It is unreal that even the poll is 50/50. I guess this is adding to the confusion as well.
The poll has now changed to 6/8 in favor of Aries.
There is a real possibility that your ascendant is one of those 29 59 or 0 01 type ones.
Yes, indeed. I do not believe I mentioned this earlier, so I will mention it now; I have a birth certificate with a recorded time of birth that does not appear to be rounded to the nearest hour. This birth time gives me an Ascendant of
1 Aries 10. However, I soon realized that
a three-minute hesitation of recording my time of birth would result in a late Pisces Ascendant. I believe this is entirely feasible.
If you really dont know anymore, why not ask a horary question. "Is my Ascendant Pisces". A yes or no would do it then. Only question is the house determination. Do we take the Asc. of the question as being "the asc." and the Moon as being "you" and see if there is a connection between them?
We could also look for aspects between you and/or the Moon as Asc. ruler and Jupiter (for Pisces) and Mars (for Aries). Maybe this could bring you closer.
I tried this upon another member's suggestion a few years ago; you may wish to revisit the thread
Do I Have a Pisces Ascendant?.
Pisces AC IS somehow enigmatic and dreamy. It is just obvious. And the mouth must be somehow curved.
The reason I am posting is that I am fire / water myself and with Pisces AC so, take a look...
These two pictures look very, very different from each other--and I simply do not see the Pisces influence in the second picture you posted, although it is definitely present in the first.
I think you look a lot like the first woman, which you can see better side by side. I think her eyebrows do look like yours (but she paints hers in to look higher to de-emphasize her heavy lids), yours are a bit softer.
As I mentioned earlier,
this is not the natural shape of my eyebrows. Perhaps I can find a picture of myself before I began shaping them; left unattended, my eyebrows are thick and virtually flat.
There are a lot of similarities, from the type of hair (though hers is darker), the whole eye area and look in the eyes, the nose, the chin, the mouth, even the smile.
I can appreciate some of these similarities, although I wish to emphasize that
I straighten my hair every day; perhaps this is the source of the crispness you later describe. As you can see from the pictures I've posted, even a good hair straightener cannot remove all of the waves from my hair. In this regard, perhaps my hair does resemble that of the first woman--although I imagine that if I cut it this short, it would be unruly.
You have the same eyes and expression as the second woman, especially if you imagine her with less protrusion of the nose between the eyes. There is the same smile and alertness. Your eyebrows are softer, hers are quite firm looking.
Thank you for pointing out these similarities; I suppose the protrusion of the nose prevented me from seeing some of the traits you described.
Your hair still is strawberry blonde IMO, it has that reddish tone to it and that martian crispyness to it, typically around the edges. Platinum blonde is very cool, cold and white, which yours is not, although it is possible that when you get natural highlights from the sun, the hair streaks will be platinum where the red has faded out.
My hair is certainly no longer platinum blonde; I was describing my hair when I was a very young child in an earlier post. And yes, I agree my hair still contains reddish highlights, although the effect is subtle.
Those people with the Pisces rising pictures do look like they are Pisces rising, look at those expressive, soft eyes of Natasa, same with the others.
But you do not look dreamy and far away. Rather, you look bright and alert and wide awake. Your eyes say "hello, I am the very first light"!
I agree, but couldn't this be the influence of natal Sun, Moon, Mercury, Venus in Aries in the first house? As another member previously stated, it's hard to miss that stellium.
Thank you, everyone, for your contributions!
Arian Maverick