Cap
Well-known member
11.8
One who knows for certain
that this manifold and wonderful universe
is nothing
becomes desireless Awareness
and abides in the stillness of No-thing.
https://www.holybooks.com/wp-content/uploads/Ashtavakra-Gita-ebook.pdf
Hi Monk
Hi Jup,
As you write about special days that have significance,
i thought i would bring to the table another for discussion!
It is very new, we seem to have days for everything these days, but involves 12th November 2016,
on that date forward it is Scottish Rite Day relating to very high ranking Freemasons, link Below:-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EvvPuGC2m6g
You may wonder where is the alignment is to Sirius, but i give you a puzzle to ponder, to where is the alignment?
Clues are, it isn't in America or Paris, yet always remember
SCOTTISH RITE!
I have made it too easy for you.
Hi Jup, thanks for the link.Hi Monk
Masonic Education
#27 Scottish Rite Day 2016
Part 2 Particpants Interviews
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=herz79mw8TM
Thanks MonkHi Jup, thanks for the link.
The only alignment i could find on 12 November 2016, which is fairly static
is as Sun set by Ancient Greek day marker, being previous day, Sirius was rising!
I had to chase this alignment around the world, but found it
at location below, LOL, I will add graph later!
https://www.rosslynchapel.com/
Odditys most recent comment was two months agods, do you think Oddity will suddenly online?
Sorry, Jup,Hi Jup, thanks for the link.
The only alignment i could find on 12 November 2016, which is fairly static is as Sun set by Ancient Greek day marker, being previous day, Sirius was rising!
I had to chase this alignment around the world, but found it at location below, LOL, I will add graph later!
https://www.rosslynchapel.com/
Odditys most recent comment was two months ago
at https://www.astrologyweekly.com/forum/showpost.php?p=964347&postcount=5
but Oddity did mention being on discord
so check there
SunOr perhaps you switch
to using special measurements for the northern hemisphere, Jupiter?
if so than it is very unfortunate if you underestimate the people born at the equator
because I believe that cosmos is not a racist.
But by the way your thread "moon location" is still active until this moment.
Lmao.
because I believe that cosmos is not a racist
keep in mind also the dark and bright onesThere is a lot of evidence to suggest that there exist three distinct human races
- northern hemispherean, southern hemispherean, and equatorian.
The last may not have a zodiac based on the latitudinal segregation.
''and they are entirely humble and miserable in their fortunes when neither of the luminaries is angular, or in a masculine sign, or attended by the beneficent planets'' - http://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Ptolemy/Tetrabiblos/home.html
''Duality as a proxy for extroversion .— People born under bright signs (odd numbered) have been found to be more extroverted than those born under dark signs (even numbered). Across studies, this sign duality effect size is positive and homogeneous ( Mayo, et al ., 1978 ; Smithers & Cooper, 1978 ; Jackson, 1979 ; Veno & Pamment, 1979 ; Jackson & Fiebert, 1980 ; Saklofske, Kelly, & McKerracher, 1982 ; van Rooij, Brak, & Commandeur, 1988 ; Clarke, et al ., 1996 ). The mediation model in Fig. 1 posits that extroverted temperament ties variables in the self-concept factor to the positive emotions of warmth, contentment, and sociability ( Von Dras & Siegler, 1997 ; Lucas, Le, & Dyrenforth, 2008 ; Watson, Stasik, Ellickson-Larew, & Stanton, 2015 ). Extroverted temperament is driven by the cooperative affect system ( Hamilton, et al ., 2008 ). In tests of BST, indicators of self-esteem are antecedent to empathy, with empathy increasing bonding (Tafoya & Hamilton, 2010). Sociability, in turn, should facilitate fame...
Next, the effect of duality (brightness-darkness) on celebrities-per-sign was examined with a t test. As predicted in Fig. 1 , those with bright sign births (M = 26.33, SD = 10.56) were more likely to be celebrities than those with dark sign births (M = 23.67, SD = 6.44). This brightness effect was modest in size (t304.59 = 3.27, p < .001, η = 0.16). The variances for the two types of sign were significantly different (Levene’s F = 25.45, p < .001).'' - https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.2466/17.CP.4.7
So by factoring whether the Sun is in a masculine sign (among many other things) within a natal reading, you are factoring a statistically objective phenomenon. Authors pose the question whether this and other observed sun-sign differences are due to seasonal influences (at birth, conception or pregnancy), or due to cultural factors like starting school when born with a certain month. The latter is not as exciting.
Game 6 June 13th, @ G.S. 6:00 P.M. PST. ??? Durant definitely out.