Random Thoughts, strictly Text

Opal

Opal

Premium Member
petosiris said:
I acknowledge the observable and known outer planets as astrological factors, just not for the Earth due to their size and distance from here.
Click to expand...

But, Uranus is Earth's wife. It is difficult to disregard, such a close intimate relationship. I will try to disregard the last part.
 
Opal

Opal

Premium Member
david starling said:
Actually, there is one greatly important astrological indicator, one that can't be seen directly, in the physical sense, that is accorded great significance by Traditionalists: The Ascendant in particular, but the other Angles also, which must be calculated rather than seen in the form of "lights".
Click to expand...

Good point
 
Lykanized

Lykanized

Well-known member
conspiracy theorist said:
What's wrong with jerking in circles? Aquarius is all about brotherly love.
Click to expand...
dicks


also, how come one minute Aquarians are all like, "I'm weird, I'm a weirdo, you see this hat I never take off? It's cuz I'm a genius with only original thoughts" and the next they're like "we're all about the collective and humanity and whatever the **** brotherly love"?
 
Y

ynnest

Well-known member
Lykanized said:
Most often this thread just seems like an ""intellectual"" circle jerk, or often masturbatory
I know men do love that kinda **** for ego purposes
Click to expand...

You are partly projecting a female fantasy onto men, in my own opinion :smile:. I am not saying that you have it but this is often something that women do who have a condition that I call "small dick syndrom", a condition that also men can have, in which women and mens denial about the importance/truth of size makes women and men wildly project their unsatisfaction/pain/shortcomings on others instead of owning up to the truth and making something constructive about it.

That denial/disease is from my perspective not just destructive for the holder of the denial and a recipe for failure, it is also from my understanding this inferiority complex combined with destructive free will choices that are some of the driving factors behind all wars and evil as we know of.


Y
 
Opal

Opal

Premium Member
passiflora said:
Perhaps it was going a bit overboard to call bonding on arcane topics a circle jerk, considering arcane topics were established as the only potential point of positive connection.

Nausea is an inherent condition, by the way.
Click to expand...

I would be in agreement with you Passiflora. I have used a sexist slur here. I apologize to the men. I don't appreciate them used with me, nor do I think that I should categorically use them. Respect for all. I do not find intellectual conversation threatening. I find it interesting. I am here to have conversations that exercise my mind. Hopefully back to mentally stimulating conversation for all.
 
Opal

Opal

Premium Member
Gemini888 said:
So to go back to mental stimulating conversation...

Does anyone know where David went to, or whether he has finished his resolution?
Click to expand...

I have, what's your problem? The quote is mentally stimulating though. It must be a description of your own mindset.
 
Last edited:
Gemini888

Gemini888

Well-known member
Opal said:
I have, what's your problem? The quote is mentally stimulating though. It must be a description of your own mindset.
Click to expand...
Sorry, just a humorous attempt to lead the conversation away from the last argument. I think I may have misunderstood you somewhere.


And btw I'm not sure what you mean by "misquoting". All I did was take your response and crop out the part leading to the "mental stimulating" without any further edit. If by any way this is "misquoting" by your definition, then you have my sincere apology.


passiflora said:
Gem - thesis done?
Click to expand...
Not yet, though I'd say I'm almost done with analyzing my data. So far it has been a wild ride.


I have been reading through the guy's answers to "fan mails" (pretty sure they were trolls in disguise). So say someone asks him "What kind of music do you usually listen to? And do you use music to aid your creativity like many artists do?" you would see something like this from him "Yes. No". IDK if he was being lazy or not. The point is that he didn't read between the line and he didn't bother to separate two answers. This threw me off the first time I saw it because I couldn't understand what he was saying. It became a big pattern in his writing and at one point people questioned him if he was intentionally ignoring fans. He started to add more "emotion" in his later mails, and most of the time it was because he was arguing about women, homosexuality and video games.



The most interesting conversation so far is between him and a fan called "Jeffrey Dahmer". Jef wanted some help with his messy house. At one point he said his fridge was so stuffed he was afraid to open it. Pretty sure this was a bait for reaction because everyone knows what's in the real Dahmer's fridge. The autistic guy then told Jef to overcome his fear and open the fridge. The autistic guy didn't usually show concern for people like that, but at the same time he could be oblivious to the fridge hint (he's pretty sheltered as far as I know). So I'm really confused right now, I don't know if I should classify this as the guy failing to read between the line, or a step up from his usual speech pattern :lol::tongue:
 
Top