Rebel Uranian, I take your statement as a challenge, and accept it.
socrates, I know that this is taking the thread a bit off its original asc/mask theme, but since it is very relevant to the Asc and how we pinpoint a live one, I'm going into it.
First, it is very important to record the time of your birth, as your father did, but this time rarely equates to the correct degree of the Asc. The event we call birth, parturition (separation from the mother), gives only a starting place for finding out the correct Asc. First breath and parturition theories are just that - common sense theories that astrologers have accepted on faith and have defended without first putting to a real test. I have. I also have developed an alternate theory drawing from outside astrology to explain it. Most important to know is that our "births" are not actually pinpointed by exoteric events of the mother's body (parturition), though they are always in partnership with them. It is the moment of Incarnation, an inter-dimensional event, that sets the correct Asc. Two independent sources (Edgar Cayce readings on astrology) and Incarn astrologer John Willner create the framework for this.
Socrates, a number of astrologers could take your chart and each separately come to a consensus conclusion that your Asc is in Gemini around 2-3* -- and all be dead wrong. This would be due to relying on transits (and maybe progressions with fat orbs) measured
in longitude only, ignoring the declinations. An Asc in longitude arc at 2GEM43 equates to about 20N40 in declination. You have Pluto at 20N08, which is close enough for cross resonance and would intensify any planetary energy through that area, since at the ends of declination North and South the planets slow down and stay longer in that area of 20-23*. You also have Mercury at 3* Aquarius, which can also create a cross resonance in longitude. I know something about these kinds of mistakes since I've made them with clients before. This is how I learned.
I guarantee you 100% that you do not have your correct, functional Asc anywhere in the sign of Gemini. You could keep the chart as it is and work with it that way, but when planets move through the early degrees of mutable signs you won't be getting angular transits to your Asc.
I have validation standards that I adhere to that set my work apart from 99% of other astrologers and from mainstream astrology. I don't know what your correct Asc sign is, since I know little about you, but I do know that it is not Gemini, and if you are willing I will put that to the test right here,
pro bono, nothing for you to lose. I use the most stringent consistent validation standards in the field of astrology:
http://kannonmcafee.wordpress.com/2011/11/17/standards-for-the-validation-of-birth-horoscopes/
The 19*27' Taurus Asc [17N36] would be ContraParallel Jupiter, as well as trine Sun and Venus.
The 0*16' Taurus Asc [11N34] would be Parallel Uranus, ContraParallel the Moon, square Mercury and Saturn, as well as trine Uranus.
The 29*35' Aries chart would have basically the same aspects as a 0* Taurus Asc.
The 7*53' Aries Asc [3N08] would be sextile Mercury and Jupiter, square Mars, and quincunx Pluto.
Any astrologer who does a "rectification" for you that affirms the 2-3* Gemini Asc is simply creating a fiction for you, and for themselves.
Just in case you haven't read my thread on Asc signs:
http://www.astrologyweekly.com/forum/showthread.php?t=25131