moonkat235
Well-known member
Why dont you or anyone else do it?
I've just literally never heard that before, so I'm curious where you heard it.
Why dont you or anyone else do it?
No, emotions are sensitivity and everyone has them and everyone has sensitivities. People who suppress their emotions are more likely to act out on their sensitives than people who deal with their emotions, delve into them, and face them, people who are more emotionally strong
I've just literally never heard that before, so I'm curious where you heard it.
I studied astrology for 3 years on various websites, most of it was done on astrotheme.com and cafeastrology.com, which do teach traditional astrology.
Don't those websites use like asteroids and the outer planets, which aren't included in traditional astrology?
And traditional astrology is the most widely known and accepted form of astrology.
There is a subforum here called "Traditional Astrology". You might take a look in there to be sure you're using your definitions correctly. It is not the most widely known or used. The most widely known and used is either Modern Western astrology (the one that all those magazine sun sign articles are based on) or Vedic Astrology, not sure which has more practitioners.
You're not comprehending what I'm saying...Moon, ruled by cancer, is our emotional sensitivity. Capricorn is the sign opposite of cancer, so why would cap moon not be emotionally tough and why would cancer moon not be emotionally sensitive? This isnt rocket science people.
You're not comprehending what I'm saying...
If a Cancer moon is sensitive, it's because they're emotional which you agree with. But everyone is emotional. A cancer moon would be less likely to suppress their emotions meaning they're actually stronger because they're able to learn to handle their emotions as opposed to people who suppress them because they don't feel strong enough to handle them
No, thats still wrong, but you were on the right track.
A cancer moon would be MORE likely to not suppress their emotions, because they lack the emotional strength to suppress them. Cancer is the sign of emotional sensitivity, yet you're acting as if it's ABC logic.
A capricorn moon would be MORE likely to suppress their emotions, because they have the emotional strength to suppress them. By your logic capricorn is the sign of emotional sensitivity and cancer is the sign of emotional maturity. Hell, by that same logic, aries is the sign of compassion and love and jupiter is the planet of logic and not luck.
What? How is that not what I am advancing with my argument?
How many times do I have to explain what I said before you understand?
How about this.
The moon acts as a mechanism of sorts, its only function is to distract and influence our rational thinking/logic (mercury)
We constantly are using both our mercury and our moon.
Which means that those celebrities got where they did because there mercuries AND their moons were both especially strong. Think of it like this:
WEAKLINGS in personality: People whose moon is dominated by water. Doesnt matter how good there mercury or anything else is in there charts. These are the loners of society, the anxiety ridden.
AVERAGES in personality: Those whose moon is dominated by earth, fire, or air. However these peoples mercury will be weak, otherwise they would be in the following tier below.
ABOVE AVERAGES in personality: Those whose moon is dominated by earth, fire, or air. These people also have strong mercuries.
How dense are you? You don't even realize that it would make more sense for any text made for astrological interpretations wouldn't be so poorly written that its description for moon in cancer is "This moon sign is awful", but rather it would breakdown the placement by its weaknesses and strengths and obviously would have no reason to explain it with harsh words.
Anyways, the astrological texts for all branches of astrology state that moon in cancer is a sensitive sign on the moon, so I would love to see you prove how any of what I've been saying is wrong.
What's sad is I already explained this well over the amount of times necessary but somehow you fail to grasp any of it. It's not even hard either.
I'm done here.
Well those studies are a steaming pile of ********, because the more sensitive one is emotionally, the less they can handle harshness of the world, they are easily emotionally bruised whereas those with lunar fire air or earth dominance are not. Why cant you get that through that thick skull of yours?
How about this one?
Think of it like this.
If water is representative of emotions, and the moon is representative of what our emotional durability is, then water energy would make the moon more sensitive. What about that makes you think that water energy would make the moon more emotionally durable as a result?
Following your retarded logic, if I run a marathon, I will GAIN energy from it, not LOSE energy from it.
Here's your problem. You keep ignoring the fact that those Mensa level people who have what you call a "weak" mercury have really good moon signs.
What everyone seems to forget or just not realize is that moon and mercury are the only planets that determine how we think, every other placement in the natal chart is either a planet that influences how we think, or just a planet that represents the results we achieve from our actions and thinking or a planet that represents how we are doing in a certain area of life, as expressed as an overall synopsis.
However there is ONE exception to this rule, that being the ASC, as the ASC is what determines how our body is physically as a whole, no other planet dictates this either. So if you were born with a aries ASC like me, you will have, one way or another, lots of physical/bodily energy, regardless of aspects as well, since the sign the ASC is in overrides the aspects it has in terms of importance and dominance.
So the ASC is the only planet that determines our physical looks
every other planet either has an influence over your physical looks and/or is what we can call a representation of how we might look.
mean it does this by at all determining how our body is physically, since again only our ASC can determine our body,
What this shows is that ASC can determine how we think, because it determines how our body is, and is the only planet that does this. In other words, venus determines attractiveness but not through it determining how our body is anyways. Only ASC can do that.
So if our ASC has some sort of aspect that makes the person's body have some type of deformation of a certain body part or organ, such as the brain, our thinking can be heavily influenced by that as a result.
With that in mind, we can now see that the only thing we have to do to understand how strong a person is socially is by looking at there three planets that can possibly dictate there thinking
So those who have displayed intelligence of Mensa, well lets just say they are that smart because either their moons are strong and/or their mercurys are as well, and their ASC determine there bodies, which can influence the thoughts and emotions through bodily conditions such as bad influences, like deformations, or good influences, such as lots of bodily energy. Which in turn will have it's effects as well.
Evolving, you are highly sensitive, so you're calling yourself dumb?