14404
here is another falsified earthquake summary by the USGS.
the falsification of data first started about8 years ago. the USGS produced a catalogue of earthquakes going back 100 years. the intent of the article was to show that the number of large quakes had not increased but remained constant over that time period. I think the list still exist but I can't find it. anyways, this list was pure fabrication. after describing their technique etc., the last paragraph before that listed the large quakes said," this list was produced by assuming that the rate of large quakes during the last decade was the norm. so they projected backwards to claim that these large earthquakes has existed at a common rate for over a hundred years. this was a blatant lie for a couple of reasons.
the first is that the rate of large quakes 7.0 was constant at 2-3 a years since record have been kept. but beginning in 1970 the number of large quakes doubled every 19 years. that is from 1960 t0 1970 there were 3 large quakes .from 1970 to 1980 there were 7 large quakes. from 1980 to 1990 there were 15 large quakes and from 1990 t0 1995(when I read this article in popular science magazine) there had already been 15 large quakes.
secondly as astrologers we know that the earth has been slowing down about one second a year si9nce about 1900.calculating charts one must add the accumulation of seconds to the LST to remain in correlation with he ephemeris.
this article simply ignores the basis analysis of earthquakes historically
hi lilly0170
although this is not a horary response to your question, there is a practical method to predict ovulation
there is a astronomical/astrological technique to predict when a woman ovulates. as you know fertilization can only occur in a 20-30 minute window as the egg travels down the fallopian tubes.
this movement by the egg occurs when the transiting sun-moon relationship is the same as in your natal chart.
I think this is called the Jonas astrological method.
so for instance if you are born with the moon 90 degrees in front of the sun, then every month ,no matter what signs,when the moon is 90 degrees in front of the sun, you will ovulate. ovulation has nothing to do with a woman's menstruation cycle.
your moon is in front of your sun by 21degrees 55minutes, so each month when this exact aspect forms you will ovulate.
on December 20 ,2017 at 7:12UT, you will begin to ovulate.since sperm is motile for 3 days, sexual contact in these 3 days will give the sperm a chance to fertilize your egg. I would think the night before would be the best time to try to become pregnant .
https://www.forbes.com/sites/trevor...dict-uptick-in-2018-earthquakes/#792eee276f24
Earth's Rotation Is Mysteriously Slowing Down: Experts Predict Uptick In 2018 Earthquakes
Scientists have found strong evidence that 2018 will see a big uptick in the number of large earthquakes globally. Earth's rotation, as with many things, is cyclical, slowing down by a few milliseconds per day then speeding up again.
You and I will never notice this very slight variation in the rotational speed of Earth. However, we will certainly notice the result, an increase in the number of severe earthquakes.
Geophysicists are able to measure the rotational speed of Earth extremely precisely, calculating slight variations on the order of milliseconds. Now, scientists believe a slowdown of the Earth's rotation is the link to an observed cyclical increase in earthquakes.
To start, the research team of geologists analyzed every earthquake to occur since 1900 at a magnitude above 7.0. They were looking for trends in the occurrence of large earthquakes. What they found is that roughly every 32 years there was an uptick in the number of significant earthquakes worldwide.(I don't know where they get this data but it probably is from the bogus list of alleged great quakes that I mentioned above rahu)
The team was puzzled as to the root cause of this cyclicity in earthquake rate. They compared it with a number of global historical datasets and found only one that showed a strong correlation with the uptick in earthquakes. That correlation was to the slowing down of Earth's rotation. Specifically, the team noted that around every 25-30 years Earth's rotation began to slow down and that slowdown happened just before the uptick in earthquakes. The slowing rotation historically has lasted for 5 years, with the last year triggering an increase in earthquakes...............................
the entire scientific establishment has been politicized over the last 20 or so years. the first report of bogus data came from a scientist who wrote a article in Science magazine in the early 1990s. the government had approached climate scientists and told them to change the level of particulate matter in the air. the government had never asked scientist to falsify their data before, although today, you cannot trust what government scientist say about anything. the only possible reason the government wanted to falsify the data was that at the end of the first Iraq war, saddam Hussein had ordered all the wells in Kuwait to be blown up. the burning of these petroleum fires produce a huge increase in particulate matter in the atmosphere. so apparently the defense department did not want the real dimensions of the destruction of wells to be concealed from the public.
it seems the current falsehood is being spread to try to alleviate the publics fear of the increasing number of large quakes by focusing on this non existent rotation argument.
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/research/data/centennial.pdf
i expressed extreme skepticism about the usgs claim that the rate of largest quakes has been constant over the last century.
i finally got around to looking at their data
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/research/data/centennial.pdf
the last paragraph before the list of earthquakes is as follows:
"If our magnitude assumptions are valid,then the rate of earthquake occurance at any given magnitude threshold should be constant provided that the global rates of seismicity are assumed constant on a timescale of decades(Pachceo and Sykes 1992) and the catalog is complete at that threshold."
this catalog is based on assumptions.and the basic flaw is they assume the rate has been constant for the century based on the last 4 or 5 decades as there isno accurate data from the first half of the century.of course if one assumes earthquakes are ofconstant frequency, then any theorical list will reflect this assumption.
ithe list provides a tidied list of magnitudes and locations.
but the reality is not that clear for early earthquakes with no depth or magnitude recorded(no earthquake scales existed before the 50's).
to make a point how difficult this is ,one needs to look only at the great san francisco earthquake in 1906this occurred in a highly populated area and with state of the art seismgraphs of the time,yet it was almost 100 years before seismologist could pinpoint the location .the epicenter was place over a wide area of northern california.then about 25 years ago ,instead of the epicenter being in the east bay or north bay( as many assume by the fault libes that ruptured) the epicenter was placed of the beach off the Great Highway in san francisco.then about 10 yeaqrs ago,this estimate was revuised and today the epicenter is placed off the beach of the city ofpacifica.this is about 10 miles furthur south. so how can they make assumptions about great quakes that happened for instance in the desert of mongolia with no dense population?
and if there is such consistency ,why can the usgs not predict into the future instead of just the past
rahu
here is another falsified earthquake summary by the USGS.
the falsification of data first started about8 years ago. the USGS produced a catalogue of earthquakes going back 100 years. the intent of the article was to show that the number of large quakes had not increased but remained constant over that time period. I think the list still exist but I can't find it. anyways, this list was pure fabrication. after describing their technique etc., the last paragraph before that listed the large quakes said," this list was produced by assuming that the rate of large quakes during the last decade was the norm. so they projected backwards to claim that these large earthquakes has existed at a common rate for over a hundred years. this was a blatant lie for a couple of reasons.
the first is that the rate of large quakes 7.0 was constant at 2-3 a years since record have been kept. but beginning in 1970 the number of large quakes doubled every 19 years. that is from 1960 t0 1970 there were 3 large quakes .from 1970 to 1980 there were 7 large quakes. from 1980 to 1990 there were 15 large quakes and from 1990 t0 1995(when I read this article in popular science magazine) there had already been 15 large quakes.
secondly as astrologers we know that the earth has been slowing down about one second a year si9nce about 1900.calculating charts one must add the accumulation of seconds to the LST to remain in correlation with he ephemeris.
this article simply ignores the basis analysis of earthquakes historically
hi lilly0170
although this is not a horary response to your question, there is a practical method to predict ovulation
there is a astronomical/astrological technique to predict when a woman ovulates. as you know fertilization can only occur in a 20-30 minute window as the egg travels down the fallopian tubes.
this movement by the egg occurs when the transiting sun-moon relationship is the same as in your natal chart.
I think this is called the Jonas astrological method.
so for instance if you are born with the moon 90 degrees in front of the sun, then every month ,no matter what signs,when the moon is 90 degrees in front of the sun, you will ovulate. ovulation has nothing to do with a woman's menstruation cycle.
your moon is in front of your sun by 21degrees 55minutes, so each month when this exact aspect forms you will ovulate.
on December 20 ,2017 at 7:12UT, you will begin to ovulate.since sperm is motile for 3 days, sexual contact in these 3 days will give the sperm a chance to fertilize your egg. I would think the night before would be the best time to try to become pregnant .
https://www.forbes.com/sites/trevor...dict-uptick-in-2018-earthquakes/#792eee276f24
Earth's Rotation Is Mysteriously Slowing Down: Experts Predict Uptick In 2018 Earthquakes
Scientists have found strong evidence that 2018 will see a big uptick in the number of large earthquakes globally. Earth's rotation, as with many things, is cyclical, slowing down by a few milliseconds per day then speeding up again.
You and I will never notice this very slight variation in the rotational speed of Earth. However, we will certainly notice the result, an increase in the number of severe earthquakes.
Geophysicists are able to measure the rotational speed of Earth extremely precisely, calculating slight variations on the order of milliseconds. Now, scientists believe a slowdown of the Earth's rotation is the link to an observed cyclical increase in earthquakes.
To start, the research team of geologists analyzed every earthquake to occur since 1900 at a magnitude above 7.0. They were looking for trends in the occurrence of large earthquakes. What they found is that roughly every 32 years there was an uptick in the number of significant earthquakes worldwide.(I don't know where they get this data but it probably is from the bogus list of alleged great quakes that I mentioned above rahu)
The team was puzzled as to the root cause of this cyclicity in earthquake rate. They compared it with a number of global historical datasets and found only one that showed a strong correlation with the uptick in earthquakes. That correlation was to the slowing down of Earth's rotation. Specifically, the team noted that around every 25-30 years Earth's rotation began to slow down and that slowdown happened just before the uptick in earthquakes. The slowing rotation historically has lasted for 5 years, with the last year triggering an increase in earthquakes...............................
the entire scientific establishment has been politicized over the last 20 or so years. the first report of bogus data came from a scientist who wrote a article in Science magazine in the early 1990s. the government had approached climate scientists and told them to change the level of particulate matter in the air. the government had never asked scientist to falsify their data before, although today, you cannot trust what government scientist say about anything. the only possible reason the government wanted to falsify the data was that at the end of the first Iraq war, saddam Hussein had ordered all the wells in Kuwait to be blown up. the burning of these petroleum fires produce a huge increase in particulate matter in the atmosphere. so apparently the defense department did not want the real dimensions of the destruction of wells to be concealed from the public.
it seems the current falsehood is being spread to try to alleviate the publics fear of the increasing number of large quakes by focusing on this non existent rotation argument.
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/research/data/centennial.pdf
i expressed extreme skepticism about the usgs claim that the rate of largest quakes has been constant over the last century.
i finally got around to looking at their data
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/research/data/centennial.pdf
the last paragraph before the list of earthquakes is as follows:
"If our magnitude assumptions are valid,then the rate of earthquake occurance at any given magnitude threshold should be constant provided that the global rates of seismicity are assumed constant on a timescale of decades(Pachceo and Sykes 1992) and the catalog is complete at that threshold."
this catalog is based on assumptions.and the basic flaw is they assume the rate has been constant for the century based on the last 4 or 5 decades as there isno accurate data from the first half of the century.of course if one assumes earthquakes are ofconstant frequency, then any theorical list will reflect this assumption.
ithe list provides a tidied list of magnitudes and locations.
but the reality is not that clear for early earthquakes with no depth or magnitude recorded(no earthquake scales existed before the 50's).
to make a point how difficult this is ,one needs to look only at the great san francisco earthquake in 1906this occurred in a highly populated area and with state of the art seismgraphs of the time,yet it was almost 100 years before seismologist could pinpoint the location .the epicenter was place over a wide area of northern california.then about 25 years ago ,instead of the epicenter being in the east bay or north bay( as many assume by the fault libes that ruptured) the epicenter was placed of the beach off the Great Highway in san francisco.then about 10 yeaqrs ago,this estimate was revuised and today the epicenter is placed off the beach of the city ofpacifica.this is about 10 miles furthur south. so how can they make assumptions about great quakes that happened for instance in the desert of mongolia with no dense population?
and if there is such consistency ,why can the usgs not predict into the future instead of just the past
rahu
Last edited:
