david starling
Well-known member
My problem isn't the plausibility or elegance of a theory/explanation. But what works in chart reading. So I'd want to see it demonstrated sufficiently before I become warmer to it.
I have a couple of placements at the end of signs and some at the beginning. It's difficult to parse if the blended influence comes from their positions at the cusps, or other placements in the chart augmenting them along similar lines.
It doesn't change much in Chart-reading. I'm more physically energetic than other Sun Pisceans I've observed, which I can attribute to a 28 degree cusp for my Sun. But, I still use Neptune as the ruler of my Sun-sign, not a mix of Neptune and Mars.
Same with the Age--as long as it's in Capricorn, the blending of Capricornian and Aquarian qualities doesn't change the Age rulership to include Uranian authority. Just that Saturn is becoming increasingly less "comfortable" in its Native-sign (aka "Domicle") Cap when it involves ruling the Age.
Last edited: