david starling
Well-known member
Mon Source! Oh la Source!
Mon Dieu! Oh la Dieu! That just sounds better.
Mon Source! Oh la Source!
there are so many saucersMon Source! Oh la Source!
Mon Dieu! Oh la Dieu! That just sounds better.
If male was only dominant and woman submissive, then god wouldn't have created situations that lead women to lose their femininity through abuse or a man to lose his masculinity through abuse and so on. Women become masculine cos they need to or are conditionsd to and men become feminine cos they are conditioned to. And those scenarios are all gods creation.
JA, the ancient Egyptians had a solar god, Ra (Re,) but the father-god of Judaism, Babylon, Greece, Rome, and the Levant was actually a rain and storm deity. Jupiter/Zeus, El of the Phoenicians and Syrians, and Marduk were gods of rain and storms. See also the descriptions of God in the Bible, a God who withholds rain through drought as a means of punishing immoral behavior.
Today we tend to think of the sun as the primary giver of life, but in a seasonally arid climate prone to drought, water was equally seen as essential for life.
Note that in Greco-Roman lore, Apollo (sun) was the son of Jupiter/Zeus.
Gender identities
Our ideas about what it means to be a woman or a man
- that is, our gender constructs
- are given meaning and importance in our day-to-day reality.
Gender identities permeate so much of our experience
that it is easy to forget that they are just ideas
- ideas created to categorize human beings
Nevertheless, the categories of masculine and feminine
are often treated as if they were eternal truths.
But they are not.
They have no objective reality.
Because gender is a concept, it is a product of our mind
- and has no absolute existence that is separate from the mind that conceives of it.
Gender categories are not inherently real in and of themselves.
17th Karmapa - from the book:
"The Heart Is Noble: Changing the World from the Inside Out"
My personal observation is that by and large, this acculturated construct exaggerating traits into male or female, is an ancient politically motivated construct to control men and restrict women.
As the can of worms that is the artificial moon wriggles loose, all these illusions will be upended.
That which I perceive as likened to the status of deity, transcends gender.
Than you have XX, XY and 0 and 1... just a little more mud for your water.
Why not ask which numbers wear dresses, and then we'll argue which among those is actually a kilt?
The Aquarian Age will clarify the gender issue. The ancient gender construct will fade away.
I see this trend is happening: 50 years ago, women were re-defying what it means to be female, and rejected many restrictive gender roles and customs. 25 years ago, society believed we have done away with gender, but they were incorrect. Today, more biological males are expressing themselves in what our society assumed they are feminine. In the 2000s and 10s, we had gay rights and transgender rights movements, including same-sex marriage became legal in all 50 states and territories, and our society is more familiar and tolerant of transgender people than the last century/millennia/astrological (pisces) age.
What is "re-defying"?
Are you trying to say redefining?
The botched revisionism you parrot sounds like it came from a cardboard university professor. You really should take the time to do some research before throwing this kind of tripe out there. I won't even broach how much is wrong with your statement.
Far as a construct, the only constants are XX and XY.
At least until 5g and other degrading factors completely destroy that.
Time for some heavy Pluto studies.
AH- Mr. Starling- I looked it up myself:
Humans are born with 46 chromosomes in 23 pairs. The X and Y chromosomes determine a person’s sex. Most women are 46XX and most men are 46XY. Research suggests, however, that in a few births per thousand some individuals will be born with a single sex chromosome (45X or 45Y) (sex monosomies) and some with three or more sex chromosomes (47XXX, 47XYY or 47XXY, etc.) (sex polysomies). In addition, some males are born 46XX due to the translocation of a tiny section of the sex determining region of the Y chromosome. Similarly some females are also born 46XY due to mutations in the Y chromosome. Clearly, there are not only females who are XX and males who are XY, but rather, there is a range of chromosome complements, hormone balances, and phenotypic variations that determine sex.
From https://www.who.int/genomics/gender/en/index1.html
Seems mighty peculiar all of society MUST be upended for what I have heard is .001-.003% of the population. Then reduce that by the half that the attending delivery-room physician got right.
Bear in mind, I trust the WHO as much as the AMA and UN/NATO, which is to say, not at all.
I see this trend is happening: 50 years ago, women were re-defying what it means to be female, and rejected many restrictive gender roles and customs. 25 years ago, society believed we have done away with gender, but they were incorrect. Today, more biological males are expressing themselves in what our society assumed they are feminine. In the 2000s and 10s, we had gay rights and transgender rights movements, including same-sex marriage became legal in all 50 states and territories, and our society is more familiar and tolerant of transgender people than the last century/millennia/astrological (pisces) age.
Why would anyone think that the one supreme being would have gender?
How anthropomorphic!