Random Thoughts, strictly Text
- Thread starter david starling
- Start date
david starling
Well-known member
Right. It's become an avoidable distraction.
You are free to not continue this conversation and/or not answer, but I am free to quote your posts if I want to do so.
What people define as distractions may sometimes be something that reminds them of something within themselves that they dont want to look at for reasons that still remains a "mystery".
Y
JUPITERASC
Well-known member
david starling
Well-known member
Quite
You don't have to make up complicated excuses for not including the Outermosts. You're perfectly entitled not to include them, just as Modernistic astrologers are perfectly entitled to use them.
You don't have to make up complicated excuses for not including the Outermosts. You're perfectly entitled not to include them, just as Modernistic astrologers are perfectly entitled to use them.
Complicated excuses? What is so unreasonable about them?
-> 
-> 
Last edited:
david starling
Well-known member
Feelings are subjective. If you've convinced yourself of something, you feel it's right. We all do that.
Sorry, but the average increase of temperature at and after noon is not subjective, same as what I mentioned about the Ascendant and the Lot of Fortune. They are objective, and you have to accept them in order to live with REALITY.
Still only half-listening
Why do you need a MORE verifiable theory to admit that the other is limited?
Since the objective techniques based on physically observable phenomena don't accurately describe my physical body - I am still waiting for an explanation as to WHY.
Hi passiflora,
Have you read my thread, and especially points 22., 23., 40. and the commentary on them? - https://www.astrologyweekly.com/forum/showthread.php?t=130820
I can't give more help than that, you are free to look for help elsewhere.
JUPITERASC
Well-known member
You don't have to make up complicated excuses for not including the Outermosts. You're perfectly entitled not to include them, just as Modernistic astrologers are perfectly entitled to use them.
Complicated excuses? What is so unreasonable about them?
ExactlySorry, but the average increase of temperature at and after noon is not subjective,
same as what I mentioned about the Ascendant and the Lot of Fortune.
They are objective, and you have to accept them in order to live with REALITY.
JUPITERASC
Well-known member
would you listenI appreciate your willingness to do cold reading, which I wouldn't do.
But no help is required!!
It's a question to YOU since you are avidly defending a theory in the abstract,
which didn't square with observable physical reality when applied to my own case
Still only half-listening
.
I appreciate your willingness to do cold reading, which I wouldn't do. But no help is required!! It's a question to YOU since you are avidly defending a theory in the abstract, which didn't square with observable physical reality when applied to my own case
I thought you found my free reading that I gave to you in private accurate in most respects? But now you say it is all cold reading? OK.
david starling
Well-known member
Sorry, but the average increase of temperature at and after noon is not subjective, same as what I mentioned about the Ascendant and the Lot of Fortune. They are objective, and you have to accept them in order to live with REALITY.
We each have our own version of Reality.
''In these points the ignorant go astray and therefore I must mention these same points so often: it is better to repeat, even to be verbose, and so keep this treatise free from criticism than to present an opportunity for abuse to envious and small-minded persons. These persons are pained by the success of others and revile work that is well done; they cannot follow what is being said nor think critically about what they say. The following story applies to such persons: they say that a young man was critically revising the plays of Euripides. The playwright was standing by and said, “If it is badly written, you write it better.” The youth said, “I do not know how to write poetry, but I can revise what has been badly written.” Euripides then said, “So then, write something badly and then revise your own composition to make it good.”'' - https://www.csus.edu/indiv/r/rileymt/Vettius Valens entire.pdf
Ok ynnest, so it's feminized men who partake of vicious gaming to amass masculine power. Makes total sense.
Men who hold on to small d syndrome are from my perspective making a choice to feminize themselves, which in one way or another from my perspective inevitably leads to suppression of their full masculinity which could lead to misdirected, uncontrolled and/or unresponsible acts of violence and/or aggression, but I cannot say if vicious gaming is one aspects of that because its from where someone is coming from when playing such games that is more important/dominates the specific act itself of playing the game in my view.
Y
Last edited:
david starling
Well-known member
I believe Reality as it's generally known, is subject to change.
JUPITERASC
Well-known member
for example
Reality is flat.
Some are camping out on the edge of Reality, and
some have gone over the edge.
Quite
david starling
Well-known member
Last edited: