Interesting post on the radicality of a chart.
Historically Masha'allah (8th Century) said that late degrees charts were depicting
incorrect or incomplete information, thus leading to an incorrect judgment.
Bonatti (13th Century) used the between sign ascendant to verify his
suspicion of an insincere question and then pursue the investigation if the Hour Lord matched the Rising Sign. Here we have a Jupiter sign and a Mars Hour.
Besides the querent having to be moved by a question,
the planets have to respond and imprint upon the situation. Here we have a potential first relationship question with the Ruler of 1st in 11th House, a Moon in the 6th in Virgo and the Ruler of the 7th Mercury?? peregrine in Cancer in the 4th???. Sounds more like a family relationship.
Which is to say the chart has to describe the question.
Lilly (17th Century)
compared the physical appearance of the querent with the ASC or sometimes a natal planet conjunct the late degree ASC. Overall, there are 14 charts in 'Christian Astrology' that are not radical but still worked on.
For more info on the subject, see the article of Ryhan Butler
http://www.medievalastrologyguide.com/radicality.html
Ouranos