love-thinking
Well-known member
I feel like this part of astrology has been and will continue to be the hardest domain for me to assess.
I'll explain why. Lots of astrologer's when talking of temperaments, they specified some rules. For example:
Born in the winter despite your sign, there's a phlagmetic vibe to you,
spring-saungine
summer-choleric
fall-meloncholic
Then you have moon phases.
Then you have this general argument of whether or not or how sun, asc and moon signs and aspects work with eachother to create the persona.
For example it is generally agreed that the sun is your personality/what you put your energy in, moon is how you react, and asc is how you look like/come off to as other(the face you put up for the world to see). But many people simply say I relate more to my asc, sun, or moon.
But then there's the argument that aspects are superior to any sign.
But how do we assess temperament. How do we tell someone, this is how your personality is. If at most we'll get 80 percent right if we are lucky.
But here's another question.
Planets have temperaments.
So if we were to assess personality through sun, how would we do that?
How different is Sun conjunct pluto from sun conjunct mars conjunct neptune(if neptune is phlagmetic, and mars is choleric and pluto is said to have both attributes)? And what if they are in the same element, both born in winter time?
I also say this because there was a study indicating that mars and neptune creates psychologists and I will post the link for anyone that wants to see it. So for me this seems to me like the marrying of choleric and phlagmetic kind of like pluto.
How different are sun conjunct neptune from sun conjunct moon and jupiter?
I can't think of any other combinations that will make up a similar personality trait to another planet/sign. But insight on this topic will be nice.
What I'm trying to say is by the virtue of the composition of the temperaments involved itself(the mixture), is it possible to have a very similar manifestation of personality traits? And I'm not speaking of predictive astrology, simply in regards to the general temperament.
I'll explain why. Lots of astrologer's when talking of temperaments, they specified some rules. For example:
Born in the winter despite your sign, there's a phlagmetic vibe to you,
spring-saungine
summer-choleric
fall-meloncholic
Then you have moon phases.
Then you have this general argument of whether or not or how sun, asc and moon signs and aspects work with eachother to create the persona.
For example it is generally agreed that the sun is your personality/what you put your energy in, moon is how you react, and asc is how you look like/come off to as other(the face you put up for the world to see). But many people simply say I relate more to my asc, sun, or moon.
But then there's the argument that aspects are superior to any sign.
But how do we assess temperament. How do we tell someone, this is how your personality is. If at most we'll get 80 percent right if we are lucky.
But here's another question.
Planets have temperaments.
So if we were to assess personality through sun, how would we do that?
How different is Sun conjunct pluto from sun conjunct mars conjunct neptune(if neptune is phlagmetic, and mars is choleric and pluto is said to have both attributes)? And what if they are in the same element, both born in winter time?
I also say this because there was a study indicating that mars and neptune creates psychologists and I will post the link for anyone that wants to see it. So for me this seems to me like the marrying of choleric and phlagmetic kind of like pluto.
How different are sun conjunct neptune from sun conjunct moon and jupiter?
I can't think of any other combinations that will make up a similar personality trait to another planet/sign. But insight on this topic will be nice.
What I'm trying to say is by the virtue of the composition of the temperaments involved itself(the mixture), is it possible to have a very similar manifestation of personality traits? And I'm not speaking of predictive astrology, simply in regards to the general temperament.