In the western world, feminism is focused on securing women's rights and to fight for social change to advance women's status. But, many critics charge feminism is "limited" in their scope or focused mainly on professional, white and affluent subsection of women. Intersectionality on the needs of minority, LGBT, third world, non-rich, disabled and older women are suggested for inclusion in their agenda. Feminists in the 1970s weren't inclusive of trans-women or non-binary biological females, nowadays they're completely.
Feminism believes they don't have full equality known as (cis-)male privilege, that cis-men have more liberties and advantages of being male than what women receive. Even if the woman is white/ Caucasian/European, she has less than her male counterpart, but she has more opportunities than let's say Black/African-American/ women of color. There are like 9 kinds of privileges I can think of: by race, biological sex, sexual orientation, religion, disability, age group, citizenship, place of birth (developed world) and income class.
The USA should be a "free" country for women as much for men, but the USA is behind northern/ western Europe in gender equality. As much there are many countries in the world where women have less rights due to laws, customs and religious beliefs. A few of them like Saudi Arabia strictly prohibit abortion, for example. Feminists worldwide believe abortion should be legal and safely performed to protect the life of a woman of an unwanted child, esp. in the case of rape and incest, or a life-threatening medical condition.