Ukpoohbear
Well-known member
sombong intelektual
@Hkk
You'd think that the Virgo phenotype would be quite boyish and "pretty". I've observed in my own life that women who are in more conservative environments (say - teachers, civil servants, finance) tend to like the clean-cut and sharp look on men. It would seem you fit this category of women, although you can correct me if I'm wrong about you.
My field is finance and leadership
My preference in men is the smartly dressed but rough look. Tattoos on body especially neck, stubble/beards. Whatever race. Doesn’t bother me
@passiflora
That's an interesting viewpoint on homosexual men and staying somewhat "virginal". Would you say psychically someone does not become an adult if they never conceive or experience being a parent? What would you say about monks and nuns who are celibate for life? What would you think is the growth path for those who never mature through a family life?
@Uranus
Why are you so interested in Jamaica? Genuine question I promise. Do I seem like I may be interested in such a position in society?
Strange my response came up your reply part
What's strange about it?
Oh, I just saw that your more elaborate response was stuck in the middle. Interesting, I'll file that away in my dossier on you.
I'll file that away in my dossier on you.
I laugh a lot about your picky words. Lol.
Sure. I don't know before whether the dancehall and ska are far more popular than globally fame reggae in its own country. You see, it's just a simple prove that one shouldn't take everything from the epicentre of internet.
The level of complicated grammar, which you choose are top notch for boastful way of political life. Which party are you down into? Labour or Nationalist?
Interesting CT hahaha!! What else is in your collection of me?
Do you have political aspirations? I've always thought that was attractive to you. Maybe it's because of your lawyer aspirations and your sense of justice for the native population of your country that makes me think that.
Not interested in either party.
David, over on “The Ugly Side of the Age of Aquarius” is a poster who’s done graduate-level research into the astrological Ages. Fun for you?
conspiracy theorist, that is a lot of trouble you can get me into with four short sentences. I think it varies tremendously with the individual. Maybe 200 years ago the answer would be different but raising a child today is not for everyone. I can't say it's in everyone's path to be nearly psychotically exhausted from sleep deprivation by someone who really can't go to anyone else. It is traumatic to bring children into a world designed against them and against mothers. Not for everyone. You can gain the kind of lessons in futility, responsibility, concern, protection, surprise, joy, and karmic evolution in other ways, like by being an auntie, uncle, mentor, volunteer, deeply involved in another's life, not just being abstractly or 'universally' concerned.