david starling
Well-known member
I'd love to know how this all ends too, because I've been trying to figure out the story of my nodes for a long time. On top of the frustration of having the node signs in the houses of their opposite signs and the lack of distinguishing houses from signs in most astrological literature, I'm also stuck wondering how someone doing things in a by the book could possibly manifest in an aquarian outcome, since aquarian energy is literally defined by doing with innovation instead of deferring to established and certain methods. My Saturn in Capricorn ruler makes absolutely no sense in terms of how it is described and in terms of how it supposedly rules my Aquarian north node.
The definitions of Aquarius itself leaves so much to be confused by. People talking about "being in balance with society and the group", but humanitarians were always at odds with the beliefs of society and the group and trusted their own ideas and beliefs instead of submitting to those of society, which is what made them humanitarians.
If this isn't solved and there isn't consensus among astrologers, as far as I am concerned, all the writing about anything related to Aquarius house cusps or nodal points is completely worthless.
Aquarius is the Sign of intelligent solutions.
Saturn is the Planet of insolvable problems, and is therefore out of place in Aquarius.
Last edited: