Is Pluto an astrological planet?

JUPITERASC

JUPITERASC

Well-known member
muchacho said:
Don't forget Mars and Jupiter!
They all haven't fully cleared their orbits yet.
:biggrin:
Click to expand...
which is incorrect because

On the contrary
Along with its moons, Jupiter's gravitational field
CONTROLS NUMEROUS ASTEROIDS
that have settled into the regions of the Lagrangian points
preceding and following Jupiter in its orbit around the Sun.


These are known as the Trojan asteroids, and are divided into Greek and Trojan "camps"
to commemorate the Iliad.


InnerSolarSystem-en.png



This diagram shows the Trojan asteroids in Jupiter's orbit, as well as the main asteroid belt :smile:
 
JUPITERASC

JUPITERASC

Well-known member
ALRESCHA said:
Pluto rules death. Nobody gets a Pluto return! :w00t:

I would like to ask you what would you be doing on your Pluto return day? :lol:
Click to expand...
given that you just stated no-one experiences an 'astrological dwarf planet pluto return'
then that comment makes no sense
ALRESCHA said:
As for the credible evidence, I am yet to meet a Mo90Pl person who does not feel at some point that their mother is a phyton,
no matter the rest of the chart...
mind you, that story could go on and on and on...
Click to expand...
And it certainly is a potentially rich modern astrological seam
since there are at least 56 objects in the Kupier Belt similar if not identical with 'dwarf astrological planet pluto'
ALRESCHA said:
You just wait, this Pl90Ur will eventually result in people uploading their consciousness to a super computer of some kind
to live forever ahahahahaha
Click to expand...
Clearly you are unaware that this aim is nothing new and is as old as the hills
and is doomed simply because it is dependent on 'a super computer of some kind that lives forever'
good luck with building one of those :smile:
ALRESCHA said:
Here it is
Quote:
Originally Posted by ALRESCHA
Jupiter never cleared its orbit either. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jupiter_trojan
nor has Mars.


you have already responded to it too.

But let's not play trial, OK?
Click to expand...
interesting that you would not quote your comment until I quoted muchacho's comment
you simply echoed muchacho's comment :smile:
ALRESCHA said:
Just because I mentioned a super computer, does not mean I like it and/or want anyone to build one.

So, clearly, we believe that not only those that come back soon are planets.
Maybe we should make a thread about Pluto returns and what happens when Pluto hits certain places.
For instance, Charles Darwin and Galileo share the same Pluto degree.

I already addressed the rest of your post before.
Click to expand...
You are welcome to make any number of threads of your choice
the topic of this thread is whether or not dwarf planet pluto is 'an astrological dwarf planet or not'
 
JUPITERASC

JUPITERASC

Well-known member
Caprising said:
Modern astrologers studied Pluto before deciding what (if any) effect it has,
there is a consensus and Pluto is well entrenched into modern astrology despite what you want to see.
Click to expand...
Modern astrologers have not had time to study even ONE complete orbit
of 'dwarf astrological planet' pluto
around the sun
because that takes 248 years :smile:


e-e-cummings-laughter-quote.jpg
 
JUPITERASC

JUPITERASC

Well-known member
waybread said:
Once more, with feeling:
The 2006 IAU designation is irrelevant to traditional astrologers who don't use Pluto anyway. Before or after, it makes no difference.

The IAU designation is irrelevant to modern astrologers who found no change in Pluto's effectiveness before or after the IAU designation.
Click to expand...
Modern astrologers agreed with IAU designation when pluto was a planet
Modern astrologers disagreed with IAU designation when pluto was demoted to dwarf planetary status

waybread said:

Astronomy is not astrology. Really, it's that simple.
Click to expand...
Modern astrologers agree with astronomy when it suits them. 'Really it's that simple'
waybread said:

Very disingenuous. Count up all your posts on this thread and your Pluto cartoon thread.
Count up everyone else's posts on this thread and your Pluto cartoon thread. Who tops the lists-- by a country mile?
Click to expand...

If you want to spend your time obsessively counting posts on this thread and other threads then that's your choice

In any event it's unsurprising I comment on this thead
I'm the OP
waybread said:
Pluto is about suppressed facts that one doesn't like to face.
Click to expand...
Is that all?
waybread said:
We moderns like studying astrological Pluto. We use it. Deal With It.
Click to expand...
By all means continue to do so
Not all astrologers use 'dwarf astrological planets'
'Deal with it'
waybread said:
And please, your history argument is one such chestnut.
You read history and biographies? We read history and biographies.
We can see how Pluto operated in the past, easily.
Click to expand...
How dwarf planet pluto allegedly 'operated in the past' is a matter of opinion
waybread said:
Traditional astrologers developed the concept of the Great Year,
even though none of them would live a fraction of its 24,000 cycle.

This is why I think you're obsessive.
We've answered your same old arguments over and over again.
You won't listen to any argument that supports modern astrology.
Click to expand...
The same old arguments you yourself post
have been refuted multiple times
yet you keep repeating them
by your definition then
you think you yourself are obsessive
waybread said:
Given how little you've studied it,
I guess all you can do to keep your beliefs about modern astrology is to repeat your same old, same old.
Click to expand...
Another baseless assumption
that you keep repeating in the same old, same old way
waybread said:
The only reason I don't give up in disgust
is because I don't want a fledgling astrologer to read the kind of misinterpretations
some of the trads post about modern astrology and think that they're correct.

If you really believe in a "live and let live" astrology, I suggest you do that.
Click to expand...
So you think that your arguments are the sole arguments for 'fledgling astrologers' to consider
and that any arguments to the contrary must be 'misreperesentations'
however
the fact is
'fledgling astrologers' are quite capable of forming their own opinion
by considering all the pros and cons
so do continue posting your same old, same old arguments
and they shall be refuted
 
conspiracy theorist

conspiracy theorist

Well-known member
I sympathize with your trip down memory lane, JA. Reigniting old arguments and responding to ghostly vestiges of long gone posters is a creative way to engage with the nostalgia, in my opinion.
 
unique_astrology

unique_astrology

Well-known member
In these charts events consistent with the nature of a planet or combination of planets located on any angle can be expected to be interpreted. It is the nature of the planets involved, not which angle they are on to be considered.
 
Top