Lin's post prompts me to comment.
1. We are born with a certain chart that prescribes our potentials.
2. We spend our childhood immersed in the culture of birth, and immediately influenced by parents.
At puberty our mind crystallizes and becomes different in quality from that of the child. The sponge-like absorptive character of the mind in childhood rapidly acquires structure, hardens. Our individuality is now set firmly and will not change.
All of our childhood experience, good or bad, is deeply ingrained in our psyche, and this creates our "innate" character. Our path has been marked -- we set off in a certain direction. That direction will lead us into new experience (which is set out along the path waiting for our arrival) which in turn forms our character even further.
So now we are pulling a cart full of pre-conditioning along with us. Unless we can empty and finally discard that cart, we are controlled by it. We have been convinced (unconsciously, by childhood experience), that we must stay in the traces pulling that cart until the day of doom. Very few people ever fully rid themselves of the cart and its baggage.
Suppose my father was a cruel and brutal man, and I bear the scars to prove it. Now I become a father. As a parent one of two courses is probable regarding how I deal with my own children -- I will either be a cruel and brutal father like my own dad, or I will react to that childhood cruelty by being very soft, permissive etc with my own kids, having taken a sacred vow to never treat my children as I had been treated. Either way, my actions as a parent are pre-determined by my own childhood experience.
We need to be aware that the horsocope shows not only our deep and immutable natural inclinations but also the nature of those early experiences. [Think on the essential and the accidental dignities]. Both our inherent nature and the nature of our formative experiences is shown in the horoscope. If this is so then there really isn't much room for a sovereign free will.
Liken your life to a ship, departing San Francisco and bound for Yokohama. Once at sea, the command of the ship, its course, is in the hands of the master. If he runs into a storm, or pirates, or sirens beckoning from the rocks of Scylla, he can change course, speed up, slow down...but he must arrive at Yokohama. Depending on the time of departure from San Francisco, those storms and pirates and sirens are already in his future path, waiting. The changes of course the ship makes (decisions, choices, free will) are already determined because the events to be met are there waiting. The ship must respond to them, and the captain's choices are determined by his character.
President Lincoln had a devil of a time finding a general who would fight the war and win. Then he found Grant. Here was courage, aggression, determination, tenacity in one package. Grant's character determined his choices in battle and won the war. That innate character met each passing circumstance -- made choices, exercised free will -- in accord with the general's inherent and acquired traits. In other words, his choices were pre-determined. McClellan would not have made the same choices.
A good book that has to do with this theme: Man's Search for Meaning, Victor Frankl.
Oh. I don't think the word "programmed" is appropriate here. We are not computers or robots. We are living creatures (I think they call it sentient). We have emotions, desires (our bane) and so on. We do have the power of choice (free will) although it is far more limited than most of us would like to believe.