http://www.jimstonefreelance.com/fukureport1b.pdf
The 3/11 earthquake, tsunami, and nuclear disaster did not occur naturally. In this report you will find all the evidence needed to support this claim and more. This is a vital report because it documents the dawning of a new type of environmental warfare in which advanced technologies are used to make unsuspecting populations believe their destruction occurred by the will of nature, thus leaving the destroyers in a position to demandgovernments stay silent while they perform the job of destroying or enslaving their populations to the will of the global “elite”.
1. Reactor 3 is completely missing, which means the press and anyone who has claimed anythinabout pressures, temperatures, containment, ect at reactor 3 after March 14 2011 is lying and people need to pay attention to it, because failure of the public to realize the massive extent of the lies about what is going on there will leave the door open to a repeat event. Lies must be told to hide what really happened at Fukushima, because like false flag terror in the name of Arabs, once the secret about environmental terrorism and industrial warfare is known, it's usefulness isminimized.
A missing reactor 3 proves the hydrogen explosion theory false, because all reactor engineers know that you cannot lose a reactor entirely absent having a massive explosion on the order of a nuclear weapon make it disappear. Yet reactor 3 is indeed blown to
smithereens with the control rods and reactor guts laying out in the open in the outer containment structure, as shown in the photo below:
Here we have reactor 3's guts laying out in the open, with the core spray system still trying to function. Notice all the dust mixed in with the debris, dust which could never have happened from a mere hydrogen blast. A large portion of this dust is reactor core material as indicated by it's color, and the rest is concrete. It is important to know that it takes a detonation
(supersonic explosion) to turn concrete into dust, and even under ideal conditions with a perfect oxygen/hydrogen mixture, an open air hydrogen ignition never achieves the shock wave speed of a detonation. The dust alone proves that something other than hydrogen did this.
2.
Reactor 4 is Building 7, demolished by explosives. The biggest smoking gun proving the Fukushima disaster was in fact an act of war is the near mythically impossible destruction of Reactor 4, which exploded despite not having a core, as mysteriously as building 7 fell on 9/11 despite never being hit by a plane. Reactor 4 had been defueled and was undergoing replacement of it's internal stainless steel shroud, yet according to the official story blew it's containment anyway. That is the FINAL smoking gun, an empty reactor is inert and cannot produce an explosion, yet one happened at 4 that was so powerful it destroyed the structure which had a frame consisting of solid steel columns a minimum of12 feet thick, and solid concrete and rebar walls on that frame which were 4 feet thick, leaving it in danger of falling over. There is nothing short of a small nuclear weapon that can blow a structure that strong to pieces, demolition charges will not do it absent occupying much of the interior space which would have been obvious to workers. Unlike what some people have theorized, that the hydrogen came from the fuel pool, overheated open fuel pools cannot produce hydrogen because in an open fuel pool the water boils off at 100 Celsius, and the hydrogen producing scenario requires water to be in pressurized form at 2,000 degrees Celsius to liberate it's hydrogen by losing it's oxygen to the zircon cladding in the fuel rods. The entire hydrogen story needs the right environment to happen, and that environment requires temperatures of 2000 degrees Celsius, saturated steam, and thousands of PSI inside a reactor to happen. This makes any explosion at reactor 4, which was wide open and disassembled flatly impossible. Knowing reactor 4 could never have exploded because it was disassembled created a problem for the people fronting the environmental warfare scam. Since it was impossible for reactor 4 to explode while mothballed, a fact which would be easy for the public to grasp, an alternate explanation for the explosion at reactor 4 was hatched by none other than Arnie Gundersen, who claimed a “prompt criticality” occurred in the fuel pool, which supposedly went off like a nuclear weapon. But that only flew with the most ignorant in the population, because a nuclear weapons style “prompt criticality” can happen only with nuclear material that is 70 percent enriched plutonium, or 90 percent enriched uranium, and THEN only when a high precision explosive charge brings that material together in a calculated way at supersonic speeds. Even if the fuel in the pool was 90 percent enriched, the racks it is in and lack of a nuclear trigger to bring it all
together correctly would have prevented any prompt criticality. Nuclear detonations are hard to accomplish, they don't happen by accident. This report includes a background investigation of Arnie Gundersen, who is in fact not a nuclear expert of any sort and proves he is a media fraud and paid government shill. Arnie has made a lot of money as a political tool and using the ignorance of nuclear topics in the general population to do damage to good people and firmly root the ability of the “elite” to carry out repeat attacks on facilities similar to Fukushima. This is accomplished by backstabbing the nuclear industry, and pointing the finger in the wrong direction, away from the perpetrators.His consulting firm “Farewinds and Associates” was founded as a one man show and remained that way for decades, with Arnie as the “chief engineer” exaggerating and lying about his credentials, which was proven in my investigation of Arnie and Farewinds. This investigation is included as an attachment to this report.
Because Arnie's “prompt criticality” was an easily proven fraud, and there was no way for reactor 4 to explode, an alternate theory which involved back feeding of hydrogen through the hard vent piping from reactor 3 was hatched. Though hydrogen <i>could</i> have back fed from reactor 3 in very small amounts under the most insanely poorly managed circumstances, the sheer force of the explosion at reactor 4 alone proves the cause of that explosion was not hydrogen. Add to this the story line that there was no power, no switches or relays creating sparks, and the hydrogen explosion theory becomes all the more ludicrous, it takes more than hydrogen to create an explosion, it takes an ignitionsource and if we are to follow the “official” story line about no power being available that source of ignition simply did not exist at <i>any</i> of the four reactors.
Reactor 4's dome was removed for defueling. Drone photos prove it. This dispels the rumors surrounding unit 4's explosion. Some people have said that
this reactor was secretly in operation to enrich plutonium. This photo proves it was disassembled for shroud replacement as stated. Tepco is going out of it's way trying to explain the explosions, especially at reactor 4 because they did indeed occur, so an explanation is needed. As a result they are giving reasons that cannot happen just to say something. They need to see this report and get the Arava perspective(Arava is a district surrounding Dimona Israel). Like building 7 on 9/11, if there ever was a way to prove Fukushima was an act of
war and not an accident, reactor 4 is it. This is the biggest smoking gun at Fukushima that can be used to wakepeople up. You do not need to be any sort of expert to see that without a core, nothing can happen to a reactor other than willful destruction as an act of war. Attached to the end of this report is an additional article which shows that other nuclear facilities have been rigged to explode the way reactor 4 did, with an example in Sweden.
3.
That the destruction of reactors 3 and 4 is so severe it could only have been accomplishedwith nuclear weapons.
Hydrogen gas produces a non-ideal subsonic explosion. It cannot turn concrete into dust. It can produce high pressures if sealed off, but the metal roof on all the reactor containments should have provided the relief and been the only thing destroyed. It takes a high intensity explosive to strip concrete off rebar, a blast wave many times faster than supersonic. This means that whatever happened at Fukushima did not have blast characteristics that fit the "official" story. If you missed it in the high resolution photo of the destroyed facility, I took a car that was laying around in the remains and placed it on top of one of the blown away walls at reactor 3, which clearly gives the reference that the walls had support columns well over 12 feet thick. Fukushima reactor 1 was assumed by many to have been built with the Mark 1 containment design, with the other reactors being mark 2, but Ripley, (the reactor engineer I interviewed, who designed unit 3) stated that the Japanese were insanely cautious with nuclear and had the facilities and safety systems built far beyond G.E. Specs. It is true that gas explosions can be very destructive, but only in facilities that were not designed to handle them. Even the basic mark 1 containment lacking Japan's upgrades was many times beyond capable of withstanding the worst hydrogen blast, and when you see in the referenced photos that the walls indeed had solid steel columns over 12 feet thick holding concrete 4 feet thick it makes this point obvious. 4. That nuclear weapon(s) were placed inside of the reactor containment(s) disguised as security cameras installed under contract the year of the disaster by Arava based security firm Magna BSP (Arava is a district around Dimona, not a city.) Their "security cameras" weighed over 1,000 pounds and were the size and shape of a gun type nuclear weapons.
The reason Magna BSP gave for the odd shape, enormous weight, and giant proportions of their cameras was that they were stereoscopic. A stereoscopic camera could be plausible at an airstrip, where the camera would need depth perception out miles, but not indoors where focal lengths are short. The installation of one inside the inner containment of reactor 3 cannot be justified. Depth perception going out miles could also be accomplished with two separately mounted cameras weighing only a few pounds; the giant thousand pounder is a dead giveaway.
Why this giant thing, when smaller nukes are possible? Nuclear weapons always produce a certain amount of heat, and if a small design was used it would be obvious the "camera" was warm, even when turned off and sitting on the shelf. This would cause questions to be asked, especially in a nuclear power facility.
The enormous size and weight helped conceal the decay heat.
. . . . . . . . . .9/11, 4/11, 3/11? see a pattern? Let's not see another X/11. Your time and effort in spreading the word may really make a difference. The quake was not what we were told. In fact, the quake was a bold faced lie, packing a political agenda. The proof goes beyond the linked Japanese chart. Please note - the date listed at the top of the charts linked at the end of this report (which contains ALL the seismic data from all reporting stations for the entire 3/11 earthquake) is the date of compilation, Japan has thousands of seismic stations run by numerous organizations, and they take time to merge into one final report. That is the date listed at the top of the linked compilation (March 15), and there is a shill out there who can't figure this out, a fact which should be obviousbecause the main seismogram in this report is dated and timed to the quake, and is a match for the lower resolution seismograms in this large compilation. The online Fukushima report shows a video of what happened in the NHK newsroom during the quake. A few files fell over, the laser printer which was not secured stayed on its shelf, and people kept typing at their keyboards. If the quake was as represented in this chart,
people would have been thrown upwards at 3 g's of acceleration, which would have thrown them to the ceiling, and would have been thrown towards the back of the room at the same time at 2 g's of acceleration, smashing all of them and everything else in the room against the back wall. There is a reason why this “9.0” quake killed no one inland from the tsunami, and it is because it simply did not happen. The following chart is from station MYG012, which is less than 1/2 mile from the NHK newsroom. The NHK news room video, which was shot within half a kilometer of the seismic station Erol Kalkan used to produce this chart PROVES THE USGS LIED. THERE WAS NO 9.0 The USGS charts are phony folks, that's all there is to it! Scroll down to the video of the quake represented in the above chart, which represents a 9.0 and was reportedly from a seismic station only one half mile away from where the video was shot. The implications of this run deep. The seismic chart, in conjunction with the news room video, proves that the US government is also involved in the lie about the quake at some level. (this video is linked at the end of this report as it was functioning at the time of publication.) Since the video gets censored and deleted repeatedly from you tube because it proves the accuracy of this report, you might have to hunt for it.
Some people keep typing on their computers as the quake happens.
Also, note that most of the stuff stays on the desks, at the end, a laser printer is still sitting on a cheap table, ect. some things fall but things return to normal quickly,
all the while the English announcer is reading a script of devastation with all the pep of some paid fool who does not believe what he is saying in a cheezy infomercial. The quake was significant, but only in a 6.0 sense, as recorded by the JAPANESE seismographs, and FAKED to a 9.0 by the USGS. This is important footage, because it proves the earthquake measured at a 6.8 was an instrumentation based richterreading. Confusion between the Shindo and Richter scale is being used to cover this up . Remember that this video is proof of what really went on. This means there never were significant aftershocks, never was a natural tsunami, and if they lied about that, what else? This video is pivotal and vital to exposing the truth. I chose this video because the news room is within eyeshot of station MYG012, which was used by the USGS to make these graphs which represent an 8.8 AT THAT STATION , as was stated in this (English) newscast and was probably used as a guide to fudge the lie due to the closeness of the newsroom to the seismic station. The full USGS assessment of the Japan quake is in the appendix to this printed report. Of course, they offer no reading from MYG011, which was closest to the 9.0 "epicenter" by a long shot, because it only got a 5.63's worth ofshaking. The map which confirms this is later in this report.
E-mails From Japan show the quake was not what we were told
Readers in Japan are WELL AWARE the quake was not a 9.0 and the tsunami was artificial . I received mails like this for a total of about two days before they were censored. Some of these messages are from the same people sending updates.
My comments are in italics writers comments are in bold Initial quake was reported as a 7.2, epicenter in/near Tohoku -- this is what Japanese on the street were reading on their cell phones just after the event, this was Richter. Within 24 hours the magnitude was increased to 8.8, 8.9, 9.0....and, it seemed the epicenter was under debate.
My comment:
The first magnitude and epicenter are calculated by computer. These are in fact always correct, unless there is a political need to move the "epicenter" and increase the magnitude, in this case by about 100X and 85 miles. Furthermore, the people in Japan are telling me directly it was a richter measurement, NOT SHINDO.
I have been checking USGS regularly and notice there are lots of depth 10 km quakes. The 3/11and the 4/11 both are depth 10 km. Do you have any idea what that means.Scalar weapon?
Last edited: