Thanks to the moderator for editing Mr. Bob's critique of my post and for removing my defensive response. I surmise that this thread has run it's short course, however in the interest of students just learning about delineations, I feel it necessary to address some of the statements, lest there be contradictory impressions left unanswered. Thus with respect, I would like to re-address a few things for clarification:
It is indicated that my delineation of the square aspect is incorrect. I was addressing the larger cyclical nature of transiting aspects which always need to be considered in interpreting aspects; one needs to consider the overall picture; trends of the planetary energy of the greater planets begin with a conjunction to a planet, representing the beginning phase; when the planet then moves subsequently to form a square to that same planet, this does represent a transitional period for the particular theme already being played out. I stated that at a square,new impulses arising from a conjunction are put to the test - there is a manifestation crisis. I might qualify that by saying that there is tension and renewed concern about what occurred at the time of the last conjunction of the same planets; Now this especially relates to the larger mega-cycles of planetary influence as they affect global matters, which I was talking about and is explained in detail in the book: Astrocycles: How to Make the Major Planetary Cycles Work for You by Vivian B. Martin...you see my statements were not just based on one source..this is about seeing the overall picture rather than just a random interpretation of each individual aspect by transit...they are all connected. I ask what others interpret as the meaning of the square...RE: my statement about Pluto in Capricorn tearing down the establishment was dismissed as follows: That is not the signification, if for no other reason than it is highly ethnocentric. What then is your explanation about this astrological implication?
My statement 'Uranus in Aries is about overt rebellion and the struggle for autonomy'. Response: that is also incorrect...do tell! I do stand by my statement, but that does not mean exclusively as the only interpretation. The crux of the matter is this, regarding the main essence of my post: 'The global meltdown is about raising our consciousness to a higher plane of awareness of a new, and a more spiritual paradigm of reality': response There is no global meltdown. Of course, if one believes this, it must be true...Many others disagree however...the symbolism of astrology is about more than just mundane calculations on the level of the physical and material...as a holistic practice, it must leave room for spiritual translations as well, that expand beyond the level of the subconscious mind and into the realms of higher conscious and awareness...the implications of Neptune [enlightenment], Uranus [the creative intellect; innovation and progress] and Pluto [transformation] are widely accepted as being spiritual in nature as well...I do agree that disagreement is acceptable on the forum but it is also expected that disagreement will also be followed up by alternative interpretations...not by mere dismissal or denial.