Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez

[rahu]

ii have started wondering why Alexandria was become suh a darling of the media and the democrats. why is anyone even paying attention to what she says. nothing she has proposed is new .the ideas she has espoused have been around for 10 years. and then recently her campaign manager has allegedly been found to hiding money which is illegal and could be charged. how could she be so .....stupid, how could she come from nowhere....it has been reported that she never lived at the address she gave as her primary residence but lived in the suburbs. none of the residents around her new York address have ever seen her. and when reported questioned her about this, she said she had to go inside and then left by the back door... it takes money....whose money is she using?
it turns out the money is partly from her "manager"
I have long stated there is no left and right and that the Rothschild are behind creating economic slavery. George soros who is supposed to be a leftwing billionaire is actually a cony of the Rothschild's.

if you have enough time you might look at these videos. they both basically tell the same story about Alexandria and the other actors around her. yes... it turns out she went to a "audition" call by a political group that wanted to fund candidates for congress.. and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez was one of the winners... another winner was ilhan omar... what a coincidences. evidence alledge;y shows omar to have married her brother..... how could she think dshe could run for office with this colossal skeleton in her closet..if it is true? seems omar also answered the same audition call as Alexandria

https://beforeitsnews.com/v3/u-s-pol...9/2571995.html
The Brains Behind @AOC (Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez) - Eye-Opening Must Watch Video
https://youtu.be/1h5iv6sECGU

Alexandria isn’t really a politician, she’s an actress playing a role. In fact, she is just a puppet being controlled. “Mr. Reagan” breaks it down.

https://beforeitsnews.com/v3/opinion...9/3438596.html
What AOC Doesn’t Want You to Know
https://youtu.be/ydjccNUXUNw

For more about Saikat Chakrabarti and the rest of string-pullers controlling AOC, refer to Mr Reagan’s exposé.(above video rahu)

[ElenaJ]

Interesting, isn't it. Here is her chart.

[david starling]

Very feisty!

[ElenaJ]

Very.
So why now? Here is the progressed chart, with transits.
Note the moon/mars opposition, sitting on the transiting Uranus, on the MH/IC axis.
And the progressed Pluto/sun/mercury conjunction in fierce determined scorpio. Power, revolution and communication.
North node on the 2nd cusp bringing her wealth and reinforcing her sense of self-value.
Progressed Jupiter conjunct Chiron on the 7th cusp, Jupiter rules the 12th.
The transiting Saturn/pluto conjunct ascendent giving her courage, charisma, and the will to revolutionise.

[AppLeo]

Democrats love her because she's a moronic socialist and a woman of color.

[ElenaJ]

I think she's starting to scare them! She's completely taken over control. They've been too busy looking the other way at how to undermine Trump, and she just walked into the vacuum.

[waybread]

Is that a correct birth time, or a noon default birth time? We cannot use the houses if it's the latter, and then the moon could move 6 degrees either way.

She's a media darling because she's photogenic, energetic, and says smart funny things; often in rebuttal to right-wingnut trolls and stodgy Republicans trying to take her down.

She's part of a larger movement of younger, progressive Democrats who put themselves on the line to stand up to Donald Trump, so she's not unique. Like some of her other fellow first-time representatives, she's a bit inexperienced, and perhaps naive.

Yes, feisty indeed with that grand cross--

but don't forget that her congressional district voted for her.

Rahu, if we could stay on-topc and not have to deal with your bizarre conspiracy theories anti-Semitic complaints about wealthy Jews, that would help us to focus.

[rahu]

waybread you haven't changed after 15 years, still espousing the new world orders agenda. and you still use the same old psych-op passive-aggressive techniques because you can't rebut the facts of the nature of the economic/political realities. you haven't changed....could you explain how kerosene can melt steel girders again?
I know you always have to get the last word so don't bother direct any "rebuttal" toward me .your back on may ignore list and just showed why you've there.

aloha
rahu

[rahu]

Originally Posted by ElenaJ

I think she's starting to scare them! She's completely taken over control. They've been too busy looking the other way at how to undermine Trump, and she just walked into the vacuum.

apparently you didn't bother to look at the videos, she controls nothing ,she is an actor and everything is scripted.
the illusion of the political left and right is characterizes best by nancy Pelosi"s refusal to indict trump for impeachment.....no one in the imaginary left or right cares....installing a fascist government is all that is happening.one must consider that fascist dictatorships have always been controlled by the corporations. hitler Mussolini ,franco etc. fascism is not a political system ,it is a economic system. and trump has made the control of this society by the corporation undeniable.
rahu

[AppLeo]

Originally Posted by waybread

Is that a correct birth time, or a noon default birth time? We cannot use the houses if it's the latter, and then the moon could move 6 degrees either way.

She's a media darling because she's photogenic, energetic, and says smart funny things; often in rebuttal to right-wingnut trolls and stodgy Republicans trying to take her down.

She's part of a larger movement of younger, progressive Democrats who put themselves on the line to stand up to Donald Trump, so she's not unique. Like some of her other fellow first-time representatives, she's a bit inexperienced, and perhaps naive.

Yes, feisty indeed with that grand cross--

but don't forget that her congressional district voted for her.

Rahu, if we could stay on-topc and not have to deal with your bizarre conspiracy theories anti-Semitic complaints about wealthy Jews, that would help us to focus.

Originally Posted by rahu

waybread you haven't changed after 15 years, still espousing the new world orders agenda. and you still use the same old psych-op passive-aggressive techniques because you can't rebut the facts of the nature of the economic/political realities. you haven't changed....could you explain how kerosene can melt steel girders again?
I know you always have to get the last word so don't bother direct any "rebuttal" toward me .your back on may ignore list and just showed why you've there.

aloha
rahu

ahahahahah

[Oddity]

Catch up with Isaac Bonewits - he spoke with her and got her birth time. If I catch up to him I'll ask.

Meanwhile, my selfie (especially for Rahu)

[greybeard]

Originally Posted by waybread

Is that a correct birth time, or a noon default birth time? We cannot use the houses if it's the latter, and then the moon could move 6 degrees either way.

She's a media darling because she's photogenic, energetic, and says smart funny things; often in rebuttal to right-wingnut trolls and stodgy Republicans trying to take her down.

She's part of a larger movement of younger, progressive Democrats who put themselves on the line to stand up to Donald Trump, so she's not unique. Like some of her other fellow first-time representatives, she's a bit inexperienced, and perhaps naive.

Yes, feisty indeed with that grand cross--

but don't forget that her congressional district voted for her.

Rahu, if we could stay on-topc and not have to deal with your bizarre conspiracy theories anti-Semitic complaints about wealthy Jews, that would help us to focus.

The chart is rated Rodden A, "from memory".

Exceptional chart.
8 cardinal, all angular.
Action to influence current events.
Born to deal with crises.

[greybeard]

Originally Posted by greybeard

The chart is rated Rodden A, "from memory".

Exceptional chart.
8 cardinal, all angular.
Action to influence current events.
Born to deal with crises.

Heavy preponderance of squares.

[Cold Fusion]

Originally Posted by AppLeo

Democrats love her because she's a moronic socialist and a woman of color.

That is a rather superficial blanket statement don't you think?

[AppLeo]

Originally Posted by Cold Fusion

That is a rather superficial blanket statement don't you think?

Not really...

[waybread]

Oddity, who's Isaac Bonewits?

Incidentally, I had no idea what the new world order meant until rahu accused me of being part of it. This is hard to fathom, because I live a very retiring retirement in a fairly remote part of the Canadian Rockies. Where my power to effect any new world order could come from, I can't imagine.

I do recognize antisemitism when I see it, however.

Cold Fusion, calling someone a "moronic socialist" is App Leo's notion of intellectual discussion.

[AppLeo]

Originally Posted by waybread

Oddity, who's Isaac Bonewits?

Incidentally, I had no idea what the new world order meant until rahu accused me of being part of it. This is hard to fathom, because I live a very retiring retirement in a fairly remote part of the Canadian Rockies. Where my power to effect any new world order could come from, I can't imagine.

I do recognize antisemitism when I see it, however.

Cold Fusion, calling someone a "moronic socialist" is App Leo's notion of intellectual discussion.

Actually, it's calling people exactly what they are.

[david starling]

Originally Posted by AppLeo

Actually, it's calling people exactly what they are.

Actually, it's moronically incorrect.
You still haven't realized the difference between Safety-net Capitalism and Socialism. You say "no taxation because it's stealing", and also say, "well, if taxation benefits me, personally, for infrastructure, courts, police, fire department, and the military, then it's not stealing". Just to let you know, Socialism is against private property, but Safety-net Capitalism is not. And, Socialism doesn't work, but Safety-net Capitalism does.

[Dirius]

Well she is clearly quite dumb. Its quite apparent from the way she speaks and handles herself in almost every interview she has done, which by the way have always been with supporters, never with someone that would challenge her views. She has never actually explained any of her ideas about the economy, she just spouses some socialist rhetoric before she changes the subject.

She got voted in because she can connect with the younger/female audience.

[david starling]

Originally Posted by Dirius

Well she is clearly quite dumb. Its quite apparent from the way she speaks and handles herself in almost every interview she has done, which by the way have always been with supporters, never with someone that would challenge her views. She has never actually explained any of her ideas about the economy, she just spouses some socialist rhetoric before she changes the subject.

She got voted in because she can connect with the younger/female audience.

Just a few minutes ago, I suddenly realized I had dailed up Dirius with my last post! And there he was!

[Dirius]

Originally Posted by david starling

Just a few minutes ago, I suddenly realized I had dailed up Dirius with my last post! And there he was!

[ElenaJ]

"She got voted in because she can connect with the younger/female audience."
She was voted in by about 14,000 voters in a democratic-majority district where in reality she couldn't have legally presented herself as a candidate, because she isn't resident. She just had a false residency, it's a mail drop.

[Dirius]

Originally Posted by ElenaJ

"She got voted in because she can connect with the younger/female audience."
She was voted in by about 14,000 voters in a democratic-majority district where in reality she couldn't have legally presented herself as a candidate, because she isn't resident. She just had a false residency, it's a mail drop.

Well she was registered in that district since 2012. It is hard to say whether she did commit fraud on that account, but people still had to cast a vote for her in the internal race to be the actual candidate of the party for that district, which she won.

[ElenaJ]

Yes, I was referring to the primary, where she won by less than 2% of the total voter count in the district, which is majority hispanic, not really winning over the younger/female voters.
She won the general election in November with a total of 110,000 votes.
This is far from a mandate to represent millions of Americans.
At her official residence, no one has ever seen her, and the condo belongs to her mother. It's a mail drop.

[david starling]

She doesn't represent millions of Americans. Just her district.