Synastry & composite charts included -- is this UNREQUITED "love"?

Reincarnate

New member
At the outset, the man's birth time is unfortunately unknown. On his birthday, his Moon was anywhere between 13 degrees to 26 degrees in Leo.

The woman is on the outside of the synastry chart.

The man places -- aside from his Venus -- mostly external planets on the woman's inner planets. His Venus, however, is conjunct the woman's Sun, squares her Moon, trines her ascendant and Mars, etc. It is strange that of all his inner planets, only Venus seems to be making contacts with so many of her inner planets. It is esp sad because she is obsessed with him (his Pluto trine her Venus). Is this a case of "unrequited" love?

Your thoughts, please? Thank you for your time. Much appreciated.
 

Attachments

  • SYNASTRY.jpg
    SYNASTRY.jpg
    65.5 KB · Views: 62
  • COMPOSITE (2).jpg
    COMPOSITE (2).jpg
    68.2 KB · Views: 53
Last edited:

Osamenor

Staff member
First of all, the composite chart isn't valid. The exact time, exact place, and exact date of birth for both parties have to be used to cast a composite chart. If you don't know the birth time for one of them, there's no way the composite chart can be accurate.

Even if you did have both parties' complete birth information, they would have to have an established relationship with each other for a composite chart to have any meaning. A composite chart is the chart for the relationship as an entity. For the chart to mean anything, the relationship as an entity has to exist. If it did, there would be no question of unrequited love. That you're asking that question proves it does not.

The synastry chart can give us a sense of what the dynamics between these people would be if they had a relationship with each other, but it doesn't tell us whether or not they do, ever did, or will. It doesn't tell us how either of them feels about the other at this time. To learn that, you would have to ask the people themselves, not the stars.

Obviously, you can't ask the people involved, because there's no way the man could still be living. He was born in 1907. That would make him 114 years old (115 later this year). There are no men older than 112 in the world.
 
Last edited:
Top