david starling
Well-known member
The cazimi of Venus occurs every 8 years at almost the same spot. Venus definitely can't be cazimi in all signs in a lifetime.
Here's some information on the subject:
http://fallonastro.com/text-cazimivenus-04.html
Cazimi
- Thread starter david starling
- Start date
Here's some information on the subject:
http://fallonastro.com/text-cazimivenus-04.html
david starling
Well-known member
There was a Mercury cazimi Oct. 27, 2016, in tropical Scorpio.
I told you that just like her stations occur only in certain signs, this also has to apply to her inferior and superior conjunctions.
david starling
Well-known member
JUPITERASC
Well-known member
Thanks
no mention on that link re: Venus cazimi in Sagittarius recently
not Scorpio, Sagittarius and not Mercury, Venus
Give me a single source besides Henry Coley please
keep in mind that I'm no expertDo you know what a source means?
simply a student on our astrological learning forum
"….........'Application' is of two species.
One is application in longitude
the other is application in latitude. . .
If application in latitude is from conjunction
then it is, when the two planets are in one sign
and they are equal in degrees in longitude
and in latitude
and are in the same direction
and one of the two eclipses the other....."
source:
'The Abbreviation of the Introduction to Astrology' Chapter Three
Abu'Mashar
Last edited:
david starling
Well-known member
Thanks
no mention on that link re: Venus cazimi in Sagittarius recently
not Scorpio, Sagittarius and not Mercury, Venus
keep in mind that I'm no expert
simply a student on our astrological learning forum
"….........'Application' is of two species.
One is application in longitude
the other is application in latitude. . .
If application in latitude is from conjunction
then it is, when the two planets are in one sign
and they are equal in degrees in longitude
and in latitude
and are in the same direction
and one of the two eclipses the other....."
source:
'The Abbreviation of the Introduction to Astrology' Chapter Three
Abu'Mashar
I'm seeing Mercury cazimi in tropical Scorpio on Oct. 27, 2016.
Venus cazimi this year on June 3rd, and with the 8 year cycle, there was one on June 5th in 2012.
david starling
Well-known member
You're right. The article I read that in was wrong. Venus was Direct during her last cazimi Aug. 13th, 2019.
She is once cazimi direct and once cazimi retrograde, same as Mercury, it's obvious.
JUPITERASC
Well-known member
article not reliable then
david starling
Well-known member
article not reliable then
No, my bad. I didn't read it carefully enough--only for the "Inferior" cazimi is Venus always retrograde.
Last edited:
I checked, there is no Venus cazimi in Sagittarius for the first third of this century at the very least.
The ancients preferred planets at the apogees, that is away from the Earth. This coincides with the direct phases. The modern heliocentric terms inferior and superior might be appropriate.
dd78
Well-known member
so that's longitude cazimi - not latitude as well
SO
on Jan.10th 2020
it`s gonna be a fatamorgana
because Moon will be eclipsed = opposing Sun by latitude AND longitude.
and Mercury will "only" be conjunct Sun by degree and minute of longitude in tropical zodiac.
what a tricky planet !
so shat`s the difference between cazimi and Sun eclipse?
if both require involved planets to be conjunct both by latitude AND longitude?
Last edited:
dd78
Well-known member
david starling
Well-known member
SO
on Jan.10th 2020
it`s gonna be a fatamorgana
because Moon will be eclipsed = opposing Sun by latitude AND longitude.
and Mercury will "only" be conjunct Sun by degree and minute of longitude in tropical zodiac.
what a tricky planet !
so shat`s the difference between cazimi and Sun eclipse?
if both require involved planets to be conjunct both by latitude AND longitude?
The planets aren't large enough to block the Sun. They can be seen on the Sun as black spots, with Venus as a "beauty mark".
The planets aren't large enough to block the Sun. They can be seen on the Sun as black spots, with Venus as a "beauty mark".
The (annular) eclipse last week also couldn't block the Sun. The Moon also has to be closer to the Earth, for there to be a total eclipse.
david starling
Well-known member
The (annular) eclipse last week also couldn't block the Sun. The Moon also has to be closer to the Earth, for there to be a total eclipse.
So, for the eclipses, it's the Perigee, not the Apogee?
dd78
Well-known member
The (annular) eclipse last week also couldn't block the Sun. The Moon also has to be closer to the Earth, for there to be a total eclipse.
Right
so alone the fact that something isn`t visible to the human eye ( like any bacteria, not to mention viruses etc. ! )
OR from a certain location (like e.g. Earth cazimi as seen from Mars, if it is astronomically possible)
doesn`t DENY the existence of this thing or phenomenon
Last edited:
The perigee, there it is also faster, the perihelion of the Sun also helps slightly.
But it doesn't have to do that much with the distances, but rather with the total obscuration that causes enormous emanating amount of moisture, heat, dryness or cold by spilling it into the atmosphere.
Last edited: