The SYNCHRONICITY doesn't require materialistic Physics. The Earth's magnetic field is clearly strong enough to affect our own personal fields, and our own fields relative to one another are strong enough as well. WHY the synchronicity works concerning the Chart configurations is a mystery, which is why those prejudiced against Astrology simply dismiss it out of hand. I'm not imputing materialistic-magnetic field influence to the Planets other than Earth. Personally, I believe in the theory of an "Astral Plane", with its own characteristics, which aren't described by materialistic Physics. But if you're trying to convince skeptics that Astrology works, neither that nor "Synchronicity" will impress them.
It isn't a mystery, it's mathematical. That's been my point from the start.
There is a particular type of person that delights in obscurity and the mystification of the mundane through poetry and misinformation. I don't have an issue with your proclivity to live your life in this way, David, but please understand that I live life according to observable facts. I'm not interested in poetry or mysticism, I'm interested in understanding. That's what gets me out of bed everyday, the boundless quest for comprehension of things that lay beyond the veil of ignorance.
So when I tell you that one idea or another has no basis in proven, solid scientific fact, I'm not doing so out of some ridiculous sense of superiority (since I've never been, nor will I ever be) but out of the same sort of steady curiosity that has created countless marvels throughout the centuries. "Astral planes," healing crystals and bio-energy fields that interact with solar systems are outside the purview of science. They make great stories, but they are poor explanations for natural phenomena. In truth, the natural world is simply more mundane than someone in your position may be comfortable with, while simultaneously being incredibly complex and structured. I understand that both of these facts of life may run counter to your personal ideals and beliefs.
That said, the methods I aim to employ are generated in a 'language' of logic that speaks directly to the rational skeptic's mind. You may be convinced my efforts will not bear fruit, as you believe that skeptics are stubborn and unbending forms of concentrated bias. But you don't speak their language. I do, which grants me an advantage in targeting a specific vulnerability in their outlook. Namely, as I've said before in some other earlier thread, my employment of tangible data. That is to say, successful long-term relationships, as well as a swift, passionate and
predetermined attraction between multiple couples. The data will speak for itself, thus proving my point. The issue is getting people in our lazy, skeptical, socially neutered culture to take part in the experiment. And when all people do is complain about how it will never work, they make it difficult for me to show them how wrong they are and how much better things can be.
It's honestly sad how self-defeating and pessimistic our culture is these days. But, no, once I have the data (and it will happen in time; it's a matter of when, not if) I have no concern that my efforts won't bear fruit.
It began to make much more sense to me. I started to read the other aspects in my chart. From then on my interests has grown rapidly and I signed up for this site today 
