david starling
Well-known member
Peto, why the long hiatus between the First and Second appearances of the Savior?
They literally applied their own Christian Agey spin.
Peto, why the long hiatus between the First and Second appearances of the Savior?
This is about tropical astrological Ages, and what occurred within their time periods.
The Age of the Greek Centaur sagittarius manifested the Hellenistic culture, from beginning to end. The "Church Age", as it's called, conforms to the Age of the Scapegoat capricorn, beginning around 400 A.D.
The tropical Age of the Egyptian Phoenix scorpio manifested the First Dynasty of Ancient Egypt right at the beginning, c.3100 B.C.E. So, I associate the Egyptian Phoenix with the astrological Sign of that Age, during which death and renewal were a major theme.
How do you know that the beginning of the first dynasty was c. 3100 BC?
So I've read in history books.
Based on what?
A consensus among historians. What's your timeline for the 1st Dynasty?
Another thing--many believe the Hindu Kali Yuga started at about 3100 B.C.E. Interesting coincidence.
I want to see on what basis is this consensus built on. 32nd century BC is 10 centuries too early from the global flood described in the book of Genesis.
Doesn't the final age reduce average human lifespan from about 1000 to about 100 years? That is an interesting coincidence.
Local flooding happens on a regular basis. This isn't the final Age. Aquarian Age is up next.
Every nation under the Sun has belief in a past global flood.
A far distant past. The Age-cycle I'm describing astrologically is within the limits of recorded history since the more recent invention of writing, c.3500-3200 B.C.E.
Some of them actually assume a so-called young earth like the Chinese, others - so-called old earth like the Indians. This happened after the Logos of God came down from heaven and mingled the pronunciations of the nations - Gen. 11:7.
Again friend, on what basis do you say that writing was invented c. 3500 BC?
Historians and archeologists. All you have is religious belief in a book written in relatively recent times, with no hard evidence.
The Aquarian Age will bring clarity. For now, we're all living in a Dark Age.
I am asking you for the third time what is the hard evidence that recent historians and archeologists use to assign these dates in contradiction to the book written 3500 years before them.
It was written more than 2000 years later than cuneiform writing is known to have existed.
Archeological is an interesting subject. Are you discounting it as a real record of human history?
I haven't discounted anything. I just asked you a question which you haven't answered yet.