tsmall
Premium Member
The short story. In early April the new president of the board of the non profit my husband founded (and with whom there was already no love lost) went out of her mind and in collusion with an employee who was about to be fired did a lot of very nasty and not necessarily legal things in order to wrest control of the non profit away from my husband. Part of what she did in addition to firing him with no warning what so ever was file a complaint in court (something btw corporations are not supposed to do on their own behalf--they are supposed to have an attorney do it) alleging some pretty horrific and completely untrue fears about animal abuse.
No complaint of abuse had ever or to date has been filed with any regulatory agency (and we report to several), just these out of left field and unsubstantiated allegations, which were created out of whole cloth solely for the purpose of the second part of her actions, which were to force the court to "grant custody" for lack of a better term to the non profit of all the animals which at the time were housed in the facility, owned by us and leased to the non profit. It was an effort to skate around the significant fact that more than half of the animals here, as well as most of the equipment, the trademark, and the customer data base belong personally to us and had not yet been transferred in any way to the non profit.
In an effort to keep this brief (though I am more than willing to answer questions)...we have filed a counter suit for the return of our property (which we can prove beyond any doubt belongs to us since we have all the documentation, including many written instances of acknowledgement on the part of the board of our continued ownership of these assets. In addition, we have filed for damages for defamation of character, abuse of process, trespass, wrongful termination...yadda yadda.
Lilly said that the the strongest of the significators ought to have the victory.
In this case Venus (us) is essentially dignified for being in her own term (not much, but better than nothing, and she gets a big assist from the conjunction with Mercury in Gemini. She's in the 9th for being 5* or less from the cusp of the 9th, in bright degree, free from the beams, swift...
Mars is not so great. In detriment, combust, in the 8th and in welled degree. There is no aspect between Venus and Mars, though Venus receives Mars by domicile and triplicity (note that since I'm following Lilly in CA I have used his dignities.) Mars does not receive Venus. Lilly suggests that if there is one way reception then there is likelyhood of a settlement (which in this case is definitely one potential outcome) and that we should look to the planet that receives them both to see who would bring about the settlement. In this case it's Saturn.
Saturn is also significant because he is the ruler of the 4th, which is the end of all matters, and in this case present in the 1st, retrograde. He is also the exaltation ruler of the ASC. Does this give indication that the assets we own will be returned to us?
I am unclear as to how to determine whether damages will be awarded. Also, I would love for any one to offer an interpretation of the Moon's next aspect, which is to oppose Mars. Moon is in at least as poor condition as Mars and there is some interesting reception there. It looks like something is going to get ugly (which the situation already is, as indicated by the Moon's corruption.) The question is will it be even more ugliness for us? Mars is combust, so what ever Moon is pushing to him (disposition or management, since she has no power where she is) is going to be returned.
The chart seems to say that yes, we will win. But in the meantime it would help to know how.
No complaint of abuse had ever or to date has been filed with any regulatory agency (and we report to several), just these out of left field and unsubstantiated allegations, which were created out of whole cloth solely for the purpose of the second part of her actions, which were to force the court to "grant custody" for lack of a better term to the non profit of all the animals which at the time were housed in the facility, owned by us and leased to the non profit. It was an effort to skate around the significant fact that more than half of the animals here, as well as most of the equipment, the trademark, and the customer data base belong personally to us and had not yet been transferred in any way to the non profit.
In an effort to keep this brief (though I am more than willing to answer questions)...we have filed a counter suit for the return of our property (which we can prove beyond any doubt belongs to us since we have all the documentation, including many written instances of acknowledgement on the part of the board of our continued ownership of these assets. In addition, we have filed for damages for defamation of character, abuse of process, trespass, wrongful termination...yadda yadda.
Lilly said that the the strongest of the significators ought to have the victory.
In this case Venus (us) is essentially dignified for being in her own term (not much, but better than nothing, and she gets a big assist from the conjunction with Mercury in Gemini. She's in the 9th for being 5* or less from the cusp of the 9th, in bright degree, free from the beams, swift...
Mars is not so great. In detriment, combust, in the 8th and in welled degree. There is no aspect between Venus and Mars, though Venus receives Mars by domicile and triplicity (note that since I'm following Lilly in CA I have used his dignities.) Mars does not receive Venus. Lilly suggests that if there is one way reception then there is likelyhood of a settlement (which in this case is definitely one potential outcome) and that we should look to the planet that receives them both to see who would bring about the settlement. In this case it's Saturn.
Saturn is also significant because he is the ruler of the 4th, which is the end of all matters, and in this case present in the 1st, retrograde. He is also the exaltation ruler of the ASC. Does this give indication that the assets we own will be returned to us?
I am unclear as to how to determine whether damages will be awarded. Also, I would love for any one to offer an interpretation of the Moon's next aspect, which is to oppose Mars. Moon is in at least as poor condition as Mars and there is some interesting reception there. It looks like something is going to get ugly (which the situation already is, as indicated by the Moon's corruption.) The question is will it be even more ugliness for us? Mars is combust, so what ever Moon is pushing to him (disposition or management, since she has no power where she is) is going to be returned.
The chart seems to say that yes, we will win. But in the meantime it would help to know how.