Astrologers' Community  

Go Back   Astrologers' Community > Anything Else... > Chat

Chat For posts that don't have to do with astrological chart interpretation, but they're still important to you. Gossip, show off, hot topic, spiritual thoughts, Sun sign astrological discussions, chit chat: come in and share!


Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #9326  
Unread 01-19-2020, 09:13 PM
JUPITERASC's Avatar
JUPITERASC JUPITERASC is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 53,619
Re: Random Thoughts, strictly Text

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ukpoohbear View Post

I’m glad they’re paying back the refurbishments spent on Frogmore Cottage and I’m glad they’re not able to be part-time royals like they wanted, this way whatever publicity they do is definitely their own.

The synastry between them is notoriously fraught with difficulties so I wonder what the future holds for Prince Harry if they split up, but I’m also glad he has left because it’s kind of like karma for the way they treated Princess Diana. Plus, they made him, at 12 years old, walk behind her herse on national TV because it was his duty, that would have been so damaging for a boy of his age!

But I have massive reservations about Megan. She doesn’t have the same motive as Harry. What I find interesting about the universe is we create our own universe and so all this energy surrounding her is just going to follow her wherever she goes, she’s running away from her own shadow basically.
Harry famously photographed
giving nazi salute at a party
while wearing a swastica
text only allowed on thread
so if interested
image is easily found searching online

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ukpoohbear View Post
The Queen was pictured with Prince Andrew today, showing a public display of support for a man who had been pictured with a girl who was a victim of sex trafficking.

Major mistake for the Royals. It’s her son, I get it, but they’ve been ruthless with following protocol before, so she should oust him instead of just pretending to the public he’s been stripped of his duties. He hasn’t been punished at all, he’s hiding behind the institution like a baby. More karma on its way...
Andrews older bro "aka future king"
is famed for having defended a certain Bishop Ball
and also famously
befriended Jimmy Saville
- Bishop Ball and Jimmy Saville both committed heinous crimes
as was subsequently discovered
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hkk View Post
I agree with bad karma after what they did to Princess Diana. She would have been a true queen.

The queen and her family is getting bad karma. Look at her son. She should be ashamed of him rather than walking around with him. He needs to be kicked out, arrested and put in prison.
No point in the royal family. Just a show to give England some culture which they lack if they didn’t have this clown family.
Prince Harry is doing the right thing if it is his decision. He’s in a better position than his brother who is being brainwashed and groomed. Princess Diana would have hated that but she will get justice and hopefully her sons will be in a happier place.
the word "karma" means "action"
and
actions have consequences

keep in mind that
Diana Princess of Wales died after
her HRH title was revoked by the Queen
which meant no protection from bodyguards as a consequence
and now
ironically
her son Harry has given up HRH title voluntarily
as has wife Meghan
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ukpoohbear View Post
Trump ousted the Clintons but that doesn’t make him the hero.

Trump and Meghan were both catalysts for change but that is no cause to free them from blame.

She has disrespected our culture, cried wolf and is about to make millions off the back of it. Now, she’s selfish and narcissistic, but even narcissistic people are that way because they are wounded. She is learning like we all are but I don’t like self-serving users.

Harry has clear intentions, she does not.
Seems Harry keen "to escape from being a Royal" since day one

__________________
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=82p-D...eature=related Hippocrates Let food be your medicine: let medicine be your food. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cvz9uSK3zXo Rosencrantz & Guildenstern are Dead Tom Stoppard http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KchhSIVwMdY Every exit is an entrance to somewhere else. VETTIUS VALENS FREE http://www.csus.edu/indiv/r/rileymt/...s%20entire.pdf
Reply With Quote
  #9327  
Unread 01-19-2020, 10:57 PM
passiflora's Avatar
passiflora passiflora is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 1,015
Quote:
Originally Posted by petosiris View Post
Americans discovered the concept of fake news in 2016.
For Trump’s followers that is true but Greens, Libertarians, Independents, and others conspicuously excluded from the two-party circus have been talking about it for a long time. The term recently preceding “fake news” was “fourth estate.”
Reply With Quote
  #9328  
Unread 01-19-2020, 11:42 PM
Ukpoohbear's Avatar
Ukpoohbear Ukpoohbear is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 4,328
Quote:
Originally Posted by JUPITERASC View Post
Harry famously photographed
giving nazi salute at a party
while wearing a swastica
text only allowed on thread
so if interested
image is easily found searching online
May I ask why you brought up Prince Harry’s Nazi-costume past?
Is it to show he is not exempt from criticism?

I don’t look up to him at all because he hasn’t exactly had to fight for anything in his life. His perspective is coming from within a life of extreme privilege and respect, which he didn’t have to earn. On a soul level, he will be a baby and personally quite immature. I do like he is protective of his Mum and that tragedy has taught him to question the establishment but plenty of children lose parents, are abandoned by the other parent and subsequently subjected to a life of abuse and poverty - no £2million pocket money, loving father and respect from everyone in sight. So he’s not exactly a hero and if I met him I would probably think he was extremely ignorant.

Quote:
Originally Posted by JUPITERASC View Post
keep in mind that
Diana Princess of Wales died after
her HRH title was revoked by the Queen
which meant no protection from bodyguards as a consequence
and now
ironically
her son Harry has given up HRH title voluntarily
as has wife Meghan

Seems Harry keen "to escape from being a Royal" since day one
The statement from the Queen which said they will no longer use their royal titles was misleading. Although PH&MM will no longer use them, they have not been stripped of them legally. Maybe it’s a technicality so they can keep receiving funding for their security.

Last edited by Ukpoohbear; 01-19-2020 at 11:44 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #9329  
Unread 01-20-2020, 03:43 AM
passiflora's Avatar
passiflora passiflora is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 1,015
I am not enthusiastic about American football, as established, but there was an impressive amount of Scorpio quarterback energy tonight.
https://www.astrotheme.com/astrology/Jimmy_Garoppolo
https://www.astro.com/astro-databank/Rodgers,_Aaron super bright guy, and Mars in Libra.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to passiflora For This Useful Post:
david starling (01-20-2020)
  #9330  
Unread 01-20-2020, 09:07 AM
david starling david starling is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Yes
Posts: 20,750
Smile Re: Random Thoughts, strictly Text

Sun will ingress tropical Aquarius in 6 hrs.



Reply With Quote
  #9331  
Unread 01-20-2020, 03:21 PM
petosiris's Avatar
petosiris petosiris is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 3,390
Re: Random Thoughts, strictly Text

Quote:
Originally Posted by david starling View Post
Sun will ingress tropical Aquarius in 6 hrs.



The age of detriment is about to begin.
Reply With Quote
  #9332  
Unread 01-20-2020, 04:06 PM
david starling david starling is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Yes
Posts: 20,750
Smile Re: Random Thoughts, strictly Text

Quote:
Originally Posted by petosiris View Post
The age of detriment is about to begin.
Denying Uranian rulership of Aquarius is anti-Aquarian Age.

Also, as I'm sure you know, each indicator has its own version of an "afflicted" placement. The Age-indicator isn't in "detriment" in Aquarius.

Anything to say about the current Moon/Mars conjunction in tropical Sagittarius?
Reply With Quote
  #9333  
Unread 01-20-2020, 04:35 PM
david starling david starling is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Yes
Posts: 20,750
Smile Re: Random Thoughts, strictly Text

Nothing "wrong" about being anti-Aquarian Age. The Age-effect varies from one Natal-chart to another. It's not lock-step. Our current Saturnian Reality-paradigm is transitioning into a Uranian version of Reality, and many are bound to prefer the Saturnian version we already have.

True prophecies come true on their own. Trying to make a prophecy come true slows it down. Trying to prevent it, speeds it up. Being anti-Aquarian Age may be a way of encouraging the transition into the Age itself--the power of negative-thinking.

Last edited by david starling; 01-20-2020 at 05:09 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #9334  
Unread 01-20-2020, 05:29 PM
petosiris's Avatar
petosiris petosiris is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 3,390
Re: Random Thoughts, strictly Text

Quote:
Originally Posted by david starling View Post
Nothing "wrong" about being anti-Aquarian Age. The Age-effect varies from one Natal-chart to another. It's not lock-step. Our current Saturnian Reality-paradigm is transitioning into a Uranian version of Reality, and many are bound to prefer the Saturnian version we already have.

True prophecies come true on their own. Trying to make a prophecy come true slows it down. Trying to prevent it, speeds it up. Being anti-Aquarian Age may be a way of encouraging the transition into the Age itself--the power of negative-thinking.
Some prophecies are conditional like - Matthew 23:39
Reply With Quote
  #9335  
Unread 01-20-2020, 05:53 PM
david starling david starling is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Yes
Posts: 20,750
Smile Re: Random Thoughts, strictly Text

The prophecy of a new and better Aquarian Age world doesn't require belief.
Reply With Quote
  #9336  
Unread 01-20-2020, 06:03 PM
petosiris's Avatar
petosiris petosiris is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 3,390
Re: Random Thoughts, strictly Text

Quote:
Originally Posted by david starling View Post
The prophecy of a new and better Aquarian Age world doesn't require belief.
How do you imagine lions becoming vegetarian without any supernatural intervention?
Reply With Quote
  #9337  
Unread 01-20-2020, 08:56 PM
david starling david starling is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Yes
Posts: 20,750
Smile Re: Random Thoughts, strictly Text

Quote:
Originally Posted by petosiris View Post
How do you imagine lions becoming vegetarian without any supernatural intervention?
"Supernatural" is anything inexplicable to modern-day, materialistic science.
Reply With Quote
  #9338  
Unread 01-20-2020, 09:01 PM
petosiris's Avatar
petosiris petosiris is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 3,390
Re: Random Thoughts, strictly Text

Quote:
Originally Posted by david starling View Post
"Supernatural" is anything inexplicable to modern-day, materialistic science.
I am using in the term for something that does not belong to common sense, which uhm, well nevermind.
Reply With Quote
  #9339  
Unread 01-20-2020, 09:26 PM
passiflora's Avatar
passiflora passiflora is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 1,015
Do lions like Beyond Meat? (It is a meat substitute made from, among other things, protein extracted from peas) Almost a sad thought.
Reply With Quote
  #9340  
Unread 01-20-2020, 09:30 PM
petosiris's Avatar
petosiris petosiris is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 3,390
Re: Random Thoughts, strictly Text

Quote:
Originally Posted by passiflora View Post
Do lions like Beyond Meat? (It is a meat substitute made from, among other things, protein extracted from peas) Almost a sad thought.
Will it be enough to feed all carnivores?
Reply With Quote
  #9341  
Unread 01-20-2020, 09:50 PM
david starling david starling is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Yes
Posts: 20,750
Smile Re: Random Thoughts, strictly Text

Quote:
Originally Posted by passiflora View Post
Do lions like Beyond Meat? (It is a meat substitute made from, among other things, protein extracted from peas) Almost a sad thought.
No, but they can't believe it's not butter!
Reply With Quote
  #9342  
Unread 01-20-2020, 09:54 PM
petosiris's Avatar
petosiris petosiris is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 3,390
Re: Random Thoughts, strictly Text

Quote:
Originally Posted by david starling View Post
No, but they can't believe it's not butter!
The prophet Isaiah says that lion ''will eat straw like the ox''! (Is. 11:7)
Reply With Quote
  #9343  
Unread 01-20-2020, 09:56 PM
david starling david starling is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Yes
Posts: 20,750
Smile Re: Random Thoughts, strictly Text

Benevolution, instead of Evilution.
Reply With Quote
  #9344  
Unread 01-20-2020, 10:01 PM
petosiris's Avatar
petosiris petosiris is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 3,390
Re: Random Thoughts, strictly Text

Quote:
Originally Posted by david starling View Post
Benevolution, instead of Evilution.
Didn't you believe in the estimated age of the Earth containing millions of years of fossil record with pain, death, killing, disease, thorns, struggle, suffering and extinction by said materialistic science?
Reply With Quote
  #9345  
Unread 01-20-2020, 10:25 PM
david starling david starling is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Yes
Posts: 20,750
Smile Re: Random Thoughts, strictly Text

Quote:
Originally Posted by petosiris View Post
Didn't you believe in the estimated age of the Earth containing millions of years of fossil record with pain, death, killing, disease, thorns, struggle, suffering and extinction by said materialistic science?
Darwinian Evolution is manifestly a Saturnian-influenced doctrine.
Reply With Quote
  #9346  
Unread 01-20-2020, 10:54 PM
petosiris's Avatar
petosiris petosiris is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 3,390
Re: Random Thoughts, strictly Text

Quote:
Originally Posted by david starling View Post
Darwinian Evolution is manifestly a Saturnian-influenced doctrine.
Meaning???
Reply With Quote
  #9347  
Unread 01-20-2020, 11:00 PM
david starling david starling is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Yes
Posts: 20,750
Smile Re: Random Thoughts, strictly Text

Quote:
Originally Posted by petosiris View Post
Meaning???
Survival of the Fittest.
Reply With Quote
  #9348  
Unread 01-20-2020, 11:14 PM
petosiris's Avatar
petosiris petosiris is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 3,390
Re: Random Thoughts, strictly Text

Quote:
Originally Posted by david starling View Post
Survival of the Fittest.
If by that you mean natural selection, then unlike the purported age of the Earth, this is an easily demonstrable theory. Natural selection does not equal Darwinian evolution, it was noted by philosophers and creationists before Darwin.

''Blyth, however, differed from Darwin in his starting assumptions. Blyth believed in God as the Creator, rather than the blind forces of nature. He believed that God created original kinds, that all modern species descended from those kinds, and that natural selection acted by conserving rather than originating. Blyth also believed that man was a separate creation from animals. This is especially important since humans are made in the image of God, an attribute that cannot be applied to animals (Genesis 1:27). Blyth seemed to view natural selection as a mechanism designed directly or indirectly by God to allow His creation to survive in a post-Fall, post-Flood world. This is very different from Darwin’s view. Darwin wrote, “What a book a devil’s chaplain might write on the clumsy, wasteful, blundering low and horridly cruel works of nature.'' - https://answersingenesis.org/natural...-as-evolution/
Reply With Quote
  #9349  
Unread 01-20-2020, 11:22 PM
david starling david starling is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Yes
Posts: 20,750
Smile Re: Random Thoughts, strictly Text

Quote:
Originally Posted by petosiris View Post
If by that you mean natural selection, then unlike the purported age of the Earth, this is an easily demonstrable theory. Natural selection does not equal Darwinian evolution, it was noted by philosophers and creationists before Darwin.

''Blyth, however, differed from Darwin in his starting assumptions. Blyth believed in God as the Creator, rather than the blind forces of nature. He believed that God created original kinds, that all modern species descended from those kinds, and that natural selection acted by conserving rather than originating. Blyth also believed that man was a separate creation from animals. This is especially important since humans are made in the image of God, an attribute that cannot be applied to animals (Genesis 1:27). Blyth seemed to view natural selection as a mechanism designed directly or indirectly by God to allow His creation to survive in a post-Fall, post-Flood world. This is very different from Darwin’s view. Darwin wrote, “What a book a devil’s chaplain might write on the clumsy, wasteful, blundering low and horridly cruel works of nature.'' - https://answersingenesis.org/natural...-as-evolution/
God is invisible. An image of God is an idol, and idolatry is forbidden, according to the Bible. Envisioning the human form as an image of God is idolatry.
Reply With Quote
  #9350  
Unread 01-20-2020, 11:35 PM
petosiris's Avatar
petosiris petosiris is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 3,390
Re: Random Thoughts, strictly Text

Quote:
Originally Posted by david starling View Post
God is invisible. An image of God is an idol, and idolatry is forbidden, according to the Bible. Envisioning the human form as an image of God is idolatry.
Jesus Christ is said to be image of the invisible God. (Col. 1:15) Adam and Eve were created in the image of God (Gen. 1:27). Unlike in idolatrous religions, images are not manifestations of God, but representations. This is common sense - a picture or a painting of yourself is not you, though it is something like you and is able to represent you.

ὅμοιος (Col. 1:15) not ὁμοούσιος (?)

Last edited by petosiris; 01-20-2020 at 11:40 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT. The time now is 06:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2005-2018, AstrologyWeekly.com. Boards' structure and all posts are property of AstrologyWeekly.com and their respective creators. No part of the messages sent on these boards may be copied without their owners' explicit consent.