Random Thoughts, strictly Text

JUPITERASC

Well-known member
Both prosecutors are registered Democrats :smile:
“The undeniable facts are
that both attended the fundraiser
for one purpose and one purpose only
—they attended to meet the person
they believed would be the next President of the United States.”
 

JUPITERASC

Well-known member
Both prosecutors are registered Democrats :smile:
“The undeniable facts are
that both attended the fundraiser
for one purpose and one purpose only
—they attended to meet the person
they believed would be the next President of the United States.”
The Justice Department responded with a mystifying claim.
It told a San Diego court
that Robinson and Allen were asked to attend the fundraiser
“in the event of a protective security related incident
where immediate prosecutorial guidance would be necessary.” :smile:
 

JUPITERASC

Well-known member
the attendance at the fundraiser by the two prosecutors
“raises serious concerns
regarding a conflict of interest and a loss of impartiality.” :smile:
An earlier Justice Department letter
said that the prosecutors were
at the event “in their official capacity assisting law enforcement.” :smile:
Now, here at Judicial Watch, we’ve been around a long time.
We can’t remember ever hearing of a fundraiser
that needed the presence of two U.S. Attorneys
in case “immediate prosecutorial guidance would be necessary.” I
t’s a laughable claim
except that someone’s freedom is at stake.
So let’s call this for what it really is
: a lie to cover-up inappropriate conduct.
 
Top