Frisiangal
Well-known member
A few weeks ago a forum member included an astro.com chart with 'traditional' decan(ate)s.
If I remember, I think about decanate influence as an additional influence to interpretation.
I've come up with a snag!
I have always understood that the 'traditional' decanates were divisions of 10* PER SIGN within the sign of the same element. Aries-Leo-Sagittarius, Leo- Sagittarius-Aries, Sagittarius-Aries-Leo, etc.etc.
On the astro.com charts, the 'traditional' decanates are shown BY PLANET.
Mars-Sun-Jupiter, etc.etc.
I checked with the other decanate styles and these are also given per planet.
To my way of thinking, there is a difference in interpretation between a natal planet 'coloured' by a SIGN ( traits within character) and a PLANET (function) decanate.
E.g. only. Venus in 2nd decanate of Libra with Aquarius undertones, would have a different interpretation than Venus in Libra with Uranus (and/or Saturn?) undertones.
Which 'traditional' decanate division is correct?
If I remember, I think about decanate influence as an additional influence to interpretation.
I've come up with a snag!
I have always understood that the 'traditional' decanates were divisions of 10* PER SIGN within the sign of the same element. Aries-Leo-Sagittarius, Leo- Sagittarius-Aries, Sagittarius-Aries-Leo, etc.etc.
On the astro.com charts, the 'traditional' decanates are shown BY PLANET.
Mars-Sun-Jupiter, etc.etc.
I checked with the other decanate styles and these are also given per planet.
To my way of thinking, there is a difference in interpretation between a natal planet 'coloured' by a SIGN ( traits within character) and a PLANET (function) decanate.
E.g. only. Venus in 2nd decanate of Libra with Aquarius undertones, would have a different interpretation than Venus in Libra with Uranus (and/or Saturn?) undertones.
Which 'traditional' decanate division is correct?