https://www.astrologyweekly.com/forum/showpost.php?p=988447&postcount=1229I feel shocked and upset that Rahu has been banned.
He is an exceptional astrologer
and if anyone knows how to get in touch with him
I would be grateful to hear.
I wish him the best, wherever he is..
I see that on one of these posts,
rahu linked back to something he posted on Lindaland, under the name Todd.
I have no idea if he's reachable at that site, but maybe.
While he's no longer allowed here, there's no reason
friends of his can't contact him elsewhere, if they have a way.
Thank you all, for your input, much appreciated, this has really been bothering me.
(By the way, JUPITERASC, as a result of your ref to Lindaland, another "shock" I recently discovered .. that the entire website is now dead !!)
***********
All the same, the Question that remains Unanswered is
> Was the Price WORTH it ? <
If mental illness is a factor, then shouldn't allowances have been made?
A longstanding member with a history of 10,000 posts, suddenly Outed?
I have followed many of his threads over past years, including most recent.
I have seen NOTHING that could be deemed "offensive" in any way. (Feel free to correct me if you think I'm wrong and have missed anything...)
David S - I hardly think that he decided to suddenly, out of the blue , decide to launch missive of accusations at the moderators!!!
Using logic and reasoning, I would deduce that it was the moderator(s) who approached him first..
Agree?
The Question then, is to ask .. Why?
Transiting Saturn was tweaking the transiting SN on the day he was banned. Maybe that somehow set him off when he got a moderator warning of unknown specificity. He is extremely attuned to the Nodes.
"When he got a moderator warning of unknown specifity"
Right! Now you're following. He got approached FIRST.
So, next Question has to be, >> WHY?<<
that's correct - all members are given more than one warning??? Where are you coming from? Your earlier comment doesn't make sense/is irrational
I was saying that Rahu must have been approached by a moderator FIRST.
Is this not a logical deduction?
that's correct - all members are given more than one warning
banning occcurs only after several warnings have been ignored
I wonder what he was being warned about.
(It must have been political?)
Its a huge loss, and still a mystery that he got banned after so many years.
I never saw any verbal abuse.
Like I said, he must have been doing something
that prompted a moderator to issue a warning in the first place.
(-and what was it that he was doing?)