Hi Pixy,
This is the perfect opportunity to try the John Frawley technique of establishing 'Is the information true?'.
Frawley says:
We are looking here for testimonies that it is true. If we have few or none of these, it will, by default, be false. A void of course Moon indicates nothing will come of it, true or false.
To be true:
*the angles of the chart should be in fixed signs.
*Lord 1, Lord 3, the Moon and the Moon's dispositor should be in fixed signs and angular houses, or at least fixed signs and succedent houses.
Above, Frawley mentions Lord 3, in establishing whether information is true or not, but in the case of
predictions, he says:
Take the same testimonies as above, but look to the 9th house and Lord 9 instead of the 3rd house and Lord 3.
So let's have a look and see what Frawley might say according to his technique.
The angles are in mutable signs. Lord 1 is in a mutable sign. Lord 9 is in a mutable sign.
However, the Moon is in a fixed sign and a succedent house, which isn't too bad, and the Moon dispositor is fixed, but, it is cadent.
According to this method, the testimony against the prediction would seem to outweight the testimonies for it.
The best position is that of the exalted Moon, fixed and succedent. As it is in the 9th, this may represent the 'psychic'. If this is the case, then it may show that the person you consulted does have some measure of ability, the information they gave was sincere and not deliberately fraudulent. However, I'm not sure Frawley would consider this prediction to show as true. Perhaps this is because the circumstances surrounding the issue are so changeable and adaptable that this can alter the outcome, given the mutable angles and the fixed but cadent Lord 9.
Draco
