He hasn't "overcome" them. He has to live with them.
Hi david starling,
I'm guessing he sleeps quite well at night.
Trumpeached is one of ONLY THREE Presidents to be forevermore Impeached.
Trump was impeached only in a pathetic attempt to stop an investigation into Democratic shenanigans in Ukraine, which are many, starting with the illegal overthrown of the Ukrainian government by the Obama Administration.
IF Joe Biden or Hunter Biden broke any laws, there is nothing forbidding Trump's DOJ from indicting them. Why don't they?
Hi leomoon.
It's called "jurisdiction."
The FBI cannot just boogie into another country and start running around conducting an investigation whenever they want.
What, you thought the German Polizei come to the US and start rifling through the papers of the federal and state governments and private businesses whenever they want?
That's not how it works.
It requires both consent and cooperation.
I read respectable never Trumper facebook and twitter accounts and they are all silent about FISA Court fraud.
Hi Moondancing.
Of course they're silent. That FISA warrant was issued on 100% fraudulent grounds.
The entire thing was a sham to begin with david. The whole issue was based on air, with no evidence presented at all, just inconclusive and contradicting testimony from the few witnesses in the house.
Hi Dirus,
At the end of the day, they just can't accept that Hillary lost.
From Day One, they've refused to accept the results of the election and have tried to invalidate it anyway they can.
Bringing in new witness in the Senate is not how a trial is run there.
That's not how a trial is run in any state or federal court in the US.
I'm sorry, but TV drama surprise last minute witnesses or evidence is nothing but Hollywood fantasy.
That is not how it works in reality.
You know the names of every witness and every piece of evidence to be introduced at trial a very long time before the trial even begins.
New witnesses cannot be introduced except under very extraordinary circumstances, and even then only with the consent and approval of the judge prior to the witness testifying (and the judge will likely interview the witness in his chambers to see if their testimony is even remotely relevant) and even then the opposing party is given every opportunity to interview the witness at length before the witness ever testifies.