The Donald Prez and Puppet Dictator

rahu

Banned
New York Times JAN 29 2017
David Barstow
" trump was a serial fabulist whose biggest-best boasts about everything he touched routinely crumbled under the slightest scrutiny .....yet even jaded connoiseurs of oval office dissembling were astonished over the last week by the torrent of bogus claims that gushed from President Trump during his first days in office."

"we've never seen anything as bizarre in our lifetimes,where up is down and down is up and everything is in question and nothing is real"
Charles Lewis

seems sedana square to Saturn and the vertex is an aspect of disingenuity and out right lies. the mercury/Neptune square clearly brings out trump's duplicity.

but these lies are all just a cover for his chiron/Jupiter conjunction. He has already made it clear he will be a dictator as the most controversial decisions are being handled with executive orders.

we'll seen how the nation and world reacts when by executive order, trump moves the American embassy to Jerusalem as netayahu is demanding.

rahu
 
Last edited:

rahu

Banned
https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/826256357703696384?t=1&cn=ZmxleGlibGVfcmVjcw%3D%3D&refsrc=email&iid=4cbd427eb61f468ab642a28f750d094b&uid=743569102443208704&nid=244+276893697
For those who want the short story as to why Donald Trump was chosen to lead the nation out of the monumental mess that was created by the international banking crime syndicate, please consult the following crucial article—it’s all there.
TRUMP: The NWO Cabal’s Nuclear Option—To Declare A US, Inc. Bankruptcy
If you read the preceding article, you will notice that there is no reference to Donald Trump’s understanding of who he really works for. Whether he is cognizant of any handlers in the room, if there are handlers, is not addressed. Likewise, whether he knows that he — ultimately — answers to the banking “Masters of the Universe” is not addressed.
 
Last edited:

JUPITERASC

Well-known member
When I hear him talking I remember Hugo Chavez
because their ideas are so crazy.
With a two-party system of voting
EVERY President is rejected by 50% of voters

He is really offensive with people who are against him.
That is not unusual :smile:


215076d5a332da23b4a7a24c22765d50.jpg
 

Kuntuzangmo

Well-known member
It's no secret that many Dems. who wanted Sanders would never vote
for Clinton. And I highly doubt it was anywhere close to 5 mil.
 

rahu

Banned
Trump is the new Hitler and the US is a Fascist state

By Ian Greenhalgh on February 3, 2017

Trump is the new Hitler – a figurehead with a good line in charismatic public speaking, some populist rhetoric and a penchant for mistreating women. The similarities don’t end there however and the key one to draw is that both lead their countries into becoming fascist police states – already, after a couple of weeks in office Trump has threatened to crush peaceful protesters with tanks and has enacted new legislation that violates basic human rights.
Trump and Hitler were both elected into power, Hitler then used a false flag (the burning of the Reichstag) to suspend the constitution and impose a single party totalitarian dictatorship. Many are expecting a major false flag on the 9-11 scale or worse, to occur in the near future in order to empower Trump’s nefarious agenda, probably to give cassus belli for yet another war.
Already we are seeing Trump return to the Bush-era policy of using the US military as mercenaries to fight the battles of ‘allies’ like Saudi Arabia and Israel, a suitable false flag would enable Trump to repeat the Bush-era military adventurism and by suitable

rahu
 

rahu

Banned
http://www.veteranstodaynews.com/20...d-trump-appears-to-think-he-is-above-the-law/

Watergate Veterans: Just Like Nixon, Donald Trump Appears to Think He is Above the Law

Nixon & Trump
trump_nixon-800x430.jpg

By democracynow.org
On Monday night, after Trump fired acting Attorney General Sally Yates over her refusal to defend Trump’s Muslim ban, many commentators compared the incident to the infamous Saturday Night Massacre in 1973, when then-Attorney General Elliot Richardson and his deputy resigned after President Richard Nixon ordered Richardson to fire the special prosecutor investigating the Watergate scandal.
For more, we speak with two women who played key roles during the Nixon years. Elizabeth Holtzman is a former U.S. congresswoman from New York who served on the House Judiciary Committee that voted to impeach Richard Nixon. Jill Wine-Banks was an assistant Watergate special prosecutor and the first woman to serve as U.S. Army general counsel.
 

Kuntuzangmo

Well-known member
I want to know when someone will stop the flood of executive orders. Drumpf will probably keep writing 'til his hand is frozen and cramped and they'll have to wrench the pen from his stubbly little fingers.
 

ynnest

Well-known member
Trump is the new Hitler and the US is a Fascist state

By Ian Greenhalgh on February 3, 2017

Trump is the new Hitler – a figurehead with a good line in charismatic public speaking, some populist rhetoric and a penchant for mistreating women. The similarities don’t end there however and the key one to draw is that both lead their countries into becoming fascist police states – already, after a couple of weeks in office Trump has threatened to crush peaceful protesters with tanks and has enacted new legislation that violates basic human rights.
Trump and Hitler were both elected into power, Hitler then used a false flag (the burning of the Reichstag) to suspend the constitution and impose a single party totalitarian dictatorship. Many are expecting a major false flag on the 9-11 scale or worse, to occur in the near future in order to empower Trump’s nefarious agenda, probably to give cassus belli for yet another war.
Already we are seeing Trump return to the Bush-era policy of using the US military as mercenaries to fight the battles of ‘allies’ like Saudi Arabia and Israel, a suitable false flag would enable Trump to repeat the Bush-era military adventurism and by suitable

rahu


Yes, but this will not be allowed to happen again.

Those of you who have evolved your understanding to a point of understanding paradigms that takes the soul into consideration, you should now be able to make connections. What these are I will leave up to you to figure out.

Y
 

JUPITERASC

Well-known member
I want to know when someone will stop the flood of executive orders.
Drumpf will probably keep writing 'til his hand is frozen and cramped
and they'll have to wrench the pen from his stubbly little fingers.
Siriusly :smile:

Administration’s Regulatory Freeze Halts $181 Billion in Pending Rules

On day one in office, President Trump’s Chief of Staff, Reince Priebus, signed a memo
to all executive agencies imposing a regulatory moratorium.

This may sound like an extraordinary action, but President Obama’s then-Chief of Staff
Rahm Emanuel, penned an almost identical memo eight years ago
:smile:

According to American Action Forum (AAF) research
this memo put a hold on $181 billion in total regulatory costs
including $17 billion in annual costs
and 5.5 million hours of paperwork.
This moratorium freezes 22 rulemakings with annual costs above $100 million
and 16 measures with more than $1 billion in long-term costs.

 

JUPITERASC

Well-known member
Yes, but this will not be allowed to happen again.

Those of you who have evolved your understanding
to a point of understanding paradigms that takes the soul into consideration,
you should now be able to make connections.
What these are I will leave up to you to figure out.

Y
Would be useful if you would cite these 'connections' you hint at :smile:
 

Moondancing

Premium Member
I want to know when someone will stop the flood of executive orders. Drumpf will probably keep writing 'til his hand is frozen and cramped and they'll have to wrench the pen from his stubbly little fingers.

So far his EO are legal. He's not bypassing Congress or stepping on our Constitution. Some people just don't like what he's doing. Obama laid 1200 pages of new regulations on the American people on his way out the door. Are we suppose to just be quite and take it?

Moondance
 

rahu

Banned
So far his EO are legal. He's not bypassing Congress or stepping on our Constitution. Some people just don't like what he's doing. Obama laid 1200 pages of new regulations on the American people on his way out the door. Are we suppose to just be quite and take it?

Moondance


EO are legal by the constitution, it is just another hidden element that reveals we do not live in a democracy as we are programmed. the Founding Father's did not trust the plebian electorate hence the inclusion of the electoral college and Executive Orders.
rahu
 

Moondancing

Premium Member
EO are legal by the constitution, it is just another hidden element that reveals we do not live in a democracy as we are programmed. the Founding Father's did not trust the plebian electorate hence the inclusion of the electoral college and Executive Orders.
rahu

When Obama signed EO they looked legal on the surface but when taken to the Supreme Court, they were overturned. They were illegal.

Trump's EO are made to look like they are illegal but he stands on firm legal ground and no courts will be able to throw out his orders.

Moondance
 

rahu

Banned
Also to be considered is that if California is successful in pouring immigrants into the state, and those migrants stay in the state, it’s going to look increasingly less like the rest of the US than it already does.
That has obvious implications as well. And they are serious about increasing the number of migrants coming to their state, as just became clear.
Although they may not have thought through the economic impact of mass immigration into their state, it’s clear that leadership in California is intent on pursuing just that.
In fact, not only does the state have sanctuary cities, but it is being proposed to turn the entire state into a sanctuary for illegal migrants.
Reports are that, “California may prohibit local law enforcement from cooperating with federal immigration authorities, creating a border-to-border sanctuary in the nation’s largest state as legislative Democrats ramp up their efforts to battle President Donald Trump’s migration policies.”
The idea is to take the sanctuary policies of cities such as Los Angeles and San Francisco and make them effective state-wide.
And they are not wasting time: “The Democratic legislation, written by Senate President Pro Tem Kevin de Leon of Los Angeles, comes up for debate less than a week after Trump signed an order threatening to withdraw some federal grants from jurisdictions that bar officials from communicating with federal authorities about someone’s immigration status.”
Of course, this should be called precisely what it is: outright rebellion. The state is about to make a law that makes it illegal for state and local law enforcement officials to comply with federal law
 

rahu

Banned
When Obama signed EO they looked legal on the surface but when taken to the Supreme Court, they were overturned. They were illegal.

Trump's EO are made to look like they are illegal but he stands on firm legal ground and no courts will be able to throw out his orders.

Moondance

the courts just threw out his muslim ban.

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-slams-called-judge-blocked-immigration-order/story?id=45266060
President Trump reacted on Saturday to a federal judge's order temporarily blocking the executive order on immigration by attacking the judge.
"The opinion of this so-called judge, which essentially takes law-enforcement away from our country, is ridiculous and will be overturned!," the president tweeted.
His post was among a flurry of tweets pushing back on the decision Friday by U.S. District Judge James L. Robart in Seattle, Washington.
"When a country is no longer able to say who can, and who cannot, come in & out, especially for reasons of safety & security - big trouble! ... Interesting that certain Middle-Eastern countries agree with the ban. They know if certain people are allowed in it's death & destruction!," Trump posted.
rahu
 
Top