david starling
Well-known member
I'm using the Ascendant as a sign-ruler. I'm also blending signs at their cusps. Both of these practices are "heretical", the first more so than the latter. Aside from the tired old "that's just NOT how it's done", can anyone come up with any LOGICAL reasons why either one of these practices is fundamentally in error? Arguably, the Ascendant is the most important factor in a Chart. In fact, the word "horoscope" itself is a direct reference to the Asc. Which is why it's a misnomer to label a Sun-sign-only column, as seen in newspapers, as a "horoscope", because it excludes the Asc. from consideration.
Not expecting to convince anyone of anything, just looking for a friendly, logical discussion.
Not expecting to convince anyone of anything, just looking for a friendly, logical discussion.