No they weren't deflection or personal attacks. I was trying to get real answers from you which you could not provide. At one point, you made an assertion, I asked you for evidence. The burden of proof was on you at that point. You weren't able to back yourself up or sufficiently answer my question
And look around. Civilization is corrupt and in shambles because we lost our source, our intuition. Ancients used intution and were far more advanced than we are. Science is JUST now catching up to what mystics have known for hundreds of years
Logic and rationality are useful, but society in modern times overrelies on them and it prevents them from getting to the truth
I was never deflecting or attacking you, you just don't like what I'm saying
I've been repeating it because you are continuously unable to prove your assertion that IQ can predict who will make great scientific innovations
I considered what you said, but you were unable to back yourself up
You don't argue back using what I had provided to you. If you were to be like okay well even if you claimed that, that doesn't mean that-that's logic. If you were to be like we'll I define logic as that and that's a higher indicator of success blah blah, and here's a source, that's a debatable claim. But all you do is discredit and make big claims about something studied for so long. You know that neuroscientists are studying things like neuroplasticity and child development and they do so by using IQ as a tool. By your statements, the would mean not using that as a tool.
All you do is repeat the same two statements with nothing to tackle what I say and then try and argue that the less important things of what I said had no meaning or is useless. Which makes me think that you're not here to debate and learn, or be challenged, you're here to discredit me, or anyone else that rubbed you off the wrong way or said something you did not like.
As for what you said about civilizations. Noone is saying intuition is not important but that doesn't mean you have to swing to the other extreme and say logic, studies, sources, experiments is not either.
Intuition is literally 70 percent of high IQ. Intuition(mbti) guides one to to be innovative. But action and thought without rationale and logic can be dangerous.
And the mere fact that your life expectancy is as long as it is, the fact that you are well nourished, and safe and have a device in which you can cimmunicate with me is a consequence of science and the usage of logic, rationale and a well developed framework of truth seeking.