May the MFR be with you!
Jesus, we had a serious discussion so far before it degenerated.
May the MFR be with you!
No, but are you doubting that process of birth is also controlled by the planets?
Btw, it's interesting thing to note that according to Gauquelin, that is the case. I've always wondered if he wasn't basing it on the relationship between the two. I would respectfully disagree though for a few reasons.
clearly a misunderstanding of my commentVisible celestial bodies describe a moment in spacetime.
Space-time interacts with celestial bodies, but they do not create it!
probablyI think that JA might have been confused
with how the planets gave rise to our definition of
the year (one revolution of Sun)
month (one revolution of the Moon),
week (the seven planets)
and day (one revolution of the caelum).
The circadian rhythm, for example, is approximately aligned with the day.
Jesus, we had a serious discussion so far before it degenerated.
TheoreticallySomeday, theoretical physics will catch up to astrology, and
be able to explain it according to the precepts of modern science.
Interesting. Has this theory helped you come up with astrological results? Because Aristotelian universals have helped me better understand the planets and the zodiac more than any astrology book.
Like Newton said, "standing on the shoulders of giants" enables us to see further.
Did you try to dodge my question?
Astrology could never have been conceived of in our own Age. We have to rely on the intuition, visionary abilities, and reasoning of past Ages to form the foundation of we're able to see now, using what's been given. Even something as simple as the division of the zodiac into 12 equal parts is part of our astrological inheritance. But when it was being developed, there wasn't unanimous agreement on "what it all meant".
I'm focused primarily on the patterns formed by the sequence of Modalities and Elements. Is Aristotle the originator of those? Ptolemy is said to have interpreted them, but that their origin predates him.
This Moment is defined and described by the cosmic elements we have chosen to use as our astrological tools -- planets, signs, aspects and such.
Just what is it that is described by this horoscope? It is not a person, or a question about a missing cat. Our only input was Time and Place (Spacetime), so that the only thing the arrangement of the heavens can directly describe is the Moment itself and nothing more.
clearly a misunderstanding of my comment
i.e.
without visible celestial bodies
nothing to see
Waybread, I get the feeling you are trying to play some double game here, because I believe most people here would think of synchronicity as an objective type, rather than cold reading (which ''often'' is synchronous).
Not at all.Not at all.
The idea of a planet exerting some influence on human behavior
breaks down
when you consider horary, which goes by the moment of the question.
Currently there are no robust theories as to why astrology should work-- assuming that it does.