‘hostile,’ as if the government is trying to provoke a fight with them.
The map of the exercise needs to change, the names on the map need to change, and the tone of the exercise needs to be completely revamped so the federal government is not intentionally practicing war against its own states.”
Congressman Gohmert is the Chairman of the Natural Resources Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations and the Vice Chair of the Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism and Homeland Security.
Prior to being elected to serve in Congress, he was elected to three terms as District Judge in Smith County, Texas and was appointed by then Texas Governor Rick Perry to complete a term as Chief Justice of the 12th Court of Appeals.
This was 2015. The military operation, Jade Helm, has been ongoing for 4 years now, from what we understand with less than two dozen “operatives.” Nobody was murdered, nobody shipped by underground tunnel to imaginary prisons.
What we did see is this, the ability of governmental organizations to destabilize the United States and push it into hysteria. Was the Army involved in the end result as well, staging the entire exercise in order to feed public fear?
What we also “tripped over” was an organization within the FBI, accessing secrets, influencing investigations and undermining public confidence.
What we also saw is that the belief that mainstream and alternative media are not “one in the same” is simply not based in reality. Fake media is fake media and money is money.
We also found an agenda, the use of fake events, of false flag terrorism and of media abuse in destabilizing and undermining institutions.
Moreover, we have inexorably proven that the ability of the Deep State to orchestrate mass hysteria has increased exponentially.
Gordon Duff is a Marine combat veteran of the Vietnam War that has worked on veterans and POW issues for decades and consulted with governments challenged by security issues. He’s a senior editor and chairman of the board of Veterans Today, especially for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook

Last edited by rahu; 06-25-2019 at 02:20 AM.
Reply With Quote
Unread 06-25-2019, 10:08 PM
rahu rahu is offline
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: 5025 valley crest dr #135 concord ca 94521
Posts: 10,860
Re: The Mossad


Democrats Ambushed Over Israel & Microsoft & Pentagon Cloud Security

Kevin Barrett -

June 21, 2019 4

If you thought Jonathan Pollard was bad—a great many Americans died as a result of his treason—get a load of the Pentagon’s plan to hand its Cloud over to Israel!
In this video by exiled Aussie activist Brendon O’Connell (he will be a guest on my live radio show tonight 9 to 10 pm Eastern on Revolution.Radio) Jeremy Rothe-Kushel stars as a patriotic American Jew doing his best to alert presidential candidates to one of the gravest national security threats in US history. And guess what? It ain’t fiction!
Kevin Barrett, Veterans Today Editor

Last edited by rahu; 06-25-2019 at 10:11 PM.
Reply With Quote
Unread 06-28-2019, 02:41 AM
rahu rahu is offline
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: 5025 valley crest dr #135 concord ca 94521
Posts: 10,860
Re: The Mossad


How Israel’s Desire For Nuclear Weapons Destroyed the USA

Ian Greenhalgh -

June 26, 2019 10

By Ian Greenhalgh, Editor, with Introduction by the Senior Editor
Iran has made it clear, Trump isn’t in charge and doesn’t really care who knows it. His hollow threats, always ready to nuke somebody or save us all from madman Bolton…this is why I wrote the article for the Russian audience titled “Lesser men.”
Never before has the door to the creepy underworld of the Deep State opened to such a degree, for those who know what to look for, as it has under Trump.g
Israel had JFK killed because he wouldn’t let them have nuclear weapons. The Permindex corporation was the organisation who carried it out and Permindex was the front for Mossad operations in North America. Key Mossad figures like Tibor Rosenbaum, Louis M Bloomfield and Roy Cohn were involved in Permindex, the Canadian Bronfman family helped fund it, they used both CIA and Jewish mafia assets (Meyer Lansky was always happy to help Israel).
Cohn was Trump’s mentor, he created Donald Trump, which means from day one, Trump was under Israeli control as Cohn ran a huge pedophile ring in Washington/New York that ensnared politicians and officials in order to gather compromising material on them and thus allow Mossad to control them. Trump will have been compromised and controlled from the start; today, the pedo rings to control politicians still run, Jeffrey Epstein ran it, his assistant/handler was Ghislaine Maxwell, daughter of the notorious Mossad agent Robert Maxwell, one of the key locations they used to fly the bigwigs to was Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort.
So does anyone really doubt that Trump isn’t controlled by Israel? The Russian ties exist, since 1991, but it is with the Russian Jewish mafia – the Trump organisation laundered a lot of the huge sums of money the Russian Jewish mafia oligarchs stole in the 90s, something that was natural for Trump to do as he had spent his business career upto that point laundering money for the Jewish mafia in the US, that is why all his projects in Las Vegas, Atlantic City etc. failed, supposedly losing hundreds of millions – they were intended to fail, they were just scams to launder mafia money.
The Israelis have hundreds of nukes, many of them made in the USA, some made in the USSR. We know from Mordecai Vanunu that the Dimona reactor had to be shut down around 1985 because they had worn it out through over use. So they needed a new source of bomb building materials and leveraged their compromising material on George Bush Sr. to enact the theft of 350 warheads from the Pantex decommissioning plant in Texas, these were mini nukes and some of them were used to create the nukes used on 9-11. There was also theft from the stockpiles in the USSR, particularly after the USSR broke up, the Russian Jewish mafia were involved, they have largely taken over Israel since 1995.
Nuclear non-proliferation has always been a joke, Ben Gurion was always adamant that Israel had to have nukes to survive, JFK had to die to achieve this, Israeli control of the US government, largely through pedophile rings, enabled Israeli to obtain all the nukes it needed, Israel is a criminal enterprise posing as a nation state, a mafia with nukes.
Reply With Quote
Unread 06-30-2019, 09:00 PM
rahu rahu is offline
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: 5025 valley crest dr #135 concord ca 94521
Posts: 10,860
Re: The Mossad


100 years ago: US supports Zionist project for Israeli homeland

"The Americans were watching the [British] Mandate begin, and Christian Zionists in America were seeking a political expression in the world."
Ian Greenhalgh -

September 21, 2018 9

[Editor’s note: While most have heard of the 1916 Balfour Declaration that laid the foundation for the state of Israel, there was another political decision, made a few years later that was equally important in the path to the creation of a Zionist state in Palestine and it was made by US president Warren G. Harding. With hindsight, it is clear that the Judeo-Zionist lobby was able to influence presidents back then just as it does today. Ian]

In a long list of presidential supporters of the Jewish people and the State of Israel, Warren G. Harding made his mark on September 21, 1922, when he signed a joint resolution to establish a Jewish homeland in Mandatory Palestine.
The US “favors the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of Christian and all other non-Jewish communities in Palestine,” the Lodge-Fish joint resolution read. “And that the Holy places and religious buildings and sites in Palestine shall be adequately protected.”
New York Rep. Hamilton Fish Jr., one of the resolution’s initiators along with Massachusetts Sen. Henry Cabot Lodge, declared that the resolution “is based on justice and humanity,” and Massachusetts Rep. James A. Gallivan said that he hoped America’s sympathy, as expressed through the resolution, “will be a source of encouragement to the Jewish people to their struggle to repatriate themselves to the land from which they were exile by force.”
In “Partners Together in This Great Enterprise,” David W. Schmidt writes that a significant political breakthrough for Zionism was taking place after World War I, with Congress passing several resolutions in favor of the establishment of a Jewish state in British Mandatory Palestine.
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:34 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2005-2018, Boards' structure and all posts are property of and their respective creators. No part of the messages sent on these boards may be copied without their owners' explicit consent.