Orb-influence

JUPITERASC

Well-known member
Your posts are catalytic, even if I don't agree with your entire system(s).
And, they're always well thought-out and thought-provoking.
such as for example the following link :smile:
The only system in existence that can explain the continuum is the traditional one
- https://www.astrologyweekly.com/forum/showthread.php?t=130894
You may note how it factors for not only the blendings at the cusps,
but also the configurations between all signs
- heat opposing cold, moisture opposing dryness, north opposing south, east opposing west,
the support of the triangles, the admixture of different powers and rulers and so on. :smile:
 

JUPITERASC

Well-known member
Oh, thank you JA, that is so kind of you :smile:
no problem at all

nevertheless
be aware that
the link comprises more than two sentences
for those ok with several sentences
then
to verify
anyone interested may check for themselves
at https://www.astrologyweekly.com/forum/showthread.php?t=130894
Well, you have to expect a Modernistic astrologer
to disagree with leaving out the "invisibles".
clearly
- although preferably would be more useful if
you are able to explain that one sentence more succinctly :smile:
You're hooked on 7/12, and
I've even moved past the 10/12 most modern-day astrologers are using.
you're a fish out of water - apparently born too soon for even the modernists
But, a lot of what you post is food for thought, and
I'm always ready to reexamine
things I've inadvertently taken for granted.
Can't change EVERYTHING, though.
cheer up

everything is transient
 

petosiris

Banned
Well, you have to expect a Modernistic astrologer to disagree with leaving out the "invisibles". You're hooked on 7/12, and I've even moved past the 10/12 most modern-day astrologers are using. But, a lot of what you post is food for thought, and I'm always ready to reexamine things I've inadvertently taken for granted. Can't change EVERYTHING, though.

Do you call the systems 7/12 and 10/12 because there are 7 and 10 house rulers respectively? I use the Ptolemaic system which has multiple rulers for each sign, not just house rulers, but also exaltation and triplicity ones.
 

david starling

Well-known member
no problem at all

nevertheless
be aware that
the link comprises more than two sentences
for those ok with several sentences
then
to verify
anyone interested may check for themselves
at https://www.astrologyweekly.com/forum/showthread.php?t=130894

clearly
- although preferably would be more useful if
you are able to explain that one sentence more succinctly :smile:

you're a fish out of water - apparently born too soon for even the modernists
cheer up

everything is transient

So many Air-sign placements, the fun imagery makes me a "flying fish". :lol:
 

petosiris

Banned
I describe the Signs in this order:

Element and Modality
Number, beginning with Aries as the 1st Sign
Imagery last, since it has varied so much from Babylonian to Greco-Roman. It is the most fun, though. :biggrin:

Also, I don't use "masculine and feminine", I use "assertive and receptive" regarding Modality.

You are politically correct. :smile:
 

petosiris

Banned
This thread shows an utter disregard for geometry and the polarity of adjacent signs. Something either is the first masculine sign of spring or the last feminine sign of winter, easily demarcated by the marker of the equinox that nature has put there. And no thinking astrologer has ever thought of this ridiculous notion of creating own markers for thousands of years!
 

david starling

Well-known member
This thread shows an utter disregard for geometry and the polarity of adjacent signs. Something either is the first masculine sign of spring or the last feminine sign of winter, easily demarcated by the marker of the equinox that nature has put there. And no thinking astrologer has ever thought of this ridiculous notion of creating own markers for thousands of years!

This post ^ shows an udder disregard for the concept of Orb-activation, and is a MOO.

[IMO]
 

david starling

Well-known member
When you realise you are a city boy by not knowing the word for udder even when translated in your native language - mind blown! :lol:

Cows say "moo", as it sounds to humans, and cows have "udders". That's in American English. To what native language are you referring?

Maybe I should have written "udder-ly" instead of udderly , to clarify the pun. :biggrin:
 
Last edited:

JUPITERASC

Well-known member
This post ^ shows an udder disregard for
the concept of Orb-activation,
and is a MOO.
[IMO]
• MOO: Matter OF Opinion
• IMO: In My Opinion
• "udderly": a pun related to cows, and a play on the word "utterly".
:biggrin:
When you realise you are a city boy by not knowing the word for udder

even when translated in your native language - mind blown! :lol:

Re-speckt matters.
Siriusly :smile:

MOO = Mode Of Operation
IMO = In Memory Of
"udderly" is related to the word UDDER
the mammary gland of female cattle, sheep, goats, horses
and related animals, having two or more teats
hanging between the hind legs of the animal
Cows say "moo", as it sounds to humans, and cows have "udders".

That's in American English.

To what native language are you referring?
Maybe I should have written "udder-ly" instead of udderly ,

to clarify the pun. :biggrin:
an illustration would suffice irrespective of language :smile:
 

david starling

Well-known member
Siriusly :smile:

MOO = Mode Of Operation
IMO = In Memory Of
"udderly" is related to the word UDDER
the mammary gland of female cattle, sheep, goats, horses
and related animals, having two or more teats
hanging between the hind legs of the animal
an illustration would suffice irrespective of language :smile:

An illustration of an udder? :lol:
 
Top