Osamenor, there is a truism in modern astrology of the more spiritual variety, that we cannot really tell from looking at a "blind" chart of the moment of a person's birth whether they will live it out in a more crass material way or in a more "evolved" way, or somewhere in between.
When I first saw HRC's chart, I was shocked at those hard Leo-Scorpio squares. Had I not known this was her chart, I would have thought that such a woman would have enormous, debilitating psychological stress in her life. These squares remain independently of her birth time; but if it is 8:02 am, as many of us believe, then her Scorpio ascendant is in the mix, as well.
Yet a couple of times when I read charts for older people with big Mars squares and suggested they had strong tempers, they responded with, "I used to be that way when I was young, but I had to learn at a young age to control my temper." Clinton's self-control is legendary-- and the alt-right attacks to the contrary have been factually discredited.
Regardless of what people think of Clinton as a human being or candidate, I would place her at the mixed or more evolved end of the spectrum of lower-order to higher-order chart manifestation, in part because her chart is so difficult to begin with. She's also faced harsh media scrutiny her entire adult life.
Clinton was raised a Methodist, and remains active in her faith-- something she doesn't publicize. I think this gives her some emotional advantages to weather the difficult transits. When she quoted the following attributed to John Wesley, her chart fell into place for me better:
"Do all the good you can, by all the means you can, in all the ways you can, in all the places you can, at all the times you can, to all the people you can, as long as ever you can"
For people who doubt that she's done so, I point to this article about the various honours and awards she's received during her lifetime:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_awards_and_honors_received_by_Hillary_Clinton
This doesn't mean people have to vote for her, but it is a way of looking at her horoscope beyond the alt-right trash-talk about Clinton.
Donald Trump, in contrast, has an easier-looking chart; but people who have studied him or know him personally have commented that he's never really had to deal seriously with any kind of authority-- other than his late father's or his own. It seems very important for Trump to be "king of the mountain"-- always the most alpha of the alpha males. He loves the role of the tycoon surrounded by sycophants whom he can order around and fire at will. He was born into a very wealthy family and has remained in that stratum of society.
Despite some financial reversals in his past, I don't think anyone, even his staunch supporters, would place Trump high on the spiritual "evolution" scale.
Consequently, if someone lives his horoscope through the more material manifestations, I think he's more likely to get blindsided by hard transits. He's not had to build up a repertory of temperate emotional and verbal responses to press criticism, because he was so used to lackeys falling into place around him.
With his natal sun-Uranus NN opposite moon-SN, when Trump feels challenged, he reverts back into his "hit them back harder" trope; which might have worked OK for him as a real estate developer. But it doesn't help him with a critical press, Democrats, or sectors of the public.
Uranus-Eris finally caught up with Trump's Saturn-Venus. (Venus ruling women.)
For some Republicans who held their noses to support Trump, they reached a tipping point. So we might also consider what is going on with the country more generally.